Home

  • Space Debris, an Overlooked National Security Challenge

    Artistic rendition of space debris in orbit around Earth

    (Image Source: GoodFon.com; https://tinyurl.com/5fj2psyt)

    By Lucas Wood-Gluck

    The lack of attention by U.S. policymakers on the threat posed by space debris is an existential challenge to orbital infrastructure, such as military reconnaissance, and humanity’s long-term potential as a space-faring species.


    As the security and commercial importance of Earth’s orbit continues to grow, so too does the national security threat posed by space debris. The European Space Agency defines space debris as all non-functional, human-made objects in orbit or reentering Earth’s atmosphere.[i] Space debris pose significant physical risks to U.S. and allied satellites and spacecraft responsible for weather forecasting, wildfire monitoring, GPS navigation, communications, intelligence gathering, and even humanity’s prospects as a space-faring species. As a result, the United States should more heavily prioritize space debris as a contemporary and future national security challenge.

    Space debris is generated from but not limited to parts of launch vehicles and rocket bodies, non-functional satellites, and even tools lost by astronauts.[ii] Since the late 2010s, there has been a meteoric rise in objects sent into orbit from about 241 launched in 2014 to approximately 2,849 in 2024. Approximately eighty percent of launches in 2024 were of U.S. origin.[iii] SpaceX, for example, is reported to have “performed more orbital launches than the rest of the world combined” in 2024 and has been awarded numerous multi-billion dollar contracts with the U.S. federal government for its services.[iv] This rise can be attributed to “growing global demand for information services, the greater availability of capital compared to previous eras of commercial satellite growth, the increasing affordability of access to space launch, and greater economies of scale.”[v]

    As a result of the continuously growing intersection between spacecraft, business, and national security, the more than nine thousand metric tons of space debris pose an unsustainable risk to satellites and the services they provide.[vi] A collision from a one-centimeter particle travelling ten kilometers a second releases the same energy as a small car crashing at forty kilometers an hour.[vii] Thus, the physical vulnerability of satellites in orbit has an outsized impact on daily life back on Earth. Additionally, satellite producers often overlook how to properly de-orbit old satellites, leaving them to float aimlessly once their usefulness is at an end. This negligence not only adds to the debris count, but large satellites specifically can also survive atmospheric re-entry and strike Earth’s surface.[viii]

    One of the most frightening consequences of space debris, however, is the Kessler Syndrome, an upper limit to the amount of space debris in orbit at any point in time.[ix] If that limit is exceeded, then debris can continuously collide with itself until Earth’s orbit is blanketed by junk that prevents new spacecraft from escaping the atmosphere. Experts are divided on what that upper limit is, but there is a possibility that the Kessler Syndrome could come into effect this century – especially if one distinguishes between a “physical” and an “economic” Kessler Syndrome. The latter refers to firms deeming the launching of new satellites too unprofitable due to space debris prior to the onset of the “physical” Kessler Syndrome.[x] Not only would the commercial and national security viability of Earth’s orbit disappear instantly, but so too would Earth’s chances of becoming a space-faring species.

    Consequently, a concerted effort to prevent and remove as much debris as possible from Earth’s orbit should become a top priority among policymakers. Previous attempts in the U.S. Congress to pass relevant legislation, such as ORBITS Acts of 2024 which “specified agencies to take actions to remediate orbital debris,” have failed to make it to the President’s desk, possibly due to a lack of urgency and awareness on the topic.[xi] While these are necessary steps, the academic literature provides inspiration for potential action; for example, a paper from 2020 highlighted the results of a mission called RemoveDEBRIS which successfully demonstrated the use cases of a net, harpoon, and dragsail for removing space debris.[xii] Likewise, in March 2023 NASA released the most comprehensive financial analysis to date on space debris and suggested that lasers “have the potential to be the lowest cost and most scalable method of reducing the risks posed by orbital debris” with the added benefit that “they are the only remediation approach that appears capable of remediating trackable and non-trackable debris.”[xiii]

    In a time of unprecedented political polarization, tackling the threat posed by space debris provides a unique opportunity for constructive bipartisanship. The United States should make full use of its infrastructural, diplomatic, and commercial prowess to lead the charge in orbital debris prevention and removal. In other words, one of the first nations to send people to space now has the unique position to remove the consequences of that ingenuity. In addition to adequately funding relevant agencies like NASA and NOAA to monitor new and existing debris in orbit, Congress and the Trump Administration should push legislation incentivizing the private sector to successfully implement debris removal through grants, contracts, and tax incentives. The United States should moreover leverage its position on the world stage to persuade other countries to adopt similar solutions such as technical standards that better ensure successful spacecraft deorbiting. The issue of space debris furthermore provides the United States with an opportunity to partner with states across the Global South as developing countries often heavily rely on satellite infrastructure to compete in the global economy.[xiv] Nevertheless, regardless of the specific actions taken, space must remain an opportunity for humanity rather than a coffin caused by space debris.

    Works Cited

    Adilov, Nodir, Peter J. Alexander, and Brendan M. Cunningham. “An Economic ‘Kessler Syndrome’: A Dynamic Model of Earth Orbit Debris.” Economics Letters 166 (May 2018): 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.025.

    Aglietti, G.S., B. Taylor, S. Fellowes, S. Ainley, D. Tye, C. Cox, A. Zarkesh, et al. “RemoveDEBRIS: An In-Orbit Demonstration of Technologies for the Removal of Space Debris.” The Aeronautical Journal 124, no. 1271 (November 26, 2019): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.136.

    Bongers, Anelí, and José L. Torres. “Star Wars: Anti-Satellite Weapons and Orbital Debris.” Defence and Peace Economics 35, no. 7 (April 27, 2023): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2023.2208020.

    Colvin, Thomas, John Karcz, and Grace Wusk. “Cost and Benefit Analysis of Orbital Debris Remediation.” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, March 10, 2023. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/otps_-_cost_and_benefit_analysis_of_orbital_debris_remediation_-_final.pdf?emrc=507712.

    Congress.gov. “H.R.8787 – ORBITS Act of 2024.” Congress.gov. Accessed October 3, 2025. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8787?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22orbits+act+of+2024%22%7D&s=4&r=1.

    ———. “S.1898 – ORBITS Act of 2025.” Congress.gov, 2025. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1898?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22orbits+act%22%7D&s=5&r=9.

    European Space Agency. “ESA’s Zero Debris Approach,” n.d. https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Clean_Space/ESA_s_Zero_Debris_approach.

    Foust, Jeff. “SpaceX Launch Surge Helps Set New Global Launch Record in 2024.” SpaceNews, January 2, 2025. https://spacenews.com/spacex-launch-surge-helps-set-new-global-launch-record-in-2024/.

    Hallex, Matthew A., and Travis S. Cottom. “Proliferated Commercial Satellite Constellations: Implications for National Security.” National Defense University Press, March 31, 2020. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2106495/proliferated-commercial-satellite-constellations-implications-for-national-secu/.

    Lipton, Eric. “Musk’s SpaceX Could Secure Billions in New Contracts under Trump.” The New York Times, March 23, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/23/us/politics/spacex-contracts-musk-doge-trump.html.

    Mariappan, Amrith, and John L Crassidis. “Kessler’s Syndrome: A Challenge to Humanity.” Frontiers in Space Technologies 4 (November 28, 2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/frspt.2023.1309940.

    Mathieu, Edouard. “A Record Number of Objects Went into Space in 2023.” Our World in Data, March 11, 2024. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/a-record-number-of-objects-went-into-space-in-2023.

    NASA. “ARES | Orbital Debris Program Office | Frequently Asked Questions.” Nasa.gov, 2020. https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/faq/.

    Ngcofe, Luncedo. “Is There Enough Space for Africa in Outer Space?” South African Journal of Science 121, no. 3/4 (March 7, 2025). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2025/18777.

    Ocaya, Richard O., and Thembinkosi D. Malevu. “Space Debris Is Falling from the Skies. We Need to Tackle This Growing Danger.” Nature 639, no. 8055 (March 18, 2025): 571–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00797-7.


    [i] European Space Agency, “ESA’s Zero Debris Approach,” n.d., https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Clean_Space/ESA_s_Zero_Debris_approach.

    [ii] Anelí Bongers and José L. Torres, “Star Wars: Anti-Satellite Weapons and Orbital Debris,” Defence and Peace Economics 35, no. 7 (April 27, 2023): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2023.2208020.

    [iii] Edouard Mathieu, “A Record Number of Objects Went into Space in 2023,” Our World in Data, March 11, 2024, https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/a-record-number-of-objects-went-into-space-in-2023.

    [iv] Jeff Foust, “SpaceX Launch Surge Helps Set New Global Launch Record in 2024,” SpaceNews, January 2, 2025, https://spacenews.com/spacex-launch-surge-helps-set-new-global-launch-record-in-2024/.

    Eric Lipton, “Musk’s SpaceX Could Secure Billions in New Contracts under Trump,” The New York Times, March 23, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/23/us/politics/spacex-contracts-musk-doge-trump.html.

    [v] Matthew A. Hallex and Travis S. Cottom, “Proliferated Commercial Satellite Constellations: Implications for National Security,” National Defense University Press, March 31, 2020, https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2106495/proliferated-commercial-satellite-constellations-implications-for-national-secu/.

    [vi] NASA, “ARES | Orbital Debris Program Office | Frequently Asked Questions,” Nasa.gov, 2020, https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/faq/.

    [vii] European Space Agency

    [viii] Richard O. Ocaya and Thembinkosi D. Malevu, “Space Debris Is Falling from the Skies. We Need to Tackle This Growing Danger,” Nature 639, no. 8055 (March 18, 2025): 571–73, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00797-7.

    [ix] Amrith Mariappan and John L Crassidis, “Kessler’s Syndrome: A Challenge to Humanity,” Frontiers in Space Technologies 4 (November 28, 2023), https://doi.org/10.3389/frspt.2023.1309940.

    [x] Nodir Adilov, Peter J. Alexander, and Brendan M. Cunningham, “An Economic ‘Kessler Syndrome’: A Dynamic Model of Earth Orbit Debris,” Economics Letters 166 (May 2018): 79–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.025.

    [xi] Congress.gov, “H.R.8787 – ORBITS Act of 2024,” Congress.gov, accessed October 3, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8787?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22orbits+act+of+2024%22%7D&s=4&r=1;

    Congress.gov, “S.1898 – ORBITS Act of 2025,” Congress.gov, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1898?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22orbits+act%22%7D&s=5&r=9.

    [xii] G.S. Aglietti et al., “RemoveDEBRIS: An In-Orbit Demonstration of Technologies for the Removal of Space Debris,” The Aeronautical Journal 124, no. 1271 (November 26, 2019): 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.136.

    [xiii] Thomas Colvin, John Karcz, and Grace Wusk, “Cost and Benefit Analysis of Orbital Debris Remediation” (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, March 10, 2023), https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/otps_-_cost_and_benefit_analysis_of_orbital_debris_remediation_-_final.pdf?emrc=507712.

    [xiv] Luncedo Ngcofe, “Is There Enough Space for Africa in Outer Space?,” South African Journal of Science 121, no. 3/4 (March 7, 2025), https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2025/18777.


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

    Lucas Wood-Gluck

    Lucas is a second-year master’s student in the U.S. Foreign Policy and National Security program at SIS and a 2025-2026 Boren Fellowship awardee (Latvia, Russian). He is from Miami, Florida, received his bachelor’s degree in international studies from the University of Florida, and speaks English, Spanish, Russian, and Brazilian Portuguese.

  • Seeding Resistance Against Settler Colonialism: The Geopolitics of Palestinian Seed Libraries

    Jadu’i Watermelon harvested from heirloom seeds native to Jenin in the occupied West
    Bank, grown as part of a collaboration between the Palestine Heirloom Seed Library and Ujamaa Farming Cooperative Alliance. (Ranganathan, 2025)

    By Masha Kazantsev

    This article discusses how seed libraries, seed keeping, and heirloom seeds serve as an
    act of resistance and a way to preserve cultural identity for Palestinians against settler
    occupation and genocide.


    1. Introduction

    In the warm days of October, at the start of olive harvesting season, families from surrounding villages gather around in olive groves, tenderly picking the bountiful fruits into cloths and baskets. Children gather eagerly to aid their elders in picking or sorting. This is the  practice of A’wna or musha’a, a Palestinian communal land practice where farmers gather from village to village to help with various seasonal harvests.1 Decades before October 7th 2023 and continuing afterward, many of these olive trees, some thousands of years old, have been ripped from the ground by the Israeli military.2 Many of the farmers who tended to the olive trees were killed, and the groves which once held these sacred harvesting ceremonies now lay as wasteland of bombed, upturned, and empty erased land.3

    Land is key to settler colonialism, namely the conquest of land by one group such that another group’s attachment to that land is delegitimized and erased. Land is also central to resource extraction, power formation, and the concept of property. The commodification of land strips the spiritual value of a place, and creates a racial hierarchy of the people who inhabit that land, binding them to a capitalistic system.4 This racial capitalism is defined, drawing on scholars Ruth Wilson Gilmore and Jodi Melamed, as the inherent tendency for capital to accumulate through the racial ordering of people and places.5

    This system depends on displacement to generate wealth through the Israeli government and military stealing and destroying Palestinian land, as well as an active erasure of people native to the land.6 Land, stripped of its relational meaning, becomes only a vehicle for profit. This separation not only from land, but resources as well, is a form of apartheid, or a separation on the basis of ethnicity and race. According to the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, “apartheid” is defined in universal terms as a crime against humanity, involving “inhumane acts” committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime. These acts include forcible transfer of population and persecution against any identifiable group on the grounds of political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender identity.7

    In the face of violence, how do local communities resist the dispossession and erasure of colonialism? The concept of the Plantationocene is helpful to understanding settler colonial and racial violence as it is exerted on land and agriculture. Specifically,  heirloom seed libraries and Palestinian seed keeping are sites of resistance against occupation and reclamation of sovereignty through community engagement, traditional food practices, intergenerational knowledge, and storytelling. While this essay focuses on Palestine, seedkeeping is part of a larger global indigenous movement to reclaim food sovereignty and resist colonial structures. This analysis is framed through the lens of political ecology, critical agroecology, and geopolitics.

    In the wake of the atrocities committed against Israelis by Hamas, an armed terror group fighting for Palestinian rights, on October 7, 2023 and the ensuing total onslaught and annihilation of Gaza committed by the Israeli government over the past 700+ days, it is a timely moment to show longstanding acts of resistance by the Palestinians. As children, parents, and siblings continue to lose their lives to preventable famine, Palestine is the mirror to the rest of the world, exposing the structures of colonization that are alive and well in land and agriculture.

    2. Brief History

    The Zionist project of the post-World War II era was a movement which called for a safe, independent Jewish state in the wake of the Holocaust and the persecution and uneasy unwillingness of western countries to give asylum to Jewish refugees.8 Palestine was first proposed as the site for a partition plan by a 1947 UN charter detailing one Arab side and one Jewish side. The site was chosen as it is the Holy Land for Jews, Muslims, and Christians. This plan, Resolution 181, was drawn up during the end of the British Mandate. The land was not empty prior to the Israeli state’s creation in 1948; it was inhabited by a wide range of diverse groups of faith, co-existing and in community. After 1948, one group’s politics and cultural staying power was superimposed upon the others, often by force.9 

    There is a stark difference between Zionism and Judaism. Judaism is the religious practice of the Jewish people, while Zionism is a national and political ideology.10 While human and inalienable rights demand that no Jewish person should ever have to fear harm or persecution again, there have been major critiques of Zionism in its mission to create the Jewish state. The creation of Israel came with a major human cost, and set the stage for the violent present. The Nakba (Catastrophe) in 1948 was the westward forced displacement of over 700,000 Palestinians from their homes which allowed for settlers to occupy pre-built and abandoned homes.11 Behind this exodus is a clear settler logic: to claim land, one must erase its memory and remove those who remember it. As the Zionist slogan states, “a land without a people for a people without a land.”12  The cuisine, the fruit industries, the farms, the sea- every component of Palestinian food sovereignty and food culture was now in a position to be taken over, and used in order to build the identity of a middle eastern Jewish state, and claim the religious right to the land.13  The very presence of Palestinians is political, particularly in the last decade, as military occupation and violence in the form of shooting, bombs, and sieges have increased in scope and devastation.14  The topic of the state of Palestine has long been controversial. Criticism of the Israeli government and military violence has been conflated with antisemitism despite robust peacebuilding and human rights initiatives led by secular and religious Jewish organizations.15

    3. All About Land: The Fast and Slow Violence of Settler Colonial Rule

    The Plantationocene, a term emerging in response to the anthropocene, offers a more precise framing of the ecological and cultural violence tied to colonial capitalism. While the anthropocene describes humanity’s broad impact on the planet, particularly through fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, the Plantationocene names the specific historical trajectory of exploitation that has driven much of that destruction, particularly through settler colonialism. Coined to expose the links between colonialism, capitalism, and ecological degradation, the Plantationocene centers monoculture, forced labor, land dispossession, and extractive economies.16   

    Plantation logics continue to shape our world. From the violent land grabs of colonial conquest to the destruction of traditional food systems and commodification of seeds, these practices reflect an ongoing commodification of life. Settler colonialism thrives within this framework, using the tools of the Plantationocene to extract, dehumanize, and erase Indigenous ways of life.17  Seeds, once freely exchanged by communities, have been caught in the same web of erasure, privatization, and violence that has marked the experience of Indigenous peoples. Palestine, being a part of the Fertile Crescent, holds a legacy as being the birthplace of the domestication of wheat and barley.18  People have risked getting shot or arrested simply for foraging for wild thyme, an herb that is central to Palestinian (and the more widely known Middle Eastern) cuisine.19  The settler colonial structures and violences enacted against Palestinians also bear global similarities. At the core of the current genocide is a structural, cultural, and ecological violence designed to dispossess Indigenous communities of land, history, and life. The militant forces which project Zionist colonial operations have sought to eradicate, displace, and often advance the forced assimilation of indigenous groups by extracting the perceived enriched nature of so-called “virgin lands.”20  These are landscapes seen by the Israeli government as empty, ready to be cultivated, commodified, and controlled.

    4. Palestine as Plantationocene

    Plants, already named, known, and cared for in their original cultural contexts, were stripped of meaning, renamed, categorized, and sanitized to fit Western worldviews through global colonialism. This disconnection extended into the plantation system, where vast monocultures were designed to produce cash crops like cotton, sugar, and tobacco for colonial markets. The Transaltantic slave trade created a massive wealth boom for colonizing countries through resource extraction, for example: Haitian sugar cane crops, tobacco plantation in North Carolina, cotton in Gujurat, India and in Mississipi, USA.21  Crops began to be viewed purely through an extractive lens, along with the hands that tended the plants. These extractive systems demanded the removal of biodiversity and the imposition of industrial control over life. The logic of monoculture endures in today’s industrial agriculture. Starting in the 1970s and 1980s, chemical giants such as Monsanto and DuPont turned their attention to the seed industry, consolidating independent seed companies. Today, four companies control 60% of the global seed market and 75% of the global pesticide market.22  These corporations engineered seed varieties that depend on their associated chemicals, creating a cycle of dependency for farmers. Corporations criminalized the ancient practice of seed saving.23  Hybrid and sterile seeds, engineered not to reproduce, are an unnatural contradiction of what seeds represent: life, regeneration, and continuity. Through intellectual property regimes, corporations claim legal ownership over genetic materials and traditional practices, treating seeds as property devoid of history. Patents thus become a direct tool of coloniality, creating a sterile, neutral concept of seeds while actively destroying the cultural and ecological relationships of seedkeeping.24   Settler colonialism actively obscures and erases Indigenous peoples through violence and dispossession, shaping not only law and policy but also science, agriculture, and cultural memory itself.25

    At its core, settler colonialism, and the Plantationocene, is about land. Yet, land is understood very differently in capitalist and colonial contexts than in indigenous worldviews, which helps explain how the violence against Palestinians can manifest in destruction of the land, or displacement from it. This section examines these competing understandings of land while also discussing how the logic of the Plantationocene extends beyond territorial control to encompass food sovereignty, agriculture, and water governance.

    This logic materializes in the destruction of ecosystems, the imposition of colonial agriculture, and the criminalization of traditional farming. In Palestine, this has taken the form of militarized checkpoints, restricted access to agricultural land, and the splitting and zoning of land.26  For example, in Area C, 70% of land is off-limits to Palestinians.27  The result is a system of land apartheid, where Palestinians are simultaneously displaced and criminalized for attempting to remain on their own land.28

    Map of areas A, B, and C as of September 2024. Source: Al Jazeera. Haddad, M., & Ali, M. (2024)

    Food sovereignty is defined as “an expression of communities’ and Indigenous Peoples’ power to determine how they grow, prepare, share and eat food and a reflection of their relationship to land and water.”29  While “sovereignty” often suggests state-like control over land, many Indigenous revitalization projects instead redefine sovereignty as reciprocal, autonomous relationships with the land, protected from outside interference.30  For Palestinian farmers and seedkeeping groups, rebuilding food systems is inseparable from political autonomy. The struggle for food sovereignty is a combined struggle against erasure and occupation, as “a people cannot be truly sovereign if they cannot shape what and how they eat.”31

    Control over agriculture is a core tactic of settler-colonialism in Palestine. The Israeli state applies a wide range of policies to dismantle the Palestinian agricultural sector and displace farmers.32  Since 1967, the agricultural sector’s contribution to Palestine’s GDP has dropped from over 33% to just 3.9% by 2014, while its labor force share fell from 32% to less than 10% by 2015. Meanwhile, settler water consumption for agriculture is 18 times higher than that of Palestinians in the West Bank.33  Israeli settlers also appropriated both the land and techniques of Palestinian farmers, often rebranding them as their own. The concept of avodat ha-adama (working the land), for instance, emerged from Zionist ideology, yet copied the traditional Palestinian relationship to soil.34 In 1948, Zionist militias took over all Palestinian orange groves along the stretch of the Palestinian coast as well as the brand “Jaffa Orange”. The Jaffa Orange became trademarked as a symbol of a “New Israel.”35

    Water, too, has been weaponized. Palestinians are often denied access to natural water sources, such as wells and rainwater cisterns, even prior to October 7.36  As water and food began to be blockaded by the IDF, the criminalization of rainwater collection became further dire.37  The state of Israel systematically uproots olive trees, symbols of Palestinian heritage and resilience, in an effort to erase the cultural landscape.38  Despite these hardships, Palestinians continue to resist through the cultivation of Ba’ali (rain fed) seeds which require minimal water and represent centuries of resilient agro-ecological knowledge.39

    This strategy of agricultural suppression is reinforced by international financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF, which lend to the Palestinian Authority on the condition that it adopts neoliberal reforms: deregulation, privatization, and the development of export markets.40   Farmers have struggled to continue a biodiverse style of farming and rain fed agriculture. The pressures on Palestinian farmers to industrialize by international organizations and the Israeli government meant fields were homogenized into monoculture, while farmers who had intimate knowledge of the soil were displaced.41  Destruction of orchard trees, especially orange and olive, paint the depth of settler colonial violence.42 

    In the initial stages of the IDF’s response, it was estimated by Israeli operatives that Hamas combatants were killed for every two civilians. However, this underestimates the  civilian ratio, particularly children under 18, who make up 47% of the total population.43  It is now estimated that 69,000 Palestinians have been killed, directly and indirectly.44  Food and water have been weaponized, and Palestine is currently in the emergency final stages of famine, as food and aid is blocked from entering Gaza by the IDF.45  The destruction of infrastructure, including energy, water, agriculture, healthcare, sanitation, and housing, has created a near unlivable environment and devastating implications for future generations to come.46  Despite the ceasefire on October 10 2025, about 241 Palestinians have been killed, strikes have been ordered by the state of Israel, and food insecurity remains an urgent issue.47

    5. Seed Saving as Transnational Resistance

    Seeds are an integral part of human history. As humans began to farm, they selected for desirable traits such as robust yields and climate resistance.48  Over centuries, vegetables, grain, and fruit transformed into versions of the food we know today. Seed keeping is a term traditionally known to many indigenous groups.49  Indigenous relationships to land and non-human lives are kincentric, or seen as a web of relation, as opposed to hierarchical.50  In this worldview, growing crops is not a streamlined process to extract food, rather, it is service to land. Seeds are seen as kin, and safeguarded by seedkeepers. Just like heirloom objects, seeds are passed down through generations. Seeds, however, also contain the DNA of their predecessors. Seeds represent the stories and traditions of the farmers that have held them and farmed them.51  The Palestinian cultural values of perseverance, resistance, and rootedness in the land are encapsulated in the struggle for self determination.52  This ethos is mirrored in Indigenous practices where crop diversity is a direct result of ongoing acts of reclamation and resistance.

    Seeds also have symbolic and spiritual meaning. For instance, Ba’ali seeds are adapted for dry climates and used in Ba’al, the Palestinian practice of rainfed agriculture named after the Canaanite god of fertility and fortitude, Ba’al.53  Seeds suited to growth in an arid climate include wheat, tomatoes, okra, zucchini, and watermelon. Another prominent Palestinian crop is the Jaffa orange of Al-Majdal, which formed a booming industry in the 1930s and 1940s.  This orange was exported to the Middle East and Europe, earning its acclaim for its lovely sweetness, which became a source of pride and a symbol of Palestine’s nationhood.54 

    In many Indigenous traditions, seeds are not only viewed as ancestors but also as living archives, vessels of memory, identity, and ecological knowledge.55  Planting and harvesting are embedded in cultural and spiritual practices; seeds feed communities physically while also rooting them in place, memory, and relation. The act of growing food is ceremonial, relational, and intergenerational.56  The traces of the olive tree in Palestine date back to 8,000 BC, coming from Greece adapting readily to the arid conditions.57  Palestinian farmers and olive trees have a familial relationship, as the service of the caretaker for the tree is the main concern rather than the yield of olives. The care of the farmer is reflected in the tree’s health.58 

    The wealth of documentation on farming as resistance, rather than simple livelihood is telling of the story of colonialism and the erasure of traditional livelihoods.

     Seed libraries exist at the intersection of physical space and living tradition. They are dynamic, community-based networks for education, empowerment, and cultural continuity. In Palestine, these spaces help reclaim heirloom seed (also often known as landraces) varieties grown for generations, carrying in their DNA the tastes, stories, and relationships of the people who have cultivated them.59  Individuals can go to seed libraries to take seeds for gardening and farming, free of cost. Ideally, seeds from the plants grown would then be returned to the library for growing the next year.60  Seed libraries can also encompass the action of seed exchange, seed keeping, even the gathering of community over traditional crops, as this too builds connection back to traditional practices.61  Seed libraries create pathways for agricultural self-sufficiency, sovereignty, and serve as quiet but powerful acts of resistance against erasure.

    Heirloom seeds have cultural significance that transcends just cultural practice; in many ways these seeds hold generations of memories, which for many indigenous groups may be lost otherwise. As Vivien Sansour of the Palestinian Heirloom Seed Library (PHSL) explains, “These heirloom varieties represent our cultural identity, who we are is living in the DNA of these seeds”.62  The relationship between seeds and people is so deeply interwoven that the genetic bond is a complement to the kincentric connection.

    The saving of heirloom seeds is central to the mutual preservation of crop biodiversity and cultural heritage. Efforts to reclaim seeds as a commons (communal area/resource) involve the creation of spaces beyond the state and the market, with the production and circulation of seeds.63  Even an act of storing and exchanging seeds is seen as political, and threatening.64  Seed saving has a long and controversial history, even in the United States, a country that greatly prioritizes agricultural intellectual property rights in order to be a leader in world food production.  An early seed library in California was shut down by the State Agricultural Department, on the basis that the library was committing ‘agri-terrorism’ under the 2004 Seeds Act.65  These actions expose how seed sharing, a relational and reciprocal practice, threatens colonial-capitalist logics of extraction, ownership, and commodification. An example of this occurring in the current genocide is farmers like 24 year old Youssef Saqr Abu Rabie, whose fields were bulldozed. He was killed by the IDF for his efforts to keep seeds and grow vegetables in plastic containers using tree waste to feed his community under starvation conditions.66 

    Seeds, for many Palestinians, are more than tools of cultivation, they are national and cultural heirlooms. Passed down through generations, these landraces hold deep sentimental value, much like cherished family objects. Vivien Sansour’s founding of the PHSL centers the symbolic power of seeds as vessels of memory, identity, and hope. Based in Battir, a UNESCO World Heritage site, the PHSL functions as both an agricultural and artistic space that recovers ancient varieties and the stories they carry, saving them from extinction while repatriating the seeds back to the people.67

    Image from Battir, source: Palestine: Land of olives and vines – cultural landscape of southern Jerusalem, Battir – UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

     “Abu Samra أبو سمرة,” a song composed by Ziyad Hilal and inspired by the seed library, celebrates a variety in the PHSL:a dark-whiskered heirloom wheat used for bread and freekeh, a spiced grain dish. Sansour laments its loss: “Abu Samra seeds have been treasured and passed down for centuries, but in more recent times have been lost and forgotten… The danger is that we are becoming consumers not producers.”68  This critique of agribusiness warns against the displacement of traditional practices by industrialized systems reliant on chemicals and commodification, the same chemical and industrial practices employed by the state of Israel.69  Through projects like the PHSL, seeds of landraces native to the region are kept, exchanged, and planted around the world to keep Palestine alive.  Palestinians are able reclaim their roles as seed keepers and storytellers. Seeds become living archives, and symbols of a deep yearning of return.

    Top: Image of Abu Samra wheat (Cresswell, 2021). Bottom: Viviene Sansour holding the harvested wheat source: Sansour, V. (n.d.). Palestine Heirloom Seed Library

    Heirloom seeds evolve in situ, meaning they adapt to a specific environment and “know the soil.”70  In Palestinian poetry, this kinship relationship of seeds is described not only with people who serve them but also nonhuman entities, such as the moisture, the soil, the sun, the birds, and the wind.71  The ecological context is everything, because it shapes the experience of the seed and how it takes on characteristics of its own. The importance of in situ for heirloom seeds is also a fitting metaphor for examining the displacement and resilience of Palestinians from their lands.

    Seed libraries challenge industrial agriculture and settler control by reframing food as a communal right rather than a commodity. For example, a community garden that grows freely and feeds freely reclaims the logic of farming from capitalist extraction to collective care. In Palestine, this vision takes root in the work of institutions like the Palestine Museum of Natural History. Dr. Mazin Qumsiyeh, its founder, describes the museum’s gardening project as, “ a waiting game…Planted seeds do not bear fruit immediately.”72  Here, tending to plants becomes a form of long-term resistance, one that nurtures life under occupation and invests in future generations. Even the simple act of planting olive trees in Palestine is layered with resistance and risk. It is impactful when considering that an olive tree takes about seven to eight years from the time it is plated to bear fruit. It is fully mature in 15 years after planting.73  It is a refusal to surrender land, a symbol of return, and a declaration that Palestinians will continue to not just exist, but outlast the current system of violence. Qumsiyeh provides the framework that the current Plantationocene is not sustainable, and eventually will collapse in on itself.74 To save seeds is to refuse despair; it is to believe in a future where violence gives way to regeneration, and where land once stolen is tended again with care.

    6. Conclusion – Seeds For The Future

    Seed libraries are a symbol and serve as foundational steps in a broader process of resistance to settler colonialism. They offer a possibility for  communities to reclaim their seeds, stories, and sovereignty.

     However, Palestinian cultural foods have had a history of appropriation by the state of Israel as a nation building tool.75  This raises a pressing question: Can heirloom seeds in Palestine remain safe from commodification and appropriation? Despite this concern, many seed activists believe in the necessity of dispersion. These seeds are not sold, they are given after establishing an interpersonal relationship of trust and community. Entrustments such as this hold the opener to a social contract, a promise that creates a personal connection to the seeds.

    The PHSL hopes to share Palestinian seeds around the world, not to erase their origins, but to keep them alive until they can be returned and planted again in liberated soil.76  This is a vision not just of preservation, but of return.

    Palestine and international indigenous communities share a struggle of displacement and an attempted continued erasure of their identities and culture. Seed saving and seed libraries provide a way to repair and resist the violence of settler colonialism and the Plantationocene, while regaining relationships to oneself, food, and the land.

    Endnotes

    1.  Al Jazeera English. (2024, October 12). Harvesting resilience: Olive picking during war and displacement. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8vPD44inh0

    2.  Fakhri, M. (2024). Starvation and the right to food: With an emphasis on the Palestinian people’s food sovereignty (Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food). United Nations Human Rights Council.

    3.  United Nations. (2025, October). Un rights office sounds alarm over “skyrocketing” Israeli settler violence during Olive Harvest | UN News. United Nations. https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/10/1166145

    4.  Trott, S. (2024). Sowing discord: A critical discourse analysis of seeds and struggle in the Plantationocene.

    5.  Melamed, J. (2015). Racial capitalism. Critical ethnic studies, 1(1), 76-85.

    6.  Gilmore, R. W., Antipon, L. C., Alves, C. N., & Novo, M. F. (2024). Ruth Wilson Gilmore-Freedom is a place. Ruth Wilson Gilmore and Abolition Geography. GEOUSP, 28(1), e-222824.

    7.  Waxman, D. (2022). Israel, amnesty, and the apartheid accusation: a wake-up call. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 27(1/2), 25-32.

    8.  Waxman, D. (2022). Israel, amnesty, and the apartheid accusation: a wake-up call. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 27(1/2), 25-32.

    9.  United Nations. (2025). History of the Question of Palestine . United Nations. https://www.un.org/unispal/history/

    10.  Waxman, D. (2022). Israel, amnesty, and the apartheid accusation: a wake-up call. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 27(1/2), 25-32.

    11.  Molavi, S. C., & Weizman, E. (2024). Environmental warfare in Gaza: Colonial violence and new landscapes of resistance. Pluto Press.

    12.  Grosglik, R., Handel, A., & Monterescu, D. (2021). Soil, territory, land: The spatial politics of settler organic farming in the West Bank, Israel/Palestine. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(5), 906–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820967782

    13.  Waxman, D. (2022). Israel, amnesty, and the apartheid accusation: a wake-up call. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 27(1/2), 25-32.

    14.  Haan, N., Maxwell, D., Hailey, P., Seal, A., & Lopez, J. (2025). Famine Review Committee: Gaza Strip, August 2025.

    15.  Golan, D., & Orr, Z. (2012). Translating human rights of the “enemy”: The case of Israeli NGOs defending Palestinian rights. Law & So

    16.  Trott, S. (2024). Sowing discord: A critical discourse analysis of seeds and struggle in the Plantationocene.

    17.  Grosglik, R., Handel, A., & Monterescu, D. (2021). Soil, territory, land: The spatial politics of settler organic farming in the West Bank, Israel/Palestine. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(5), 906–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820967782

    18.  Hassouna, S. (2024). Cultivating biodiverse futures at the (postcolonial) botanical garden. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(2), e12639. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12639

    19.  Lakhani, N. (2024, February 27). Israel is deliberately starving Palestinians, UN rights expert says. The Guardian. Retrieved from

    20.  Grosglik, R., Handel, A., & Monterescu, D. (2021). Soil, territory, land: The spatial politics of settler organic farming in the West Bank, Israel/Palestine. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(5), 906–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820967782

    21.  Trott, S. (2024). Sowing discord: A critical discourse analysis of seeds and struggle in the Plantationocene.

    22.  Embree, J. K., & Gilman, N. V. (2024). The story of the modern seed library. Council on Library and Information Resources.

    23.  Trott, S. (2024). Sowing discord: A critical discourse analysis of seeds and struggle in the Plantationocene.

    24.  Embree, J. K., & Gilman, N. V. (2024). The story of the modern seed library. Council on Library and Information Resources.

    25.  Molavi, S. C., & Weizman, E. (2024). Environmental warfare in Gaza: Colonial violence and new landscapes of resistance. Pluto Press.

    26.  Haddad, M., & Ali, M. (2024). Ten maps to understand the occupied West Bank. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/16/ten-maps-to-understand-the-occupied-west-bank

    27.  Kohlbry, P. (2023). To cover the land in green: Rain-fed agriculture and anti-colonial land reclamation in Palestine. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(7), 2666–2684.

    28.  Fakhri, M. (2024). Starvation and the right to food: With an emphasis on the Palestinian people’s food sovereignty (Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food). United Nations Human Rights Council.

    29.  Fakhri, M. (2024). Starvation and the right to food: With an emphasis on the Palestinian people’s food sovereignty (Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food). United Nations Human Rights Council.

    30.  Menu, C., & Parker, C. (2018). Agricultural development and settler colonialism: Food sovereignty as an alternative to neoliberalism in Palestine.

    31.  Hill, C. G. (2017). Seeds as ancestors, seeds as archives: Seed sovereignty and the politics of repatriation to Native peoples. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 41(3), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.41.3.hill

    32.  Molavi, S. C., & Weizman, E. (2024). Environmental warfare in Gaza: Colonial violence and new landscapes of resistance. Pluto Press.

    33.  Menu, C., & Parker, C. (2018). Agricultural development and settler colonialism: Food sovereignty as an alternative to neoliberalism in Palestine.

    34.  Grosglik, R., Handel, A., & Monterescu, D. (2021). Soil, territory, land: The spatial politics of settler organic farming in the West Bank, Israel/Palestine. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(5), 906–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820967782

    35.  Abufarha, N. (2013). Land of symbols: Cactus, poppies, orange and olive trees in Palestine. In Middle Eastern Belongings (pp. 85–110). Routledge.

    36.  The occupation of water. Amnesty International. (2017, November 29). https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/11/the-occupation-of-water/

    37.  Muratoglu, A., & Wassar, F. (2024). Water at the intersection of human rights and conflict: a case study of Palestine. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1470201.

    38.  Stagni, F. (2024). As wide as the roots of the olive tree: Indigenous communities of Masafer Yatta and their eco-resistance. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 17(1), 149–170.

    39.  Van Den Berg, M. (2024). Seeds of resistance: Heirloom seeds and the struggle against environmental apartheid in Palestine. Students of Cultural Anthropology Journal.

    40.  Menu, C., & Parker, C. (2018). Agricultural development and settler colonialism: Food sovereignty as an alternative to neoliberalism in Palestine.

    41.  Hassouna, S. (2024). Cultivating biodiverse futures at the (postcolonial) botanical garden. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(2), e12639. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12639

    42.  Molavi, S. C., & Weizman, E. (2024). Environmental warfare in Gaza: Colonial violence and new landscapes of resistance. Pluto Press.

    43.  Crawford, N. (2025). The Human Toll of the Gaza War: Direct and Indirect Death from 7 October 2023 to 3 October 2025. Watson Institute for International & Public Affairs, Brown University, 7.

    44.  Shurafa, W., AlJoud, S. A., & Frankel, J. (2025, November 8). Gaza death toll tops 69,000 as Israel and Hamas exchange more remains. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/gaza-death-toll-tops-69000-as-israel-and-hamas-exchange-more-remains

    45.  Haan, N., Maxwell, D., Hailey, P., Seal, A., & Lopez, J. (2025). Famine Review Committee: Gaza Strip, August 2025.

    46.  Stamatopoulou-Robbins, S. (2024). The Human Toll: Indirect Deaths from War in Gaza and West Bank, October 7, 2023 Forward. Watson Institute for International & Public Affairs, Brown University, 7.

    47.  Shurafa, W., AlJoud, S. A., & Frankel, J. (2025, November 8). Gaza death toll tops 69,000 as Israel and Hamas exchange more remains. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/gaza-death-toll-tops-69000-as-israel-and-hamas-exchange-more-remains

    48.  Herrighty, E., & Hill, C. G. (2024). The seeds are coming home: A rising movement for Indigenous seed rematriation in the United States. Agriculture and Human Values, 41(3), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10502-z

    49.  Peiser, M. (2022). Citing seeds, citing people: Bibliography and Indigenous memory, relations, and living knowledge-keepers. Criticism, 64(3), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.64.3.0521

    50.  Peiser, M. (2022). Citing seeds, citing people: Bibliography and Indigenous memory, relations, and living knowledge-keepers. Criticism, 64(3), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.64.3.0521

    51.  Embree, J. K., & Gilman, N. V. (2024). The story of the modern seed library. Council on Library and Information Resources.

    52.  Menu, C., & Parker, C. (2018). Agricultural development and settler colonialism: Food sovereignty as an alternative to neoliberalism in Palestine.

    53.  Van Den Berg, M. (2024). Seeds of resistance: Heirloom seeds and the struggle against environmental apartheid in Palestine. Students of Cultural Anthropology Journal.

    54.  Abufarha, N. (2013). Land of symbols: Cactus, poppies, orange and olive trees in Palestine. In Middle Eastern Belongings (pp. 85–110). Routledge.

    55.  Hill, C. G. (2017). Seeds as ancestors, seeds as archives: Seed sovereignty and the politics of repatriation to Native peoples. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 41(3), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.41.3.hill

    56.  Herrighty, E., & Hill, C. G. (2024). The seeds are coming home: A rising movement for Indigenous seed rematriation in the United States. Agriculture and Human Values, 41(3), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10502-z

    57.  Abufarha, N. (2013). Land of symbols: Cactus, poppies, orange and olive trees in Palestine. In Middle Eastern Belongings (pp. 85–110). Routledge.

    58.  Stagni, F. (2024). As wide as the roots of the olive tree: Indigenous communities of Masafer Yatta and their eco-resistance. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 17(1), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v17i1p149

    59.   Sansour, V. (n.d.). Palestine Heirloom Seed Library. https://viviensansour.com/Palestine-Heirloom

    60.  Embree, J. K., & Gilman, N. V. (2024). The story of the modern seed library. Council on Library and Information Resources.

    61.  Herrighty, E., & Hill, C. G. (2024). The seeds are coming home: A rising movement for Indigenous seed rematriation in the United States. Agriculture and Human Values, 41(3), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10502-z

    62.  Sansour, V. (n.d.). Palestine Heirloom Seed Library. https://viviensansour.com/Palestine-Heirloom

    63.  Trott, S. (2024). Sowing discord: A critical discourse analysis of seeds and struggle in the Plantationocene.

    64.  Van Den Berg, M. (2024). Seeds of resistance: Heirloom seeds and the struggle against environmental apartheid in Palestine. Students of Cultural Anthropology Journal.

    65.   Embree, J. K., & Gilman, N. V. (2024). The story of the modern seed library. Council on Library and Information Resources.

    66.  Carneal, L. (2024, November 11). A picture of farming in Gaza today: In remembrance of Youssef Saqr abu rabie. Jadaliyya. https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/46334

    67.  Murray, H. (2021). Landscape as resistance in the West Bank. Places Journal. https://placesjournal.org/article/landscape-as-resistance-in-the-west-bank/

    68.  Sansour, V. (n.d.). Palestine Heirloom Seed Library. https://viviensansour.com/Palestine-Heirloom

    69.   Molavi, S. C., & Weizman, E. (2024). Environmental warfare in Gaza: Colonial violence and new landscapes of resistance. Pluto Press.

    70.  Van Den Berg, M. (2024). Seeds of resistance: Heirloom seeds and the struggle against environmental apartheid in Palestine. Students of Cultural Anthropology Journal.

    71.  Van Den Berg, M. (2024). Seeds of resistance: Heirloom seeds and the struggle against environmental apartheid in Palestine. Students of Cultural Anthropology Journal.

    72.  Hassouna, S. (2024). Cultivating biodiverse futures at the (postcolonial) botanical garden. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(2), e12639. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12639

    73.  Abufarha, N. (2013). Land of symbols: Cactus, poppies, orange and olive trees in Palestine. In Middle Eastern Belongings (pp. 85–110). Routledge.

    74.  Hassouna, S. (2024). Cultivating biodiverse futures at the (postcolonial) botanical garden. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(2), e12639. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12639

    75.  Ranta, R., & Mendel, Y. (2014). Consuming Palestine: Palestine and Palestinians in Israeli Food Culture. Ethnicities, 14(3), 412-435.76.  Sansour, V. (n.d.). Palestine Heir


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

    Masha Kazantsev

    Masha Kazantsev is a graduate student at the School of International Service studying
    Global Environmental Policy. She is interested in the impact of climate change on future
    infrastructures of urban spaces, food-cultural heritage, and migration policy. She is a generalist
    to her delight and detriment.

  • The Kremlin and Climate Profiteering

    Travel distance visual comparison between the Northern Sea Route and the Suez.
    (Image Source: Grid Arendal; https://tinyurl.com/5fuxv55y)

    By Lucas Wood-Gluck

    As climate change continues to melt Arctic ice, the Kremlin hopes to exploit newly-revealed natural resources and develop an alternative Arctic shipping route to enrich itself at the expense of its rivals.


    As Russia’s economy continues to falter amid sanctions, a lack of economic diversification, and costly offensives in southeastern Ukraine, few positive signs emerge regarding the country’s future. To offset this damage, the Kremlin is banking on an unorthodox long-term solution: climate change. With the resulting melting of Arctic ice, new deposits of fossil fuels would likely be discovered for extraction, and a fast, new shipping route under majority Russian control in the Arctic would be made available year-round.[i] In the eyes of the Kremlin, the effects of climate change will awaken the resting power of the Arctic and result in a resurgent Russia that empirically adapts to 21st-century challenges without once again “caving in” to the West.

    Even after acknowledging the adverse effects that climate change will have on Russia, the Kremlin optimistically cites “easier access to the Arctic for commercial exploration due to melting polar ice.”[ii] This melting of Arctic ice, while environmentally destructive, presents new economic and political opportunities for Russia including unilateral access to untapped oil, natural gas and rare earth metal (REM) deposits.[iii] The increased access coincides with the Kremlin’s calculations that global demand for oil and natural gas will remain stable enough in the coming decades to continue prioritizing them over more renewable forms of energy.[iv] Likewise, energy-importing countries that continue to struggle paying for the costs of expensive oil, natural gas, or the modernization of their energy infrastructure may be incentivized to purchase newfound Arctic fuel from Russia at low prices rather than invest in renewable energy. Furthermore, Russia aims to become “one of the top five REM producers with up to twelve percent of the global market share by 2030.” This comes at a time when REM extraction and processing are overwhelmingly controlled by China, and while Russia has the fifth largest REM reserves, it currently accounts for about one percent of global production.[v] As a result, despite being a signatory of the Paris Climate Accords, Russia has made no significant effort to curb its carbon emissions.[vi]

    In addition to more accessible oil, natural gas, and REM deposits, the Kremlin is especially hopeful about a fast, new shipping route opening along the arctic. Known as the Northern Sea Route (NSR), this shipping lane extends from the coastline of the European North Sea to the East China Sea.[vii] While the NSR has historically been extraordinarily expensive and dangerous to cross outside of the summertime due to freezing conditions and unpredictable weather, rising temperatures may soon allow for year-round traversal.[viii] Shipping times between Europe and East Asia are approximately thirty to forty percent faster through the NSR than through the Suez Canal, and melting ice will moreover reduce the costs associated with the risks of shipping in Arctic conditions.[ix] In fact, in October 2025, a Chinese container ship sailing from Zhoushan just south of Shanghai to the United Kingdom completed a pioneering journey through the NSR in just twenty days compared to the usual forty or fifty days through the Suez Canal or around the Cape of Good Hope.[x] This successful voyage highlights both the newfound commercial and military possibilities of a new shipping route but also the detrimental environmental impacts of climate change. With over fifty-three percent of the NSR under Russian jurisdiction, the Kremlin stands to profit tremendously while gaining immense political leverage with a new, fast shipping lane.[xi] One estimate cites that shipping and resource extraction along the NSR may generate approximately $160 billion USD in revenue for Russia over the next decade at a cost of about $40 billion USD in investments.[xii] As a result, the Kremlin has reportedly been modernizing ports along the NSR including in Murmansk, Arkhangelsk, Dikson, Tiksi, and Pevek to prepare itself and the world for the mainstream viability of the NSR.[xiii] While reduced shipping times will mean reduced costs for manufacturers and consumers, the development and use of the NSR places this new leverage predominantly in Moscow’s hands.

    Unfortunately, the scientific consensus is that climate change has very likely become irreversible.[xiv] Regardless of what should have been done or should still be done from an environmental perspective, policymakers and private decision-makers must address the new reality that U.S. adversaries are likely intending to profit from rather than combat the climate crisis. The Arctic is no longer just a wasteland for political prisoners nor a vacation getaway to see the northern lights, but an increasingly contested geopolitical hotspot unprecedentedly drawing in far-flung states, intergovernmental organizations, and multinational conglomerates. From several U.S. attempts to diplomatically acquire Greenland to China declaring itself a “Near-Arctic State,” the Far North is experiencing an extraordinary strategic ascendance.[xv] Under present conditions, however, the Arctic is fueling a resource race and game of geopolitical leverage that Russia will likely dominate predominantly due to its natural endowments and callous long-term vision. Therefore, as temperatures continue to climb and natural disasters rise in frequency and intensity, the United States and its allies must do whatever is possible to abate the effects of climate change. If, God forbid, not even that is possible, then the United States and its allies must at least shift their interpretation of the climate crisis to that of a fundamentally unfair geopolitical force that seeks to undermine their positions while emboldening the opposition.


    Works Cited

    Brownlee, Genevieve. “Cold Calculations: Economic Prospects for Arctic Shipping Routes.” Middlebury Institute of International Studies, June 2024. https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/sites/default/files/2024-07/cold-calculations-arctic-shipping-routes_miis_ited-working-paper_june2024.pdf?fv=vMZXNi3A.

    Bryanski, Gleb, and Anastasia Lyrchikova. “What Are Russia’s Rare Earth Metals Ambitions?” Reuters, February 26, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/what-are-russias-rare-earth-metals-ambitions-2025-02-26/.

    Chen, Xiuhao, and Joe Cash. “Chinese Freighter Halves EU Delivery Time on Maiden Arctic Voyage to UK.” Edited by Emelia Sithole-Matarise. Reuters, October 14, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/chinese-freighter-halves-eu-delivery-time-maiden-arctic-voyage-uk-2025-10-14/.

    Climate Action Tracker. “Russian Federation.” Climateactiontracker.org, November 9, 2022. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/russian-federation/.

    Deutsche Welle. “Arctic Melt: The Race for Resources.” dw.com, April 21, 2020. https://www.dw.com/en/arctic-melt-the-race-for-resources/video-48168376.

    Devyatkin, Pavel. “Russia’s Arctic Strategy: Energy Extraction (Part III).” The Arctic Institute – Center for Circumpolar Security Studies, February 20, 2018. https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/russias-arctic-strategy-energy-extraction-part-three/.

    Edvardsen, Astri. “Russia to Increase the Northern Fleet’s Combat Readiness and Strengthen Arctic Shipbuilding and Port Capacity.” Edited by Birgitte Annie Hansen. High North News, August 22, 2024. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/russia-increase-northern-fleets-combat-readiness-and-strengthen-arctic-shipbuilding-and-port.

    Humpert, Malte. “Russia to Earn $160bn in Taxes from Northern Sea Route by 2035, Arctic Region Accounts for 7.5 Percent of GDP.” High North News, May 19, 2025. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/russia-earn-160bn-taxes-northern-sea-route-2035-arctic-region-accounts-75-percent-gdp.

    ———. “The Future of the Northern Sea Route – a ‘Golden Waterway’ or a Niche Trade Route.” The Arctic Institute, September 15, 2011. https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/future-northern-sea-route-golden-waterway-niche/.

    Korchunov, Nikolay. “The Russian Federation.” Arctic Council, n.d. https://arctic-council.org/about/states/russian-federation/.

    “The Effects of Climate Change,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, October 23, 2024, https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/effects/.

    Puranen, Matti, and Sanna Kopra. “China’s Arctic Strategy – a Comprehensive Approach in Times of Great Power Rivalry.” Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies 6, no. 1 (January 1, 2023): 239–53. https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.196.

    Soldatkin, Vladimir. “Russia Sees Stable Oil Exports and Booming Gas Business by 2050.” Reuters, April 14, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russia-sees-stable-oil-exports-booming-gas-business-by-2050-2025-04-14/.

    The Economist. “Polar Bearings.” The Economist, July 12, 2014. https://www.economist.com/china/2014/07/12/polar-bearings?fsrc=scn%2Ftw%2Fte%2Fpe%2Fpolarbearings.

    The Moscow Times. “Russia’s Updated Climate Doctrine Drops Mention of Fossil Fuels.” The Moscow Times, October 27, 2023. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/10/27/russias-updated-climate-doctrine-drops-mention-of-fossil-fuels-a82915.

    U.S. Energy Information Administration. “Arctic Oil and Natural Gas Resources.” Eia.gov, January 20, 2012. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=4650.


    [i] Pavel Devyatkin, “Russia’s Arctic Strategy: Energy Extraction (Part III),” The Arctic Institute – Center for Circumpolar Security Studies, February 20, 2018, https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/russias-arctic-strategy-energy-extraction-part-three/.

    [ii] The Moscow Times, “Russia’s Updated Climate Doctrine Drops Mention of Fossil Fuels,” The Moscow Times, October 27, 2023, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/10/27/russias-updated-climate-doctrine-drops-mention-of-fossil-fuels-a82915.

    [iii] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Arctic Oil and Natural Gas Resources,” Eia.gov, January 20, 2012, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=4650.

    [iv] Vladimir Soldatkin, “Russia Sees Stable Oil Exports and Booming Gas Business by 2050,” Reuters, April 14, 2025, https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russia-sees-stable-oil-exports-booming-gas-business-by-2050-2025-04-14/.

    [v] Gleb Bryanski and Anastasia Lyrchikova, “What Are Russia’s Rare Earth Metals Ambitions?,” Reuters, February 26, 2025, https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/what-are-russias-rare-earth-metals-ambitions-2025-02-26/.

    [vi] Climate Action Tracker, “Russian Federation,” Climateactiontracker.org, November 9, 2022, https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/russian-federation/.

    [vii] The Economist, “Polar Bearings,” The Economist, July 12, 2014, https://www.economist.com/china/2014/07/12/polar-bearings?fsrc=scn%2Ftw%2Fte%2Fpe%2Fpolarbearings.

    [viii] Malte Humpert, “The Future of the Northern Sea Route – a ‘Golden Waterway’ or a Niche Trade Route,” The Arctic Institute, September 15, 2011, https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/future-northern-sea-route-golden-waterway-niche/.

    [ix] Genevieve Brownlee, “Cold Calculations: Economic Prospects for Arctic Shipping Routes” (Middlebury Institute of International Studies, June 2024), https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/sites/default/files/2024-07/cold-calculations-arctic-shipping-routes_miis_ited-working-paper_june2024.pdf?fv=vMZXNi3A.

    [x] Joe Cash and Xiuhao Chen, “Chinese Freighter Halves EU Delivery Time on Maiden Arctic Voyage to UK,” ed. Emelia Sithole-Matarise, Reuters, October 14, 2025, https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/chinese-freighter-halves-eu-delivery-time-maiden-arctic-voyage-uk-2025-10-14/.

    [xi] “The Effects of Climate Change,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, October 23, 2024, https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/effects/.

    [xii] Malte Humpert, “Russia to Earn $160bn in Taxes from Northern Sea Route by 2035, Arctic Region Accounts for 7.5 Percent of GDP,” High North News, May 19, 2025, https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/russia-earn-160bn-taxes-northern-sea-route-2035-arctic-region-accounts-75-percent-gdp.

    [xiii] Astri Edvardsen, “Russia to Increase the Northern Fleet’s Combat Readiness and Strengthen Arctic Shipbuilding and Port Capacity,” ed. Birgitte Annie Hansen, High North News, August 22, 2024, https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/russia-increase-northern-fleets-combat-readiness-and-strengthen-arctic-shipbuilding-and-port.

    [xiv] NASA, “The Effects of Climate Change,” science.nasa.gov (NASA, October 23, 2024), https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/effects/.

    [xv] Matti Puranen and Sanna Kopra, “China’s Arctic Strategy – a Comprehensive Approach in Times of Great Power Rivalry,” Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies 6, no. 1 (January 1, 2023): 239–53, https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.196.


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

    Lucas Wood-Gluck

    Lucas is a second-year master’s student in the U.S. Foreign Policy and National Security program at SIS and a 2025-2026 Boren Fellowship awardee (Latvia, Russian). He is from Miami, Florida, received his bachelor’s degree in international studies from the University of Florida, and speaks English, Spanish, Russian, and Brazilian Portuguese.

  • Will the Russian Gas Loophole Finally Close?

    An Analysis of New European Union Sanctions and Policy on Russian Gas Imports

    The now completed TurkStream pipeline in Bulgaria.
    (Image Source: iStock; https://tinyurl.com/y5jenytx)

    By Lucas Vroege

    In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shattered Europe’s complacent energy policy. In response, the European Union (EU) launched the RePowerEU initiative in April 2022, with the intent of limiting Russia’s economic leverage on the EU.[i] In February 2022, 45% of EU natural gas imports came from Russia; currently, Russian gas imports have fallen to only 13% of the EU’s imports.[ii] Despite the impressive decline, EU nations’ economic dependence on Russian natural gas remains a strategic liability. While the commitment of EU leadership is clear, the EU remains a major importer of piped natural gas. The European Union has responded decisively to this challenge by adopting its 19th round of sanctions, which includes a complete Russian LNG import ban.[iii] Furthermore, on October 20th, the European Council proposed an updated version of the REPowerEU, which calls for an end to pipeline natural gas imports from the Turkstream pipeline by 2028.[iv] These two measures represent significant steps toward degrading the finances of the Russian war machine, which has caused 14,383 Ukrainian civilian deaths.[v]

    The need for further action by the EU is driven by the impact of EU gas consumption on the Russian military machine. While the EU has limited its economic exposure to Russia, it remains a significant customer of Russian energy products. The EU consumes 50% of Russia’s LNG exports and 35% of its pipeline gas exports, via the Turkstream pipeline system.[vi]  In 2023, 32% of the Russian budget revenues came from oil and gas; all EU countries must understand that the rubles from these sales can be used to import Iranian drones and missiles that indiscriminately kill thousands of civilians in Ukraine.[vii] The largest EU consumers of Russian gas are Slovakia and Hungary.[viii];[ix] Significantly, Hungary has a long-term contract with Gazprom, the Russian state-owned natural gas provider, until 2036 which directly contravenes the RePowerEU plan. Despite successes with REPowerEU over the past few years, EU member states purchasing gas via the Turkstream pipeline continue to undermine EU security goals by supporting the Russian economy, government, and war efforts. The critical questions that EU policymakers now face are whether sanctions can: 1) affect change in regime behavior, 2) hinder the war-making capacity of a hostile power, and 3) be properly enforced. While the morality of sanctions on Russia is clear, scholars are divided on their effectiveness. The debate centers on whether bad actors such as China and Iran can mitigate the impact of export controls by selling Russia dual-use technologies.[x] Furthermore, the Russian economy is both large and well prepared for sanctions.[xi] EU sanctions have impacted the Russian treasury and economy in the past, but their slow pace of implementation, paired with the EU’s indecisiveness, has weakened their ability to deter and degrade the Russian capacity to invade Ukraine.[xii] 

    The EU has the capacity to implement these measures, but it will be difficult. For the REPowerEU updates to take effect, they must pass the European Parliament (EP). Sanctions enforcement with LNG will be especially challenging because the Russian State will go to extreme lengths to evade their consequences.[xiii] For example, Russia could expand its Shadow Fleet operations to include the illegal transportation of LNG. The Russian Shadow Fleet is made up of hundreds of oil tankers that have fake identification documents, no insurance, and frequently change their country of registration.[xiv] This strategy allows them to evade European and American sanctions on Russian oil and potentially sell oil to European customers. Russia could also expand its use of friendly third parties to mask the origin of the Russian LNG. These necessary sanctions will require skillful diplomacy from the European Commission and national leaders. Countries such as Hungary and Slovakia will resist the end of gas imports, so overcoming these objections in the EP will be a major challenge for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. If EU leaders deliver the RePowerEU and implement sanctions, the economic pressure it will put on Russia can both free the EU from the shackles of Russian blackmail and degrade Russian finances used for the war.

    These decisive actions will finally end the poisonous politics brought by the presence of Russian energy in the EU. The end of pipeline natural gas is especially significant as these energy streams are not easily diverted. By removing 288 million euros a month of exports and removing a major customer of Russian LNG, this would be a major, direct hit to the Russian state’s finances.[xv] The greatest challenges to these sanctions will be overcoming both the Hungarian and Slovak opposition, as well as opposition within the upcoming negotiations between the European Commission and the European Parliament. [xvi] Ultimately, the most recent sanctions package and the upcoming legislation on Russian gas imports are both critical to Russia’s wartime success; if the EU wants the war to end, it should decisively and uniformly act on passing an updated REPowerEU. Once the EU is free of Russian gas, it can truly commit to aiding the Ukrainian war effort and opposing Russia’s coercion against EU members.


    [i] Ursula von der Leyen, speech, European Commission Press Corner, “Speech 22 5389” (April 2022), accessed October 6, 2025, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/it/speech_22_5389.

    [ii] European Commission, *REPowerEU* (web page), accessed October 6, 2025, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/energy/repowereu_en.

    [iii] European Commission, “EU Adopts New Sanctions against Russia,” October 23, 2025, https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/eu-adopts-new-sanctions-against-russia-2025-10-23_en.

    [iv] European Commission, “REPowerEU,” accessed November 2, 2025. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/energy/repowereu_en.

    [v] https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/Ukraine-s-Civilians-Face-Daily-Death-and-Injury-Amid-Intense-Attacks-UN-Human-Rights-Monitors-Say.

    [vi] Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, “August 2025 — Monthly Analysis of Russian Fossil Fuel Exports and Sanctions,” September 11, 2025, accessed October 6, 2025, https://energyandcleanair.org/august-2025-monthly-analysis-of-russian-fossil-fuel-exports-and-sanctions/.

    [vii] Vitaly Yermakov, “Follow the Money: Understanding Russia’s Oil and Gas Revenues,” Oxford Energy Comment (Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, March 2024), https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Follow-the-Money-Russian-Oil.pdf.

    [viii] International Energy Agency, “Hungary: Energy Mix,” accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.iea.org/countries/hungary.

    [ix] International Energy Agency, “Slovak Republic: Energy Mix,” accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.iea.org/countries/slovak-republic/energy-mix.

    [x] Itskhoki, Oleg, and Elina Ribakova. “The Economics of Sanctions: From Theory into Practice.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall 2024: 425-470.

    [xi] Ibid.

    [xii] Ibid.

    [xiii] The Flashing Red Threat from Russia’s Dark Fleet.” The Economist, September 30, 2025. https://www.economist.com/international/2025/09/30/the-flashing-red-threat-from-russias-dark-fleet.

    [xiv] Ibid.

    [xv] Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, “August 2025 — Monthly Analysis of Russian Fossil Fuel Exports and Sanctions,” September 11, 2025, accessed October 6, 2025, https://energyandcleanair.org/august-2025-monthly-analysis-of-russian-fossil-fuel-exports-and-sanctions/.

    [xvi] Aura Sabadus, “Europe Finally Moves to Ban Russian Gas but Potential Loopholes Remain,” Atlantic Council (blog), October 23, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/europe-finally-moves-to-ban-russian-gas-but-potential-loopholes-remain/.


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

    Lucas Vroege

    Lucas is a GGPS student focusing on energy political economy and holds dual US-Netherlands nationality.

  • CSO Perspectives on Remedy Pathways for Fishers and Fisher Involvement in IUU Reporting

    Image Source: Pexels; https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-of-anchor-17485780/

    By Carlye Goldman, Natalie Leonard, and Elizabeth Parker

    This report outlines research gaps and best practices in recruitment oversight- drawing on case studies and interviews with civil society organizations (CSOs)- and explores how CSOs help fishers exercise their voice and agency, and how fishers with a stronger voice in their sector can protect both fishers’ rights and, potentially, the fisheries.


    As part of All Hands on Deck: Protections for Fishers in the Seafood Industry—the fourth edition of a collaboration with the Accountability Research Center and the Fisheries Governance Project—this report examines the systemic challenges migrant and distant-water fishers face in the global seafood supply chain, including exploitative recruitment, poor working conditions, limited access to remedy, and weak rights enforcement. Drawing on case studies and interviews with civil society organizations (CSOs), it highlights best practices in recruitment oversight, how non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and unions are helping fishers exercise their agency, and how fishers with a stronger voice can protect fishers’ rights and, potentially, the fisheries. The research focuses on two areas: (First) effective grievance mechanisms and steps companies can take to ensure fair, accessible processes, and (Secondly) whether fishers can safely contribute to reporting Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing.

    List of Acronyms

    AcronymFull Meaning
    AISAutomatic Identification System
    ILO C188ILO Convention 188 (Work in Fishing Convention)
    CSOCivil Society Organization
    DWFDistant Water Fleet
    ETFEuropean Transport Workers’ Federation
    FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    ILOInternational Labour Organization
    IUUIllegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (fishing)
    NGONon-Governmental Organization
    SBMISerikat Buruh Migran Indonesia (Indonesian Migrant Workers’ Union)
    UNGPsUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
    Wi-FiWireless Fidelity (used in the context of onboard communication access)

    Recruitment: The Gateway for Fisher Exploitation  

    In the global seafood supply chain, recent efforts have prioritized increasing product traceability and transparency to ensure quality and sustainability. However, significant gaps remain in extending these measures to labor practices. Profit-incentivized cost-cutting within this industry encourages exploitative recruitment practices, jeopardizing worker safety and increasing risk of labor abuses.1 Despite the efforts of fisher rights advocates, corporate interests, and legislative efforts to increase transparency, many recruitment processes within the industrial seafood supply chain remain veiled, perpetuating the exploitation of a vulnerable workforce as migrant populations are targeted to crew fishing fleets. 

    While fisher unions fight for their members’ rights to collective bargaining and grievance remediation, their efforts are hindered by a lack of transparency surrounding vessel ownership and opacity within the fisher-to-vessel recruitment pipeline.2 The complexity of this pipeline underscores the need to coordinate among Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), not only across data-driven and union approaches, but also across borders. An analysis of corporate policies, however, found that few companies are grappling with the multiple layers described below.3

    Figure 1: Seafood Labor Supply Chain4

    Figure 2: Recruitment Pathway of a Migrant Fisher5, 6, 7  

    Graphic made by report authors.

    From Freedom to Forced Labor: The Path of a Migrant Fisher from Recruitment to Entrapment

    Figure 2 expands upon Figure 1, the seafood labor supply chain diagram from Gearhart (2023), which identified the need for customers to review the labor practices of both vessels and recruitment agencies.8 Further research revealed that there are often two recruitment agencies involved, one in the fisher’s home country (sending country), and one in the vessel’s home country (receiving country).9, 10, 11 While this diagram portrays the recruitment process up to when the fisher boards the vessel, it doesn’t capture the repatriation process (how the fisher returns home), a critical stage where many fishers face continued risks of exploitation and rights violations as they often struggle to secure compensation.12

    Recruitment agencies often first reach prospective fishers through informal brokers who recruit young men within their local villages and receive a cut of the fisher’s recruitment fees as compensation.13 The Union of Indonesian Migrant Workers (Serikat Buruh Migran Indonesia, SBMI), the largest migrant worker organization in Indonesia—noted that since 2017, many of these recruitment agencies are also posting job vacancies on Facebook and WhatsApp groups to reach their workforce.14 Labor abuses begin in this early stage of recruitment, as fishers are lured by false promises and coerced into signing misleading or inaccurate contracts.

    Once connected, fishers rely on the recruitment agency in their home country for services such as help securing immigration documents and transportation to the vessel (which may not be in the vessel’s flag state).15 Upon arrival in the port country, migrant fishers are transferred to a local recruitment agency, increasing the risk of incurring more fees. SBMI shared that recruitment fees can amount to $1,200 US dollars—a staggering sum for workers who may be paid $175 USD per month on the vessel.16 These fees are a root cause of forced labor, as workers often take out high-interest loans to pay them, creating enormous amounts of debt.17 Furthermore, fishers on distant-water fleets (DWF) are often contracted and paid by their recruitment agency, affording agencies the power to deduct fees and any additional expenses from fishers’ wages, trapping them in a cycle of debt bondage.

    Recruitment is a critical entry point where migrant fishers often face the greatest vulnerability. Fishing vessel owners frequently rely on third-party recruitment agencies to staff their vessels, yet oversight of these agents remains weak and inconsistent.18 While international guidelines, like those outlined in the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Convention 188 (C188) and ILO Convention 181 (C181), offer frameworks for ethical recruitment, they are not uniformly adopted or enforced. Fishing companies are encouraged to screen agencies rigorously to prevent exploitation, selecting those that refrain from recruitment fees, provide contracts (written in a language the fisher understands) in advance, and adhere to document retention policies that comply with national laws.19 Nonetheless, many fishers report having their passports confiscated, being misled about wages, or unknowingly signing contracts they cannot read.20 The lack of standard legal safeguards, particularly in jurisdictions where recruitment agents operate with minimal or lax regulation, creates a breeding ground for abuse.

    Non-binding practical documents that fishing companies are encouraged to use (e.g., toolkits, checklists) recommend detailed self-assessments before hiring, such as defining required qualifications, verifying agent accreditation, and checking for grievance mechanisms that are accessible to migrant workers.21 Yet, gaps persist, especially for illiterate or non-native language speakers who may need legal interpretation or support services. Without proper onboarding, orientation, and legal protections, fishers are often deployed under exploitative arrangements without recourse. Tools like model employment contracts, secure document storage, and transparent repatriation procedures exist on paper but are rarely implemented at scale.22 True recruitment reform requires stronger compliance enforcement by flag states, formal mechanisms for worker complaints, and solutions that center the fisher’s experience from the outset. 

    When the Gateway Becomes a Gatekeeper: Rights Denial and Worker Voice Suppression

    These recruitment practices impede fishers’ ability to exercise their voice and rights to bargain collectively, access effective grievance mechanisms, and secure remedy. As fishers on the DWF are often contracted by the recruitment agency in their home country, and not the vessel owners directly, they are unable to bargain collectively with the captain or vessel owners for better working conditions.23 Because they often work on vessels flagged to countries other than their own, tracing and holding abusive parties accountable is difficult.24 This situation complicates the ability of fishers and unions to file for and secure remedy, especially as recruitment agencies and vessel owners often try to avoid commitments to remedy grievances. SBMI confirmed this reality, sharing that even when they contact and ask recruitment agencies to remedy fisher grievances—as required by Indonesian Law 18/2017—these agencies are unlikely to respond. 25

    Furthermore, in cases where migrant fishers’ visas are tied to their employment, such as in Taiwan, fishers are often discouraged from transferring vessels, no matter the working conditions, for fear of deportation if their contract is terminated.26 These conditions deter fishers from speaking out about poor working environments, knowing that voicing a complaint could result in their contract’s termination and deportation upon arrival at port. If sent back to their home country, they would need to completely restart the costly recruitment process if they wished to work as fishers again.

    CSO Strategies for Recruitment Reform

    On both the international and domestic fronts, CSOs have a major role to play in reforming exploitative recruitment practices within the global seafood supply chain. CSOs, including trade unions, membership-based organizations, and NGOs, advance workers’ rights by strengthening community action and worker agency. Membership-based CSOs employ a “whole-of-worker” approach, using strategies to prevent abuses, secure remedy, and support overall well-being through fostering community.27 Unions and worker organizations are key to progress, providing critical support to fishers by upholding their rights to collective bargaining and making grievance mechanisms accessible. They also monitor labor abuse reporting, fight to secure remedy, and hold governments and employers accountable.28 These CSOs are thus essential for worker empowerment, which catalyzes meaningful, sustainable change.

    The Union of Indonesian Migrant Workers (SBMI) indicated that their work goes beyond advocacy. It includes supporting grassroots fisher organizing and educating migrant fishers on their rights at all stages of the employment process from recruitment to work overseas.29 They also offer training for migrant fishers on how to address a violation of their rights on the vessel and where to go if they aren’t receiving their funds from the recruitment agency. Migrant fishers who have benefited from this sort of training enter the field with a greater understanding of their rights and are able to engage their recruitment agencies directly, asking questions to clarify terms within their employment contracts, payment mechanisms, and insurance.30 

    Many NGOs serve as partners to fisher organizers by developing campaigns centered around the goals and concerns of fisher organizations. However, Gearhart and Moynihan argue that because fisher-led solutions are key to sustained change, CSO efforts must focus on supporting national fisher unions’ efforts to build their power and strengthen fishers’ collective voice.31

    Worker Voice

    International labor standards are built upon the foundational principle that workers should have the right to organize, voice demands, and negotiate for improved working conditions. The International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (ILO 1998) defines these respective freedoms—of association, organization, and collective bargaining—as “basic workers’ rights.”32 Scholars define this ability of workers to express their concerns and exercise collective agency to improve the terms and conditions of their work as “worker voice.” 33

    Several advocates for decent work have expressed concern about the overuse or misuse of the term “worker voice.”34 Across sectors, it has been used to refer to the tools and systems through which workers can express concerns and offer feedback within their supply chains. But these tools are diverse, varying in use and effectiveness. They range from suggestion boxes, worker hotlines, employee surveys, and corporate responsibility efforts, to labor unions, collective bargaining agreements, and enforceable brand agreements.35 While the term has been used by practitioners, policymakers, and scholars to refer generally to any form of worker participation, effective worker voice mechanisms must be identified.

    What Are Effective Worker-Voice Mechanisms?

    According to Anner and colleagues, worker voice is “the capacity of workers to speak up, articulate, and manifest collective agency to improve the terms and conditions of work and livelihoods and to contribute to more equitable and democratic societies”.36 Mechanisms that most effectively enable worker voice are those that “enhance workers’ ability to elect, represent, protect, include, enable, and empower workers and their organizations,” such as democratic trade unions and collective bargaining.37 Within the global seafood supply chain, however, these tools are not always available to workers.

    In the fishing industry’s private sector, there is a growing trend to adopt voluntary, market-driven governance mechanisms to address labor conditions in the seafood supply chain.38 These tools—including ethical standards, labeling systems, certification schemes, and codes of conduct—evaluate performance through social auditing strategies. However, these mechanisms have proven ineffective at transforming working conditions.39 Tools such as audit surveys and complaint mechanisms may appear to be participatory by claiming to ‘enable worker voice,’ yet, they fail to serve workers’ needs. Workers rarely use them effectively, hindered by limited knowledge, lack of trust, and businesses’ dominant control over defining and resolving labor issues.40 These tools treat workers as passive, excluding the people they are intended to protect.41 

    Individual vs. Collective Voice Mechanisms

    Most effective forms of worker voice mechanisms promote collective, democratic representation, where workers are actively engaged, informed, and empowered. Individual voice mechanisms, like suggestion boxes and digital surveys, don’t carry the same power or credibility as collective voice mechanisms. Individual voice mechanisms are often ineffective at resolving workplace conflicts, especially those related to workers’ rights.42 Individual voice mechanisms, like hotlines, are only effective when paired with collective voice mechanisms, such as democratic trade unions.43 Most individual voice mechanisms exclude workers from participating in conflict resolution processes and deny access to effective remedy.44 Genuine mechanisms must both “capture the voices, experiences, and needs of workers,” and “channel that voice into a clear mechanism for remediation for those workers.”45 Improving working conditions requires incorporating workers’ input at every stage of employment—from recruitment to repatriation—shifting from a ‘worker-centered’ to a ‘worker-driven’ model.46, 47 This transition to a “worker-driven social responsibility paradigm” is critical to redistributing power and prioritizing  worker agency within the seafood industry, thereby helping to protect fishers from exploitation.48 

    CSOs and Worker Voice  

    Both the dangers of marginalizing worker voice and the importance of CSO support to amplify collective voice within global supply chains are exemplified in the 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse in Bangladesh, killing more than 1,100 people.49 Workers had limited union leverage to compel management before the tragedy.50 In countries with the protected right of freedom of association, unions can help prevent disasters like this.51 Within the fishing industry, CSOs’ support for and promotion of collective voice is pivotal to fishers exercising their power. The Global Seafood Alliance’s 2020 report, Worker Voice on Fishing Vessels, highlights the massive power imbalance on fishing vessels and the need for safe, trusted support onboard and onshore.52

    CSOs promote collective voice through varied strategies, including employer engagement, advocacy, campaigning, grassroots organizing, and movement building. These efforts can be represented on a continuum, from fisher-absent NGOs that engage decision-makers with limited fisher involvement, to fully fisher-led advocacy groups. Understanding this spectrum of fisher-involvement within CSO strategies helps contextualize the breadth of contributions to advancing fishers’ rights.

    The CSOs examined in this report represent this spectrum of engagement with fishers. At one end, organizations such as C4ADS and Conservation International operate without much direct involvement with fishers, focusing on data-driven investigations, collaboration with private and public sector actors, and policy advocacy.53, 54 Mid-spectrum organizations like the Issara Institute and Greenpeace blend corporate engagement and public mobilization to influence labor practices within supply chains.55, 56 At the grassroots end of the spectrum, Stella Maris and SBMI exemplify fisher-led operations, supporting collective voice and building collective power through worker organizing and rights education.57, 58 

    While each kind of CSO along this spectrum plays a distinct and valuable role, not all engage directly with fishers.59 The strength of some CSOs closer to the fisher-absent end of the spectrum lies in their ability to contribute information or apply pressure that can help secure remedy for workers.60 Their technical experience and legal expertise, combined with external funding, allow them to help workers file complaints, escape debt bondage, and seek compensation for workplace abuses or injuries.61 However, the impact of CSO efforts may remain narrow and short-term if they are not integrated with the work of fisher-led organizations, including trade unions and membership-based groups, that focus on sustained, long-term organizing. It’s the movement building strategies that can cultivate collective voice, thereby advancing structural and more sustainable change.62 

    The literature reviewed suggests that systemic reform in the global seafood supply chain requires prioritizing collective fisher voice, strengthening organizing rights, and shifting power to fishers themselves. Recently, there has been an uptick in fisher organizing, with many trade unions emerging in the sector.63 Still, challenges remain as many migrant fishers have never been organized and unions struggle to secure membership, dues, and participation.64 Despite obstacles, supporting this work enables fishers to claim power through collective, trusted efforts that foster negotiation, remedy, and broader change. Collective voice is the backbone of sustainable, democratic movement building. When workers are engaged in a trusted, collective effort, they can build the power to negotiate, seek remedy, and create change. Moreover, unions and membership-based organizations create a networked collective with staying power that goes beyond the technical support that an NGO might offer. In an industry of indebted workers, however, it can be difficult for unions to establish self-financing mechanisms.65 Outside resources should be directed toward these types of organizations, albeit carefully coordinated with their establishment of self-financing structures, as they lay the groundwork for lasting transformation.66

    Pathways to Remedy for Fishers

    Remedy is central to achieving justice for fishers subjected to labor abuse and exploitation. It includes restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, and accountability measures. According to the  United Nations Guiding Principles (UNGPs), effective remedy must be legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, rights-compatible, and transparent.67 Yet, in practice, remedy for migrant and distant-water fishers is often inaccessible due to legal loopholes, geographic isolation, and the failure of both state and private actors to implement robust mechanisms.

    Legal frameworks such as International Labour Organization Convention 188 (ILO C188) and the French Duty of Vigilance Law offer protections, but their effectiveness is still limited.68 C188, which establishes basic labor standards for the fishing industry, remains under-enforced, including in countries like Thailand where it was recently ratified in 2019. Moreover, supply chain regulations, such as France’s Duty of Vigilance Law, provide stricter corporate accountability but often fail to reach migrant workers at sea.69 In response, CSOs have stepped in to bridge the gap. Gearhart and Moynihan  argue that remedy must go beyond legal processes to become a collective empowerment strategy rooted in organizing, peer support, and advocacy for stronger legal protection.70 Likewise, Parhusip’s article on “Emerging Port Infrastructure and Advocacy Networks for Migrant Fishers in Taiwan”  underscores the importance of localized, culturally informed engagement at ports, where intermediary actors, such as local NGOs or unions, can support fishers asserting their rights.71 

    Grievance Mechanisms: Barriers and Risks to Remedy

    Accessible grievance mechanisms are a prerequisite for meaningful remedy. Unfortunately, current mechanisms available to fishers are often inaccessible, mistrusted, or ineffective. While many companies promote hotlines and audits, these systems frequently fail due to language gaps, poor connectivity, employer control, and lack of follow-up.72,  73 Without trusted, independent mechanisms, fishers are unlikely to report abuse.

    Key barriers to fishers’ ability to file grievances and secure remedy include debt bondage, document confiscation, and misinformation during recruitment, often via informal networks like Facebook.74 There is also fear of retaliation, especially amongst fishers on DWFs, due to isolation. CSOs report cases in which workers faced blacklisting, physical threats, abusive punishments, or denial of disembarkation after reporting. Even where legal frameworks exist, enforcement is inconsistent, as agencies and vessel owners often evade liability through complex subcontracting arrangements. These conditions show why grievance systems must be trusted, accessible, and legally protected with independent oversight.75, 76, 77

    Promising Pathways and Institutional Support

    In spite of obstacles, effective pathways to remedy do exist and are being developed for future implementation. SBMI has created a three-step grievance process, rooted in Indonesia’s national labor law, starting with demand letters, followed by tripartite mediation, and, if needed, escalation through criminal complaints under trafficking statutes.78 Their approach builds on peer networks, with many migrant workers returning to help others, making them trusted intermediaries with knowledge of national law and experience seeking remedy.79 While limited by funding and jurisdictional gaps, SBMI emphasizes that remedy must be continuous and supported not only by formal complaint channels but also by preventative efforts like legal orientation and pre-departure education.80 These outreach activities seek to prevent grievances by helping workers avoid exploitative recruitment and fostering agency.

    While these local civil society organizations are critical to direct service and organizing, broader institutional reform also depends on globally oriented NGOs with capacity for high-level policy advocacy and research. Organizations like CI and C4ADS contribute by developing tools to strengthen fisher protections. CI promotes the integration of labor protections into governments’ implementation of the Port State Measures Agreement.81 C4ADS underscores the need for monitoring platforms to also capture labor abuses.82 The C4ADS database, Triton, only focuses on vessel ownership and IUU reporting, but that information could be used by unions like SBMI to help them pursue remedy even if the vessel disappears or claims bankruptcy.83 These NGOs, along with Greenpeace, also highlighted that greater collaboration and resource-sharing among CSOs is needed, as fragmented efforts limit the ability to address labor violations holistically.84

    Research by Wilhelm et al. and Parhusip further underlines that grievance mechanisms disconnected from community realities are unlikely to succeed.85, 86 Top-down hotlines and audits often fail to win worker trust or deliver remedy because they do not account for the occupational realities, language needs, or social networks of migrant fishers.87 In contrast, community-embedded actors closely connected to fisher communities are identified as more trusted and effective in responsiveness and harm prevention.88 Integrating these community-rooted practices into formal remedy frameworks is thus essential for building legitimacy and ensuring fishers’ collective voices guide accountability efforts.

    Technology is also a rapidly advancing catalyst for remedy, but it only succeeds when carefully implemented into broader grievance support systems. Wi-Fi and electronic monitoring (EM) can enable communication, document abuse, and enhance oversight.89, 90 Further, complaint apps, such as Issara Institute’s Golden Dreams mobile app, allow workers to report abuse anonymously in multiple languages, demonstrating the promise of digital platforms particularly when they are paired with follow-up support.91 Still, connectivity issues limit the app’s reach, as Wi-Fi is rare on distant-water vessels.92 Satellite Wi-Fi systems also remain costly, with monthly data plans ranging from $250 to $5,000 per vessel depending on usage, installation, logistics, and bandwidth needs.93 Still, expanding satellite Wi-Fi on vessels is critical, requiring shared investment from governments, industry, and buyers, alongside policies linking communication access and anti-retaliation protocols to vessel eligibility.94 These technologies function best when integrated alongside port-based support, community-level organizing, and CSO facilitation to reinforce trusted, participatory pathways to remedy.  

    Recommendations on Remedial Pathways

    Current remedy mechanisms for fishers remain fragmented, relying on hotlines and top-down audits that offer individual voice but little systemic reform. Too often they extract information rather than empower workers and connect them to collective voice structures like unions, leading remedy to remain inaccessible, untrusted, and structurally disempowering.95, 96, 97, 98 These systems are also hampered by language barriers, poor connectivity, and lack of enforcement, leaving workers with few safe paths to report abuse. Effective remedy must rest on enforceable legal frameworks, be accessible at sea and onshore, and be co-governed by fishers. Remedy must also be viewed not as a one-time fix but as a continual, adaptive process responsive to the realities of fishers’ lived experiences.

    Core features of successful remedy systems include accessibility, confidentiality, anti-retaliation protections, worker input, and legal mandates. Strategies to improve access include:

    • Scaling pre-departure education and continuous dialogue amongst fishers and stakeholders
    • Integrating unions and other membership-based organizations’ grievance systems
    • Ensuring Wi-Fi and EM access on vessels
    • Mandating labor metrics in port inspections
    • Promoting greater transparency in recruitment and vessel ownership
    • Strengthening coordination among unions, NGOs, and fisher organizations 

    Table 1 highlights targeted strategies towards some of the most pressing barriers fishers face while at sea for long periods of time. 

    Table 1. Targeted Solutions to Barriers on Remedy

    While not exhaustive, this table illustrates examples of interventions that have proven promising or successful in specific contexts.99 The table also clarifies which actors are best positioned to implement each solution and highlights areas where further investment or innovation is needed. It offers a practical reference to guide future remedy efforts and support more strategic, coordinated responses. Overall, remedy must be grounded in fisher realities, not externally enforced frameworks.

    IUU Reporting: What if Worker Voice Were Truly Free?

    In an ideal world, where fishers were able to communicate with trusted representatives without fear of reprisals, they might help address IUU fishing. “IUU has been recognized by the United Nations as one of the seven major threats to world maritime security.”100 The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) defines IUU: 

    1. Illegal Fishing refers to fishing activity carried out without permission by foreign vessels in waters under the jurisdiction of another state, or in any other way that violates that state’s fisheries law and regulations; 

    2. Unreported Fishing refers to fishing that is not officially recorded; and 

    3. Unregulated Fishing refers to fishing activities carried out in areas where no applicable management measures exist.101

    Advocates have argued that identification of labor rights abuses should trigger IUU investigations.102 Fishers, often closest to such violations, could help report IUU fishing if they had the freedom and protection to speak out.103 Though still a nascent concept in combating IUU fishing, fishers’ proximity to both human rights violations and legal infractions gives them a potentially valuable role in fostering transparency and accountability within seafood supply chains, if they could safely participate.

    Chapsos and Hamilton’s (2019) study of Indonesian IUU networks reinforces this potential.104 Based on data from over 2,000 trafficked fishers, they show how IUU operations often rely on deceptive recruitment, forged documents, and coercive control to secure compliant labor and evade regulation. Another study concludes that trafficked fishers, if given protections, could serve as key witnesses to expose criminal fishing networks.105

    The Link Between Labor Abuse and IUU Fishing

    Labor exploitation and IUU fishing are deeply interconnected, with exploitative practices reducing costs while sustaining illegal fishing. A critical part of this system is the role of unregulated labor recruitment agencies acting as intermediaries between desperate migrant workers and vessel operators seeking cheap, compliant crews.106 Vessel owners intending to engage in IUU might seek out recruiters that will supply workers who are indebted, unaware of their rights, and unlikely to resist abusive conditions.107 This mutual dependency allows both to evade regulation: agencies profit regardless of legal compliance, while operators exploit a silent, invisible workforce.108 This arrangement illustrates how labor exploitation is not an unfortunate consequence but a structural necessity for IUU fishing. 

    Beyond recruitment, many fishers receive little or no training, limiting their ability to recognize and report illegal activities like bycatch or finning.109 This overlap between labor exploitation and IUU fishing highlights the urgent need for integrated monitoring systems that address environmental violations and human rights abuses together through coordinated strategies.

    Currently, IUU detection relies on technologies like Vessel Monitoring Systems, Automatic Identification Systems (AIS), port inspections, and company audits, mainly targeting larger vessels.110 Yet audits often overlook labor conditions, prioritizing documentation over worker experience.111 As Nakamura et al. (2018) note, “the hands pulling fish from the net disappear from sight,” showing how supply chain audits miss fishers’ realities.112 Likewise, AIS data provides limited insight into vessel operations and labor conditions.113 These gaps highlight the need for systems centered on worker-generated data, with fisher-led reporting emerging as a crucial tool to improve transparency and enforcement across vessel types. The 2025 Monitoring for Change Report also finds that EM using cameras, sensors, and GPS can capture labor indicators at sea but faces challenges in reviewing-capacity and cost.

    Unfortunately, the idea may be ahead of its time. Despite its potential, fisher-led reporting remains risky. Greenpeace USA experts stress that expecting vulnerable fishers to monitor IUU without training, protection, or support is unrealistic and potentially dangerous.114 They highlighted dangers like retaliation, blacklisting, job loss, and violence.115 Interviews consistently highlight dangers like retaliation, blacklisting, job loss, and violence. Recruitment conditions exacerbate fears: debts, lack of contracts, and identification make fishers reluctant to speak out. Social and moral pressures also discourage reporting.116 Without legal protections, labor enforcement, and CSO support, fisher-led reporting is often unsafe and infeasible.

    Conditions for Safe and Effective Reporting

    The recruitment supply chain is complex, requiring multiple strategies to mitigate risks (outlined in Table 1). Safe, effective fisher-led reporting requires legal protections, recruitment oversight, anonymous reporting mechanisms, and remediation pathways. Long-term success also hinges on fishers’ ability to build power and strengthen their collective voice.

    CSOs vary in approach, some favor collective bargaining, others prioritize individualized grievance channels like hotlines or digital platforms. Despite these differences, many agree that centering fisher voice and agency is essential.117 Within this broader ecosystem, CSOs can play a vital role as facilitators, watchdogs, and advocates, ensuring fisher-led reporting is both possible and protected. If these groups can coordinate successfully and ensure effective protections for fishers who seek to speak out, they might also find pathways to preventing IUU.

    Conclusion  

    Across every stage of the seafood supply chain, fishers face power imbalances compounded by isolation at sea, language barriers, debt, and threat of retaliation. While international legal frameworks, like ILO C188 and the UNGPs, provide important benchmarks, enforcement remains patchy and insufficient. As such, the lived experiences and voices of fishers often remain disconnected from the very systems designed to protect them. 

    CSOs have stepped in to fill these accountability gaps, providing grassroots advocacy, legal support, and technology-based solutions. Yet, their efforts remain constrained by limited funding and uncoordinated approaches between CSOs. Collective voice is key to overcoming structural power imbalances and ensuring grievance systems are effective. Without it, individual workers must navigate complex, high-risk complaint processes alone, often facing retaliation and rarely seeing resolution. 

    To address these challenges, three central reforms consistently surfaced throughout desk research and targeted interviews. Governments and corporations must support fisher organizing and embed worker voice across the supply chain by involving fishers in policy design and ensuring technologies like Wi-Fi and EM serve their needs. Recruitment systems should eliminate debt, ensure transparent contracts, and hold brokers accountable, with governments enforcing fair standards, employers ensuring debt-free hiring, and CSOs monitoring compliance. Access to remedy must be through CSO supported grievance systems that are anonymous, multilingual, trusted, and backed by legal enforcement mechanisms with companies taking proactive steps to ensure these systems are fair and accessible.

    All in all, true change will require sustained, structural shifts that redistribute power to the people most impacted by exploitation. Fishers are not just sources of labor or victims of abuse. They are critical knowledge-holders with the experience to drive ethical reform with real impact. Fishers could also be allies in the fight to end illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, but to do so, they need a voice and the means to raise concerns without fear of retaliation. Protecting their rights is not only a legal imperative, but a practical necessity for building a just and sustainable seafood industry.

     Notes

    1. Judy Gearhart, ed. 2023. “A Deeper Dive: Remedy and Recruitment in the Seafood Industry.” By Kelcey AllenRodriguez, Sloane Hardin, Suhyeon Kim, Victoria Latham, Olivia Mar, Carla Montilla, Connor Moynihan, Heather Mullen, Kiley Nivens, and Matthew Ridgeway. Unpublished report on behalf of Fisheries Governance Project. https://accountabilityresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Final-Paper_FGP-5-24-23.pdf.
    2. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    3. Judy Gearhart and Connor Moynihan, ed. 2025. All Hands On Deck: Protections for Fishers in the Seafood Industry. Jeidy Barrios. Nicole Bernard, Jill Coleman, Parker Elizabeth, Judy Gearhart, Carlye Goldman, Natalie Leonard, Robert Menner, Jessica Mensah-Brown, Siobhan Powers, Aisha Tewfik. Accountability Research Center.
    4. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    5. Rizky Oktaviana, Ade Herlina, Feliana Fauziyyah, Juwarih, Novia Kirana, and Adrian Basar (SBMI), interviewed by Natalie Leonard and Elizabeth Parker, Zoom, July 17, 2025.
    6. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    7. Judy Gearhart and Connor Moynihan. 2025. Upwelling: Fishers Organizing for their Rights and Sustainable Fisheries. Accountability Research Center. Report. https://doi.org/10.57912/28616345
    8. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    9. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    10. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    11. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    12. Greenpeace Southeast Asia. Forced Labour at Sea: The Case of Indonesian Migrant Fishers. 31 May 2021. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-southeastasia-stateless/2021/05/ef65bfe1-greenpeace-2021-forced-labour-at-sea-digital_final.pdf
    13. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    14. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    15. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    16. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    17. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    18. European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF). Recruitment of Migrant Fishers. Brussels: European Transport Workers’ Federation, 2024. https://www.etf-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Recruitment-of-migrant-fishers.pdf
    19. European Transport Workers’ Federation, Recruitment of Migrant Fishers.
    20. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    21. European Transport Workers’ Federation, Recruitment of Migrant Fishers.
    22. European Transport Workers’ Federation, Recruitment of Migrant Fishers.
    23. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    24. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    25. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    26. Johanna Lee. 2025. “Fisher Organizing In Taiwan: A Country Case Study.” Accountability Research Center. https://accountabilityresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Fisher-Organizing-in-Taiwan_Final.pdf 
    27. Gearhart, Judy. 2023. “Building Worker Power in Global Supply Chains: Lessons from Apparel, Cocoa, and Seafood.” Accountability Research Center. Accountability Working Paper 15. DOI: 10.57912/23931795
    28. Gearhart, Building Worker Power in Global Supply Chains.
    29. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    30. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    31. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    32. International Labour Organization (ILO). 1998. ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and Its Follow-Up. Adopted 18 June 1998; annex revised 15 June 2010. Geneva: International Labour Office.
    33. M. Anner, M. Fischer-Daly, S. Amita, K. Maich, S. Okyere, and Y. Yint. 2023. Worker Voice:   What it is, what it is not, and why it matters. Center for Global Workers’ Rights, The Pennsylvania State University: University Park. https://ler.la.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/04/Penn-State-Worker-Voice-Report-Dec.-19-Final_amended_mfd_23March2024-2.pdf
    34. Anner et al., Worker Voice.
    35. Anner et al., Worker Voice.
    36. Anner et al., Worker Voice, 5.
    37. Anner et al., Worker Voice.
    38. Jessica L. Decker Sparks, Lee Matthews, Daniel Cárdenas, and Chris Williams. 2022. “Worker-less social responsibility: How the proliferation of voluntary labour governance tools in seafood marginalise the workers they claim to protect.” Marine Policy 139 : 105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105044 
    39. Sparks et al., “Worker-less Social Responsibility.”
    40. Sabrina Zajak. 2017. “Channels for workers’ voice in the transnational governance of labour rights?.” Global Policy 8, no. 4 : 530-539. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1758-5899.12465#:~:text=https%3A//doi.org/10.1111/1758%2D5899.12465 
    41. Sparks et al., “Worker-less Social Responsibility.”
    42. Anner et al., Worker Voice.
    43. Anner et al., Worker Voice.
    44. Anner et al., Worker Voice.
    45. Issara Institute. 2022. (B.) What is ‘Worker Voice’ in the Context of Global Supply Chains? Issara Institute. https://www.issarainstitute.org/_files/ugd/5bf36e_6fc0dc487c5c4e3ca6680aaf535259f7.pdf.
    46. Opi Outhwaite and Olga Martin-Ortega. 2019. “Worker-driven monitoring–Redefining supply chain monitoring to improve labour rights in global supply chains.” Competition & Change 23, no. 4 (2019): 378-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529419865690
    47. Issara Institute. 2022. (A.) Worker Voice-Driven Ethical Recruitment Toolkit. Bangkok and Palo Alto: Issara Institute. https://www.issarainstitute.org/_files/ugd/5bf36e_fb28c5a7e4a14e9888ba6dee8efc951e.pdf 
    48. Sparks et al., “Worker-less Social Responsibility.”
    49. Bennett Freeman, Sif Thorgeirsson, Adele Barzelay, and Brooks Reed. 2018. Shared Space under Pressure: Business Support for Civic Freedoms and Human Rights Defenders. London: Business & Human Rights Resource Centre and the International Service for Human Rights. https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ed628efe9bd9cb15e834c62b7a9b189d7d0ea6b9.pdf 
    50. Freeman et al., Shared Space under Pressure.
    51. Freeman et al., Shared Space under Pressure, 71.
    52. Global Seafood Alliance. 2022. White Paper on Worker Voice on Fishing Vessels. https://www.globalseafood.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GSA-White-Paper-on-Worker-Voice-on-Fishing-Vessels-Complete-004.pdf.
    53. Bruno Monteferri (Conservation International), interviewed by Carlye Goldman, Natalie Leonard, and Elizabeth Parker, Zoom, June 30, 2025.
    54. Erica Cherepko and Mia Hoskins (C4ADS), interviewed by Carlye Goldman and Natalie Leonard, Zoom, June 18, 2025.
    55. Issara Institute. “The Issara Model.” https://www.issarainstitute.org/the-issara-model
    56. Greenpeace USA. “Issues.” https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/issues/
    57. Oktaviana et al., interview by Leonard and Parker.
    58. Stella Maris. “What We Do.” https://stellamaris.org.uk/what-we-do/
    59. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    60. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    61. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    62. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    63. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    64. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    65. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    66. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    67. United Nations, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework (Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2011). https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/wg-business/access-remedy.
    68. International Labour Organization (ILO). Work in Fishing Convention, 2007 (No. 188), adopted June 14, 2007, Geneva: International Labour Office, https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312333
    69. Miriam Wilhelm, Vikram Bhakoo, Vivek Soundararajan, Andrew Crane, and Alin Kadfak. 2024. “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance: The Role of Social Intermediaries in Mitigating Forced Labour in Global Supply Chains.” Production and Operations Management 34, no. 5 (February 8, 2024): 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478231224922
    70. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    71. Parhusip, Jonathan. 2023. “Emerging Port Infrastructure and Advocacy Networks for Migrant Fishers in Taiwan.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 32, no. 2 (June 2023): 371–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/01171968231191468
    72. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance.”
    73. Sparks et al., “Worker-less Social Responsibility.”
    74. Parhusip, “Emerging Port Infrastructure.”
    75. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance.”
    76. Sparks et al., “Worker-less Social Responsibility.”
    77. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    78. Oktaviana et al., interviewed by Leonard and Parker.
    79. Parhusip, “Emerging Port Infrastructure.”
    80. Oktaviana et al., interviewed by Leonard and Parker.
    81. Monteferri, interviewed by Goldman, Leonard, and Parker.
    82. Cherepko and Hoskins, interviewed by Goldman and Leonard.
    83. Oktaviana et al., interviewed by Leonard and Parker.
    84. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance.”
    85. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance.”
    86. Parhusip, “Emerging Port Infrastructure.”
    87. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance,” 1096.
    88. Parhusip, “Emerging Port Infrastructure,” 379.
    89. The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International, Global Fishing Watch, and Ocean Outcomes, Monitoring for Change: Insights from a Pilot on Electronic Monitoring and Wi-Fi Solutions for Social Responsibility (April 2025), 5.
    90. Global Labor Justice, Model Operational Guidelines for Wi-Fi Access and Fishers’ Rights on Distant Water Fishing Vessels (February 2025), 4. https://globallaborjustice.org/media/uploads/2025/04/WiFi_Guidelines_2025_02.pdf.
    91. Global Labor Justice, Model Operational Guidelines for Wi-Fi Access and Fishers’ Rights on Distant Water Fishing Vessels.
    92. The Nature Conservancy et al., Monitoring for Change, 34.
    93. The Nature Conservancy et al., Monitoring for Change, 22.
    94. The Nature Conservancy et al., Monitoring for Change, 41.
    95. Anner et al., Worker Voice.
    96. Sparks et al., “Worker-less Social Responsibility.”
    97. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance.”
    98. Parhusip, “Emerging Port Infrastructure.”
    99. Oktaviana et al., interviewed by Leonard and Parker.
    100. Adam Leonardo and Nowar Deeb, “Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in Indonesia: Problems and Solutions,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1081 (2022): https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012013/pdf
    101. Adam Leonardo and Nowar Deeb, “Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in Indonesia: Problems and Solutions.”
    102. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance.”
    103. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.
    104. Ioannis Chapsos and Simon Hamilton, “Illegal Fishing and Fisheries Crime as a Transnational Organized Crime in Indonesia,” Trends in Organized Crime 22 (2019): 255–273, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-018-9329-8.
    105. Adam Leonardo and Nowar Deeb, “Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in Indonesia: Problems and Solutions.”
    106. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    107. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    108. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    109. Gearhart, “A Deeper Dive.”
    110. The Nature Conservancy et al., Monitoring for Change.
    111. Wilhelm et al., “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance.”
    112. Katrina Nakamura et al., “Seeing Slavery in Seafood Supply Chains,” Science Advances 4, no. 7 (2018): e1701833, https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/sciadv.1701833.
    113. The Nature Conservancy et al., Monitoring for Change.
    114. Charli Fritzner, Sari Heidenreich (Greenpeace), interviewed by Elizabeth Parker, Natalie Leonard, and Carlye Goldman, Zoom, July 2, 2025.The Nature Conservancy et al., Monitoring for Change.
    115. Charli Fritzner, Sari Heidenreich (Greenpeace), interviewed by Elizabeth Parker, Natalie Leonard, and Carlye Goldman, Zoom, July 2, 2025.
    116. Charli Fritzner, Sari Heidenreich (Greenpeace), interviewed by Elizabeth Parker, Natalie Leonard, and Carlye Goldman, Zoom, July 2, 2025.
    117. Gearhart and Moynihan, Upwelling.

    Bibliography

    Anner, Mark, Mary Fischer-Daly, Surya Amita, Kelsey Maich, Samuel Okyere, Yint Yint. 2023. Worker Voice:     What it is, what it is not, and why it matters. Center for Global Workers’ Rights, The Pennsylvania State University. https://ler.la.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/04/Penn-State-Worker-Voice-Report-Dec.-19-Final_amended_mfd_23March2024-2.pdf 

    Chapsos, Ioannis, and Scot Hamilton. “Illegal fishing and fisheries crime as a transnational organized crime in Indonesia.” Trends in Organized Crime 22, 255–273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-018-9329-8

    Itano, David. 2025. Monitoring for Change: Insights from a Pilot on Electronic Monitoring and Wi-Fi Solutions for Social Responsibility. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International, Global Fishing Watch, and Ocean Outcomes, April 2025.

    Finkbeiner, Elena M, Christopher Giordano, Juno Fitzpatrick, Ashley Apel, Cecilia Blasco, Kathryn H. Dalton, Juan Carlos Jerí, Ines Lopez-Ercilla, Gabrielle E. Lout, Chris Madden, Ivan Martinez-Tovar, Pablo Obregon, Jada Tullos Anderson, John N. Kittinger. 2024. “Insights from a community of practice: Integrating human rights in fisheries improvement.” Marine Policy. Volume 163. 106100. ISSN 0308-597X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106100.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24000988 

    Freeman, Bennett, Sif Thorgeirsson, Adele Barzelay, and Brooks Reed. 2018. Shared Space under Pressure: Business Support for Civic Freedoms and Human Rights Defenders. London: Business & Human Rights Resource Centre and the International Service for Human Rights.https://media.business humanrights.org/media/documents/ed628efe9bd9cb15e834c62b7a9b189d7d0ea6b9.pdf 

    European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF). Recruitment of Migrant Fishers. Brussels: European Transport Workers’ Federation, 2024.  https://www.etf-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Recruitment-of-migrant-fishers.pdf

    Gearhart, Judy, ed. 2023. “A Deeper Dive: Remedy and Recruitment in the Seafood Industry.” By Kelcey AllenRodriguez, Sloane Hardin, Suhyeon Kim, Victoria Latham, Olivia Mar, Carla Montilla, Connor Moynihan, Heather Mullen, Kiley Nivens, and Matthew Ridgeway. Unpublished report on behalf of Fisheries Governance Project. https://accountabilityresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Final-Paper_FGP-5-24-23.pdf.

    Gearhart, Judy, and Moynihan, Connor. 2025. Upwelling: Fishers Organizing for their Rights and Sustainable Fisheries. Accountability Research Center. Report. https://doi.org/10.57912/28616345 

    Global Labor Justice. 2025. Model Operational Guidelines for Wi-Fi Access and Fishers’ Rights on Distant Water Fishing Vessels. February 2025.

    Global Seafood Alliance. 2022. White Paper on Worker Voice on Fishing Vessels. https://www.globalseafood.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GSA-White-Paper-on-Worker-Voice-on-Fishing-Vessels-Complete-004.pdf.

    International Labour Organization (ILO). 1998. ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and Its Follow-Up. Adopted 18 June 1998; annex revised 15 June 2010. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Issara Institute. 2022. (A.) Worker Voice-Driven Ethical Recruitment Toolkit. Bangkok and Palo Alto: Issara Institute. https://www.issarainstitute.org/_files/ugd/5bf36e_fb28c5a7e4a14e9888ba6dee8efc951e.pdf 

    Issara Institute. 2022. (B.) What is ‘Worker Voice’ in the Context of Global Supply Chains? Issara Institute. https://www.issarainstitute.org/_files/ugd/5bf36e_6fc0dc487c5c4e3ca6680aaf535259f7.pdf.

    Kadfak, Alin, and Sebastian Linke. 2022. “More Than Just a Carding System: Labour Implications of the EU’s Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing Policy in Thailand.” Marine Policy 144: 105266. https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271824/1

    Lee, Johanna. 2025. “Fisher Organizing In Taiwan: A Country Case Study.” Accountability Research Center. https://accountabilityresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Fisher-Organizing-in-Taiwan_Final.pdf 

    Leonardo, Adam, and Nowar Deeb. 2022. “Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in Indonesia: Problems and Solutions” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1081 (2022): https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012013/pdf

    Nakamura, Katrina, Lori Bishop, Trevor Ward, Ganapathiraju Pramod, Dominic Chakra Thomson, Patima Tungpuchayakul, and Sompong Srakaew. 2018. “Seeing Slavery in Seafood Supply Chains.” Science Advances 4 (7): e1701833.  https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/sciadv.1701833

    Outhwaite, Opi, and Olga Martin-Ortega. 2019. “Worker-driven monitoring–Redefining supply chain monitoring to improve labour rights in global supply chains.” Competition & Change 23, no. 4 (2019): 378-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529419865690 

    Parhusip, Jonathan. 2023. “Emerging Port Infrastructure and Advocacy Networks for Migrant Fishers in Taiwan.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 32, no. 2 (June 2023): 371–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/01171968231191468.

    Song, Andrew M., Joeri Scholtens, Kate Barclay, Simon R. Bush, Michael Fabinyi, Dedi S. Adhuri, and Milton Haughton. 2020. “Collateral Damage? Small-Scale Fisheries in the Global Fight Against IUU Fishing.” Fish and Fisheries 21 (4): 831–843.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/faf.12462

    Sparks, Jessica L. Decker, Lee Matthews, Daniel Cárdenas, and Chris Williams. 2022. “Worker-less social responsibility: How the proliferation of voluntary labour governance tools in seafood marginalise the workers they claim to protect.” Marine Policy 139 : 105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105044 

    The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International, Global Fishing Watch, and Ocean Outcomes. 2025. Monitoring for Change: Insights from a Pilot on Electronic Monitoring and Wi-Fi Solutions for Social Responsibility. April 2025.

    Thomas, Leah. 2022. The Intersectional Environmentalist: How to Dismantle Systems of Oppression to Protect People + Planet. Voracious, Little, Brown and Company.

    UN. 2011. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/wg-business/access-remedy

    Wilhelm, Miriam, Vikram Bhakoo, Vivek Soundararajan, Andrew Crane, and Alin Kadfak. 2024. “Beyond Compliance-Based Governance: The Role of Social Intermediaries in Mitigating Forced Labour in Global Supply Chains.” Production and Operations Management 34, no. 5 (February 8, 2024): 1094–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478231224922.

    Zajak, Sabrina. 2017. “Channels for workers’ voice in the transnational governance of labour rights?.” Global Policy 8, no. 4 : 530-539.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1758-5899.12465#:~:text=https%3A//doi.org/10.1111/1758%2D5899.12465 


    ABOUT THE AUTHORS

    Carlye Goldman is a second-year graduate student studying International Affairs: Natural Resources and Sustainable Development at American University and the University for Peace in Costa Rica and recently obtained a graduate certificate in Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems from Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy. She previously worked for the Foundation for Food & Agriculture Research, and is passionate about addressing challenges related to nutrition, sustainable agriculture, and food sovereignty in vulnerable populations.


    Natalie Leonard is a second-year graduate student studying International Affairs: Natural Resources and Sustainable Development at American University and the University for Peace in Costa Rica. She is interested in the intersection of rights-based conservation and sustainable food systems, and she has contributed to research examining the relationship between forest cover change and coffee production in southern Costa Rica.


    Elizabeth Parker is a 2025 graduate with a degree in International Affairs: Natural Resources and Sustainable Development from American University and the University for Peace in Costa Rica. They are passionate about environmental justice and ecological wisdom in global sustainability and currently serves as the Travel Coordinator for Soles4Souls, an international nonprofit advancing circularity and poverty alleviation through sustainable solutions.

  • The Organization of American States Under a Second Trump Presidency

    Exterior of the Organization of American States “Main Building” in Washington, DC near the White House. (Image Source: Flickr; https://tinyurl.com/2t3swaxe)

    By Lucas Wood-Gluck

    The Organization of American States is an overlooked diplomatic, security, and economic forum that U.S. policymakers neglect to the benefit of adversaries, but at the cost of regional integration and U.S. credibility.


    From overt U.S. remarks of annexation to rumors of a possible regime change operation in Venezuela, the Western Hemisphere has received renewed geopolitical attention at a time when headlines are dominated by war in Africa and Eurasia. It is therefore imperative that U.S. policymakers do not overlook opportunities to promote peace and multilateralism elsewhere, including the Western Hemisphere. One overlooked intergovernmental organization is the Organization of American States (OAS), an entity in which the United States has a unique leadership position that the Trump administration should not squander if it wishes to genuinely pursue stability in Central and South America.

     The OAS was founded in 1948 as an economic and diplomatic forum for the Western Hemisphere and builds upon the regional collective security agreement known as the 1947 Rio Treaty.[i] The organization has five goals: “promoting democracy; defending human rights; ensuring a multidimensional approach to security; fostering integral development and prosperity; and supporting inter-American legal cooperation.”[ii] It is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and had an approved budget of $167 million in 2024, of which the United States provided $60.4 million.[iii] All independent countries in the Western Hemisphere are OAS member states except for three: Cuba due to suspension, Nicaragua due to voluntary withdrawal, and Venezuela due to conflicting representatives.[iv]

    Throughout its history, the OAS has provided the United States with a vital diplomatic avenue to safeguard its interests in the region. During the Cold War, the OAS approved the Caracas Declaration of 1954, calling on member states “to take the necessary measures to protect their political independence against the intervention of international communism.”[v] This gave the United States the diplomatic cover to flex its hegemony in the region through coups, embargoes, and invasions. Beginning in the 1990’s with the end of the Cold War, the OAS was able to shift efforts to cooperative regional stabilization such as investing in and providing disaster relief to member states through the Inter-American Development Bank.[vi] Additionally, the Mechanism for the Implementation of the Inter-American Convention against Corruption, or MESICIC, assists with strengthening election integrity and promoting good governance.[vii] Most recently in November 2024, in response to the collapse of the security situation in Haiti following the 2021 assassination of President Moïse, the OAS adopted Resolution 1268 to promote Haiti’s request for a U.N. peacekeeping operation.[viii]

    Despite the regional leverage provided by the OAS, the Trump administration’s nationalistic rhetoric, threats of annexation, and unilateral military strikes in the Caribbean against supposed drug traffickers not only undermine the United States’ traditional organizational standing, but also risk fueling the rise of similar organizations that exclude the United States.[ix] The OAS has reported that the Trump administration terminated funding for twenty-two OAS programs, and the preliminary U.S. FY 2026 budget proposal “recommends pausing most assessed contributions and all voluntary contributions to international organizations.”[x] Considering that the United States contributes almost a third of the OAS budget, this reduced funding and leadership will very likely produce worsened electoral oversight, weakened anti-corruption efforts, slower disaster relief, and a more volatile security environment in the region. Increased insecurity invariably displaces more people, who will likely continue to try entering the United States for better opportunity despite the Trump administration’s attempts to curtail immigration.[xi] Alternatively, a rumored U.S.-Venezuela war would almost certainly send shockwaves throughout the region; according to the OAS Charter, “Every State… has the duty to abstain from intervening in the affairs of another State.” This non-intervention clause has remained a hallmark in regional relations, and a U.S. invasion against a recent OAS member state as large as Venezuela would almost certainly alienate the United States and undermine OAS authority.[xii] By pursuing short-term, bellicose policies, President Trump is alienating U.S. neighbors and empowering alternative organizations that exclude Washington.

    A strong OAS rewards member states, promotes greater inter-American cooperation, and disincentivizes members from deepening ties with U.S. adversaries. However, the Trump administration’s reduced funding provides adversaries with the opportunity to drive a wedge between Washington and other OAS member states. For example, Argentina planned to formally enter BRICS in January 2024, a growing body of rising economies with varying degrees of anti-Western sentiment, but President Milei reversed course almost immediately after taking office in December 2023 in a move signaling immediate realignment with the U.S.-led international order.[xiii] Although many factors likely contributed to President Milei’s decision, the perks of regional economic and diplomatic integration, thanks in part to the OAS, appear to have been too vital to the national interest to risk. Since President Trump’s return to office and the ensuing shakeup of global alliances, however, OAS member states are more incentivized to pursue policies of self-interest. In October 2024, Argentina received a $20 billion bailout by the Trump administration and then immediately took advantage of the ongoing U.S.-China trade war to strike a deal with China to sell them a record-high number of soybeans, a market previously dominated by U.S. soybeans but now severely disrupted by President Trump’s tariffs.[xiv]

    Another growing organization is the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC). Founded in 2011, CELAC is a regional forum of countries in the Caribbean and Central and South America promoting regional integration, sustainable development, and political cooperation. Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua are members, while the United States and Canada are not.[xv] During its April 2025 summit, member states “critiqued [President Trump’s] tariffs and strategized about the future of the United Nations,” and the group has said it will hold meetings with the European Union, the Gulf Cooperation Council, the African Union, and China.[xvi] While CELAC indeed represents a logical step toward greater integration among Latin American states with a shared heritage, it would be unwise for U.S. policymakers not to take the OAS seriously in response to growing diplomatic competition. CELAC would only be a potential national security concern to the United States if it overtook the OAS as the premier diplomatic body of the Western Hemisphere, which would almost certainly be the fault of continued U.S. neglect and signal that there are worse problems to solve back home.

    Works Cited

    AP News. “US Calls Nicaragua’s Decision to Leave Organization of American States a ‘Step Away from Democracy,’” November 19, 2023. https://apnews.com/article/nicaragua-organization-of-american-states-ac9df8e440c5196e4b282e892dbb8f53.

    Cano, Regina Garcia. “Trump Has Accused Boat Crews of Being Narco-Terrorists. The Truth, AP Found, Is More Nuanced.” AP News, November 7, 2025. https://apnews.com/article/trump-venezuela-boat-strikes-drugs-cocaine-trafficking-95b54a3a5efec74f12f82396a79617ea.

    “Caracas Declaration of Solidarity,” March 28, 1954. https://loveman.sdsu.edu/docs/1954Caracas.pdf.

    CELAC International. “The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States,” n.d. https://celacinternational.org/.

    CFR Editors. “The Organization of American States.” Council on Foreign Relations, April 12, 2012. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/organization-american-states#chapter-title-0-11.

    Inter-American Development Bank. “History of the IDB.” IDB, n.d. https://www.iadb.org/en/who-we-are/about-us/history-idb.

    Meyer, Peter. “Organization of American States: In Brief.” Congress.gov, May 21, 2025. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47230.

    Madison Mills and Marc Caputo, “The U.S. Helped Argentina, Then Argentine Farmers Made a Deal with China,” Axios, September 24, 2025, https://www.axios.com/2025/09/24/trump-milei-us-argentina.

    Moore, Jack. “Trump Vows to ‘Permanently Pause’ Migration from Some Countries after National Guard Shooting.” ABC News, November 28, 2025. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-permanently-pause-migration-countries-after-national-guard/story?id=127942078.

    Organization of American States. “Anticorruption Portal of the Americas – MESICIC.” http://www.oas.org, August 1, 2009. https://www.oas.org/en/sla/dlc/mesicic/default.asp.

    ———. “Charter of the Organization of American States (A-41),” n.d. https://www.oas.org/en/sla/dil/inter_american_treaties_A-41_charter_OAS.asp.

    ———. “In Support of Haiti’s Request for a United Nations Peacekeeping Operation.” Un.org, November 13, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/S/2024/847.

    ———. “OAS – Organization of American States: Democracy for Peace, Security, and Development.” http://www.oas.org, August 1, 2009. https://www.oas.org/en/.

    ———. “OAS Revokes Resolution Suspending Membership of Cuba in the Inter-American System.” OAS, August 1, 2009. https://www.oas.org/en/media_center/press_release.asp?sCodigo=GA-12-09.

    Osborn, Catherine. “Latin American Leaders Gather in Honduras.” Foreign Policy, April 11, 2025. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/04/11/celac-summit-trump-tariffs-un-secretary-general/. Plummer, Robert. “Argentina Pulls out of Plans to Join BRICS Bloc.” Www.bbc.com, December 29, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-67842992


    [i] CFR Editors, “The Organization of American States,” Council on Foreign Relations, April 12, 2012, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/organization-american-states#chapter-title-0-11.

    [ii] Organization of American States, “OAS – Organization of American States: Democracy for Peace, Security, and Development,” http://www.oas.org, August 1, 2009, https://www.oas.org/en/.

    [iii] Peter Meyer, “Organization of American States: In Brief,” Congress.gov, May 21, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47230.

     

    [v] “Caracas Declaration of Solidarity,” March 28, 1954, https://loveman.sdsu.edu/docs/1954Caracas.pdf.

    [vi] Inter-American Development Bank, “History of the IDB,” IDB, https://www.iadb.org/en/who-we-are/about-us/history-idb.

    [vii] Organization of American States, “Anticorruption Portal of the Americas – MESICIC,” http://www.oas.org, August 1, 2009, https://www.oas.org/en/sla/dlc/mesicic/default.asp.

    [viii] Organization of American States, “In Support of Haiti’s Request for a United Nations Peacekeeping Operation,” Un.org, November 13, 2025, https://docs.un.org/en/S/2024/847.

    [ix] Regina Garcia Cano, “Trump Has Accused Boat Crews of Being Narco-Terrorists. The Truth, AP Found, Is More Nuanced,” AP News, November 7, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-venezuela-boat-strikes-drugs-cocaine-trafficking-95b54a3a5efec74f12f82396a79617ea.

    [x] Peter Meyer, “Organization of American States: In Brief”

    [xi] Jack Moore, “Trump Vows to ‘Permanently Pause’ Migration from Some Countries after National Guard Shooting,” ABC News, November 28, 2025, https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-permanently-pause-migration-countries-after-national-guard/story?id=127942078.

    [xii] Organization of American States, “Charter of the Organization of American States (A-41),” n.d., https://www.oas.org/en/sla/dil/inter_american_treaties_A-41_charter_OAS.asp.

    [xiii] Robert Plummer, “Argentina Pulls out of Plans to Join BRICS Bloc,” Www.bbc.com, December 29, 2023, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-67842992.

    [xiv] Madison Mills and Marc Caputo, “The U.S. Helped Argentina, Then Argentine Farmers Made a Deal with China,” Axios, September 24, 2025, https://www.axios.com/2025/09/24/trump-milei-us-argentina.

    [xv] “The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States,” CELAC International, https://celacinternational.org/.

    [xvi] Catherine Osborn, “Latin American Leaders Gather in Honduras,” Foreign Policy, April 11, 2025, https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/04/11/celac-summit-trump-tariffs-un-secretary-general/.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

    Lucas Wood-Gluck

    Lucas is a second-year master’s student in the U.S. Foreign Policy and National Security program at SIS and a 2025-2026 Boren Fellowship awardee (Latvia, Russian). He is from Miami, Florida, received his bachelor’s degree in international studies from the University of Florida, and speaks English, Spanish, Russian, and Brazilian Portuguese

  • The Militarization of Queer Sexuality: Is Sexuality an Assemblage of National Security Regimes?

    Image Source: Stanford University Digital Stacks; https://tinyurl.com/bdfx6f5j

    By Christopher Belden

    The mainstream conception of national security renders gender identity and sexual orientation as irrelevant; however, states imbed sexuality as part of their national security agendas creating a circular assemblage through the dichotomous informant-security threat identity mapped upon queer bodies.


    In the existing analyses of Cold War national security policy, scholars often fixate on nuclear proliferation and militarization, all while excluding the role of queer sexuality in national security regimes. The United States and the Soviet Union (including its “satellite nations”) incorporated queer sexuality in their national security policy during the Cold War. Both superpowers viewed queer persons as a threat to national security and as an asset for the state’s surveillance of queer spaces. Drawing upon critical security studies, this paper intends to demonstrate how and why queer sexuality became embedded in national security agendas and its relevance today. In doing so, this paper’s analysis is further situated in the theories of differentiation, biopolitics, and assemblage. This paper argues that queer sexuality is an assemblage in national security regimes which establishes biopower for the state. By tethering sexuality to national security, queer sexuality is militarized and constructs queer individuals as national security threats, all while simultaneously being seen as potential intelligence assets. This paper uses the United States and East Germany during the Cold War as case studies to demonstrate that sexuality as an assemblage to national security was not unique to one political ideology but utilized by governments across the spectrum. This paper concludes that sexuality as an assemblage did not end with the Cold War but continues to this day as demonstrated with Israeli pinkwashing.

    Sexuality and the State: Differentiation, Biopower and the Theory of Assemblage  

    Traditional theories in security studies overemphasize the physicality and militarization of security. These theories equate national security to the protection of a state’s sovereignty, territory, and identity from the foreigner.[1] However, in alignment with critical security studies, this paper views security as a “derivative concept,” meaning that one’s sense of security is uniquely influenced by one’s own understanding of the world and the institutions that govern their lives.[2] More succinctly, critical security studies view the concept of security as context-dependent based on one’s positionality. Therefore, a threat perceived by one citizen from a state may not be perceived as a threat from another person of that same state due to the different perspectives and experiences they see the world through.[3] With this in mind, this paper adopts a critical security studies framework because, through its applied analysis of Sander Gilman’s theory of differentiation and Michel Foucault’s theory of biopower, it demonstrates that the perceived national security threat is socially constructed through the underlying factor of stigmatization. Furthermore, as demonstrated with Manuel DeLanda’s theory of assemblage, this threat can be decoded and recoded to no longer be a threat but an intelligence asset.[4] Therefore, the threat-asset identity is dependent on its operational use within a national security apparatus. To further clarify the critical security studies framework, Gilman, Foucault, and DeLanda’s theories further provide an in-depth analysis regarding how a threat, such as queer sexuality, acts as a derivative concept.

    Gilman, in Difference and Pathology: Stereotypes of Sexuality, Race, and Madness, theorizes that the state’s regulation of queer sexuality intentionally renders it as “Other” to project and displace its anxieties and insecurities upon the LGBTQ+ community. In doing so, the state aims to preserve its artificial national identity and the imaginary from which its perceived legitimacy is derived. Queer sexuality then becomes a threat to the state since, “deviation, either in the nature of the sexual act or in its perceived purpose, becomes ‘disease,’ or its theological equivalent, ‘sin’.” Thus, “sexual norms become modes of control.”[5] Within social order, queer sexuality is stigmatized as “deviant”, which initiates the construction of queer sexuality as a national security threat. Queer persons are then portrayed as lacking morality and loyalty since they are not grounded to the state through the nuclear family.[6] Therefore, queer sexuality becomes a national security threat by challenging the heteronormative institutions that compose a state’s identity.

    With the construction of queer persons as the ‘Other’, the state utilized sexual norms and regulation as a mechanism of biopower[7] to mitigate the threat of queer sexuality. Foucault, in The History of Sexuality, discusses how the act of sex was constructed as desirable in which individuals express their pleasure; however, governments began regulating the expression of one’s sexuality to establish biopower as another layer of control over the populace.[8] As a result, one’s body and sexuality are put under the purview of the government, which enacts “continuous regulatory and corrective measures” through norms to classify their subjects “in the domain of value and utility” to the state.[9] Through the distribution of value and utility, the state rewards those who further their agenda and ‘Others’ those who do not conform to it. In other words, Foucault argues that sexuality is one of the components in power relations “endowed with the greatest instrumentality.”[10] Sexuality as a tool then becomes “useful for the greatest number of maneuvers and [is] capable of serving as a point of support, as a linchpin, for the most varied strategies.”[11] Therefore, as this paper demonstrates, states embed sexuality and biopower into their national security apparatus not only to portray it as a threat, but to exploit it as a mechanism to further their national security agenda.

    Through the incorporation of sexuality in a state’s national security regime, the perceived threat of queer sexuality is reinforced by the state’s recruitment of queer individuals, ultimately creating a circular state assemblage. Manuel DeLanda defined an assemblage as “a multiplicity which is made up of many heterogeneous terms and which establishes liaisons [and] relations between them.”[12] He notes that an “assemblage’s only unity is that of a co-functioning” or, in simpler terms, the assemblage exists as a result of the interaction between the components.[13] More concretely, within the theory of assemblage, there are three components at play: the condition of the assemblage, its concrete elements, and the personae.[14] The condition of the assemblage is the system in which the relationality between the concrete elements interacts.[15] The concrete elements are “the existing embodiment of the assemblage” and the core actors involved in the system which interact with one another.[16] The personae is the linking mechanism between the concrete elements within the system of assemblage.[17]

    For the duration of this paper, the condition of the assemblage is a state’s system of national security in which one’s sexuality, visibility in society, the state’s agenda and self-proscribed identity are the concrete elements that interact. The personae linking these elements together and putting them in relation to one another includes the role of intelligence or law enforcement agencies and the role of legislation or Executive Orders constructing a state’s identity. Since the personae are not fixed and can be recoded to satisfy the operational need of the state’s will, a circular state assemblage emerges. As this paper will demonstrate, a state first declares queer sexuality as a national security threat through the implementation of social regulation. For effective enforcement and surveillance, the state then needs to recruit informants from the LGBTQ+ community and recode queer persons as intelligence assets. However, in doing so, the queer informants expose the prevalence of queer sexuality, which stokes the state’s fear and ultimately perpetuates the cycle of queer sexuality as a perceived national security threat.  Therefore, according to the theory of assemblage, queer individuals simultaneously absorb the dichotomous functionality of an informant and a security threat.

    Scholars of queer surveillance typically view sexuality and national security through a Foucauldian theoretical framework, utilizing Foucault’s theory of biopower, to explain sexuality’s role in national security. However, more recent scholarship has loosened Foucault’s influence. Scholars, such as Samuel Clowes Huneke, have persuasively argued that the Foucauldian framework only explains the regulatory narrative and fails to bring to the forefront the various other ways the state uses sexuality— particularly for intelligence purposes through informant recruitment. Huneke, in “The Surveillance of Subcultures: Gay Spies, Everyday Life, and Cold War Intelligence in Divided Berlin,” argued that “surveillance could play a permissive, rather than a disciplinary, role in queer lives.”[18] Huneke also highlighted “how the paranoias of the security state could reinforce themselves through the surveillance of subcultures.”[19] This paper expands off of Huneke’s scholarship by explicitly situating its analysis in assemblage theory in tandem with Foucault’s theory of biopower to provide a holistic analysis of the role of queer sexuality in national security.

    Pawns of the Communists: The Lavender Scare and U.S. National Security

    Following the Second World War, the United States entered a Second Red Scare resulting in the conflation of communism and queer sexuality. This conflation ultimately embedded sexuality as an assemblage into the United States’ Cold War national security regime. On February 9th, 1950, Senator McCarthy gave a scathing speech in Wheeling, West Virginia claiming to have a list of 205 communists in the State Department. On that list, Case 14 and Case 62 were queer individuals.[20] McCarthy ultimately failed to provide any substantial evidence of communist infiltration, which led Congress to pivot their focus from communist infiltrators to queer employees in the civil service: as witnessed with the Wherry-Hill and Hoey Committee investigations.[21]

    The historical pathologization of queer individuals during the first half of the twentieth century made them an easy scapegoat for the paranoia of the Cold War and transformed queer sexuality from a social crime into a national security threat.[22] With this in mind, political figures like Guy Gabrielson, the National Chairman of the Republican Party, proclaimed, “Homosexuals were at least ‘as dangerous as the actual communists.’”[23] Gabrielson coded queer sexuality as “un-American,” constructing it as a “psychological maladjustment that led some people toward communism.”[24]Through his conflation of queer sexuality with communism, Gabrielson invoked biopower as a mechanism of control over queer bodies to depict them as a threat to U.S. national security. Therefore, one’s nonconformity to the heteronormative national imaginary made them an enemy to the state.

    Homosexuals were further militarized through the conflation of homosexuality and communism in the Wherry-Hill and Hoey Committee investigations. From March 1950 to May of that year, Senator Kenneth Wherry and Senator J. Lister Hill opened an investigation to ensure that the 91 queer individuals purged from the State Department in 1947 were not reemployed by another government entity.[25] Senator Wherry described the urgency of purging queer employees, arguing: 

    Wherever they [homosexuals] may be employed in a department handling defense secrets…moral perverts are a security risk, because of their proximity to persons having security secrets and documents containing such information…[the] blackmailing of [a] moral pervert [sic] is a long-established weapon among nations plotting aggression.[26]

    Senator Wherry believed queer individuals were disqualified from federal employment because they were a liability of the state, since enemies of the United States could potentially coerce them into becoming espionage agents. Senator Wherry particularly identified the Soviet Union as instigating espionage recruitment, stating, “Only the most naïve could believe that the Communists’ fifth column in the United States would neglect to propagate and use homosexuals to gain their treacherous ends.”[27] The Wherry-Hill investigation’s designation of queer individuals as “security risks” began the militarization of queer identity during the Cold War and was further perpetuated during the Hoey Committee investigation.[28]

     With the publication of the Hoey Committee report, Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government, the espionage narrative exponentially grew in magnitude. From January 1, 1947, to October 31, 1950, approximately 4,380 military personnel and 420 civil service employees were purged from their positions for “sex perversion.”[29] The report insinuated that the suspicion of one queer individual was one too many, arguing that “one homosexual can pollute a government office.”[30] The government fervently believed the Soviet Union had “a program seeking out [the] weaknesses of leaders in [the United States] government and industry,” and that the FBI had “information of unquestionable reliability that orders have been issued by high Russian intelligence officials …to secure details of the private lives of government officials.”[31] The depiction of queer sexuality as a state-run covert campaign to penetrate the United States’ national security solidified the perception of queer individuals as unloyal traitors willing to sabotage the United States. As a result, sexuality was made an integral element in the United States’ national security policy. However, both committees failed to acknowledge that the perceived threat originated in their own stigmatization of queer sexuality and its institutionalization.

    Propagating the militarization of queer identity as a communist agent, the Eisenhower administration issued Executive Order 10450 as a line of defense on April 27, 1953. Under Section 8, the Executive Order institutionalized queer sexuality as a national security threat. Executive Order 10450 went on to equate queer sexuality to “criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral [and] notoriously disgraceful conduct.”[32] As a result, queer individuals over the next two decades were banned from government service due to their perceived “threat.”[33] The integration of sexuality as a litmus test for the United States government reflects the Eisenhower administration’s incorporation of biopower into its national security framework. The depiction of queer individuals as conspiring with the enemy exhibits the linkage of sexuality as an assemblage in the United States’ national security apparatus. The government perceived queer persons residing in the United States as pawns of the Soviets, who used them to transform individuals’ sexuality and queer spaces into a metaphysical battleground for another proxy war. In order to understand how sexuality acts as a circular assemblage, the remainder of this section will shift its focus to analyze how queer individuals played an active role in perpetuating the surveillance regime.

     The United States government embedded sexuality into its national security agenda because it productively coerced queer individuals into becoming informants for the state. As historian Douglas M. Charles notes in his book, The FBI’s Obscene File: J. Edgar Hoover and the Bureau’s Crusade Against Smut, the FBI transitioned their focus from criminal investigations to national security threats in 1936.[34] Their systemic surveillance of queer subcultures coincidentally began one year later and metastasized into the “Sex Deviates” program in 1951.[35] The goal of the program was to “disseminate information about gay federal employees to ensure their termination.”[36] The FBI successfully recruited Homophile activists to become informants as part of the “Sex Deviates” program, as witnessed with the case of David Finn.

    The cooperation between Homophile activists and the FBI ultimately shows how queer sexuality acted as an assemblage since it was viewed not only as a threat but also as an asset. In a March 1954 ONE magazine article, “Who Is This Man?,” Finn was exposed as an informant, reporting, “one delegate rose to assert that he had been closely associated with the F.B.I. for many years,” and that in his quest to relinquish any suspected communist sympathizers from Mattachine leadership he threatened to “report the activities of the [Mattachine] Convention to the police.”[37] Furthermore, an FBI Special Agent memo from June 1953 reported Finn expressed “he would be glad to cooperate with the FBI in the future.”[38] In other words, queer individuals were key assets necessary for the state to surveil the queer national security threat. Through a critical security lens, the United States government constructed queer sexuality as a national security threat through the institutionalization of its stigma by way of Executive Order 10450. To protect the United States’ heteronormative identity at a time of growing global uncertainty, the government emboldened itself through the deployment of biopower. In doing so, sexuality was embedded as an assemblage in U.S. national security.

    Western Spies: Queer Individuals in the German Democratic Republic and the Stasi 

    East Germany and the Soviet Union, like the United States, also embedded queer sexuality as a circular state assemblage through the dichotomous threat-asset identity. In a similar manner, East Germany’s secret police and intelligence agency, the Stasi, controlled the queer threat through surveillance of queer spaces, the persecution of political opponents, and the purge of their own ranks of suspected queer individuals. In 1951, nearly thirty-two bars in the Scheunenviertel neighborhood of Berlin were forced to close due to being stigmatized as “pederast and gay broad bars” depicted as “sketchy.”[39] One of these bars was the famous Mulackritze, which was known to be frequented by some of the most well-known queer public figures.[40] The Stasi targeted queer bars like Mulackritze because they were perceived as spaces where Western agents could corrupt and recruit East Germans as spies.[41] As historian Andrea Rottman explains, queer individuals were “long considered unreliable citizens because of their transnational networks,” which connected them “to the other side of the Iron Curtain.”[42] Therefore, by viewing queer spaces as vulnerable for Western infiltration, the Stasi exercised biopower to control the public deployment of its residents’ sexuality. 

    The role of sexuality in the Eastern Bloc’s national security became even more evident with the Stasi and Soviet Union’s suppression of the 1953 uprising in East Germany. The 1953 uprising was a rebuke of both Sovietization and the incorporation of East Germany as a Soviet satellite state.[43] Historian Samuel Clowes Huneke attributes the uprising as a significant moment when sexuality became embedded in the Eastern Bloc’s security strategy. He claims it “mark[ed] a shift in language around homosexuality” and made “clear that homosexuality would have no public place under socialism.”[44] To convey this message, the Stasi persecuted East Germany’s Minister of Justice, Max Fechner, because he opposed the Soviet Union and the Stasi’s illegal arrests made during the uprising. This led to Fechner’s imprisonment for eight years under Paragraph 175, the notorious anti-homosexual penal code.[45] The Stasi politicized and scapegoated Fechner’s sexuality to continue the narrative that queer individuals could not be loyal comrades. Therefore, queer sexuality was juxtaposed to Sovietization and seen as contradictory to the state’s agenda.

     Viewing queerness as a threat to national security, Cold War anxieties forced the Stasi to look inward and purge their own ranks. In 1955, Ernst Wollweber, the Stasi Minister, ordered the purge of queer officers and echoed the rhetoric of the Hoey Committee report. He argued that “colleagues who are not unwavering in a moral sense” were unfit for service.[46] From the Stasi perspective, East Germany had to enact queer persecution as a defense mechanism to “localize [their] anxiety” and “prove to [themselves] that what [they] fear does not lie within.”[47] As a result, queer East Germans became militarized through the Stasi’s projection of their sexuality as an act of “Western decadence,” completing the construction of queer sexuality as a threat to the Eastern Bloc’s security.[48]

     All while constructing queer individuals as spies for the West, East Germany strategically utilized queer individuals as informants in their own national security regime. In October 1960, the Stasi recruited a gay actor in East Berlin, whose pseudonym was Franz Moor, solely because the Stasi believed, “his large circle of acquaintances, in particular among homosexuals and other negative persons,” put him “in a position to give [the Stasi] further leads” and could “lead to further recruitment.”[49] Through Moor’s surveillance work in Berlin’s gay subculture, the Stasi fervently came to believe that the West was “recruiting among homosexuals circles.”[50] During his investigation into the Nibelungen Ring, he reported that two women “maintain a circle of young men” and “turn these men into spies” whom they then “set up with homosexual persons” to “pump those individuals for information and learn their political views.”[51] Lesbians also were active informants for the Stasi and reported on the activities of other lesbians. An example of this is the work of Maria Jahn, who reported on the Friedrichstraße area, particularly the Mooka-Bar and G-Bier-Bar. Jahn flagged these bars for the Stasi as the “meeting spot for lesbian women.”[52] Through surveillance conducted by queer informants, queer sexuality became synonymous with acts of  Western aggression— or as Huneke states, an “avenue of infiltration.”[53]

    As demonstrated above, queer sexuality in East Germany was also a circular state assemblage. Queer sexuality was simultaneously coded as Western infiltration and as a mechanism to acquire national security intelligence. Assemblage theory enhances our understanding of the role of sexuality in national security regimes because it shows how dichotomous stigmatizations of deployments of sexuality interact and create a cycle of othering, recruiting, and surveilling queer individuals. Through the analyses of both the United States (a democracy) and East Germany (an authoritarian dictatorship), it is evident that sexuality’s functioning as an assemblage to national security is not unique to one governing ideology: rather, it is used by governments across the ideological spectrum. This functioning still holds true to this day.

    Is Sexuality Still Relevant Today in National Security?

     Sexuality as an assemblage of national security did not end at the close of the Cold War; rather, sexuality continues to function as an assemblage to this day— most notably within the Israel-Palestine conflict. On November 13, 2023, the Israeli government posted a photo of Yoav Atzmoni, an IDF soldier, proudly posing with a pride flag in front of smoldering Palestinian apartment buildings and claimed it was “the first ever pride flag raised in Gaza.”[54] Atzmoni’s photo is a classic example of Israeli pinkwashing and ultimately demonstrates Israel’s incorporation of sexuality as an assemblage into their national security regime.

    Israeli pinkwashing draws upon orientalist tropes and directly embeds sexuality into Israel’s national security apparatus as a mechanism to portray Israel in a favorable light in the eyes of Western governments. The very essence of pinkwashing depicts Palestine and other Muslim-majority nations as “barbaric” and oppressors of the LQBTQ+ community, all while portraying Israel as “one of the most LGBTQ+ friendly places in the world.”[55] For instance, Emily Francis, a Jewish World Weekly news anchor, stated in a recent segment with participants from Taglit’s LGBTQ Birthright trip, “Israel is so progressive and so accepting…and you know this would not be the case if you’re in Gaza. They’re not exactly, you know, welcoming LGBTQ [persons] with open arms.”[56] Whether LGBTQ+ Israelis know it or not, their sexuality is being exploited by Israel as part of a public relations campaign to solely further Israel’s national security strategy. Israel’s interest in the LGBTQ+ community is not in good faith. It is a facade used to further Israel’s occupation of Palestine all while garnering Western support for it.

    To be clear, this article does not excuse the trans/homophobia committed by some Palestinians.[57] Rather, it demonstrates that Israel intentionally exploits and instigates said trans/homophobia in Palestine for its own national security interests all while exacerbating the vulnerabilities queer Palestinians endure. As a result, Israel imposes a hyperbolized orientalist narrative upon Palestine, portraying it as uniquely trans/homophobic all while excusing their own role and responsibility for the violence committed against queer Palestinians. Therefore, Israel uses their pinkwashing campaign as a disguise for the human rights violations they commit during their ongoing occupation of Palestine.

    Throughout Israel’s occupation of Palestine, Israel has depicted queer Palestinians as national security threats and intelligence assets. Anthropologist Sa’ed Atshan, in his book Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, noted that Israel’s incorporation of queer Palestinians into their national security framework is nothing new. Rather, for decades, Israeli intelligence agencies “targeted queer Palestinians and used homophobia as a weapon, threatening to reveal them to their families and communities if they do not serve as informants or collaborators.”[58] An example of these tactics includes the experience of twenty-year-old Adham, who was messaged by an Israeli intelligence officer on Grindr.[59] The officer blackmailed Adham by sending him photos of his family to pressure him into participating in Israel’s investigation of his cousins.[60] They demanded Adham to go to his cousins’ home to “question [his cousins’] parents and get as much information about [his cousins] as possible.”[61] Confirming the use of these tactics, a former IDF official, who served in Unit 8200, relayed that Israeli intelligence officers are “instructed to watch for Arabic words like ‘gay’ and ‘affair’ when monitoring communications of potential targets.”[62] Israel’s surveillance and exploitation of Palestine’s queer community is a clear display of biopower. Israel is exploiting the stigmatization attached to queer identity as a point of infiltration into Palestinian life. Therefore, Israel’s exploitation of queer Palestinians is embedded as an assemblage to the state’s national security apparatus to further its occupation of Palestine.

    Israel not only exploits the stigmatization of queer sexuality to its benefit, but also reenforces said stigmatization through its securitization. In doing so, Israel embedded sexuality as an assemblage to Israel’s national security apparatus. The recruitment of queer individuals is well known in Palestinian society to the extent that Palestinians conflate homosexuality with espionage.[63] Therefore, queer Palestinians are rejected from Palestinian society on the basis of being national security threats and conflated with Israel’s occupation, and more recently, genocide[64]. As Atshan explains, Israel instigates Palestinian homophobia so that “the Israeli government [can] invoke Palestinian homophobia to further pinkwashing propaganda.”[65]  Therefore, the homophobia that fuels Israel’s blackmailing machine is deliberately incited to advance its national security agenda.

    The circular state assemblage continues to be developed through Israel’s flat-out denial of queer Palestinians’ human rights and right to asylum. While Israel portrays Palestine as violently homophobic, it ignores the state’s own perpetuation of homophobic violence against the LGBTQ+ community and queer Palestinians. Perceiving queerness as a threat to the state, Israeli politician Nissim Ze’ev proclaimed that homosexuals are “as toxic as bird flu” and that they are “carrying out the self-destruction of Israeli society.”[66] Ze’ev’s remarks construct queer identity as a threat to Israeli national security by portraying it as a disease infecting Israeli identity. Further institutionalizing the securitization from queer sexuality, Prime Minister Netanyahu recently partnered with extremist anti-LGBTQ+ politicians to regain power in December 2022, including self-proclaimed “fascist homophobe” Bezalel Smotrich (Israel’s Finance Minister).[67] Israeli officials perceive queer sexuality as a threat because they believe it enforces the antisemitic effeminate depiction of Jews and tarnishes their image as a Jewish state on the global stage.[68] Therefore, while Israel’s pinkwashing agenda was deployed to garner support and legitimacy by appeasing Western government’s performative “interest” in human rights, Israel’s heteronormative state identity continues to pathologize queer sexuality and portrays it as a threat. 

      The generalized homophobia possessed by top Israeli leaders is exponentially magnified for queer Palestinians due to their intersecting identities of being both queer and Palestinian. In justifying the denial of asylum to queer Palestinians, Eli Yishai (Israel’s former Minister on Internal Affairs) insinuated that, “according to international law, being gay is not a reason for granting asylum.”[69] Furthermore, Israel’s Population and Immigration Authority has historically denied asylum claims filed by LGBTQ+ Palestinians on the sole basis that they are Palestinian and hence “are not subject to the UN’s Refugee Convention.”[70] The Tel Aviv Court for Administrative Affairs, however, in February 2024 ruled that LGBTQ+ Palestinians can in fact request asylum in Israel.[71] Former Israeli Minister of Interior, Moshe Arbel, voiced opposition to the ruling and announced his intention to appeal the decision.[72] Therefore, demonstrating that Israel’s concern for LGBTQ+ Palestinians ends at their utility for Israel’s national security agenda. The narrative of Israel’s pinkwashing propaganda depicting Palestinians as violently homophobic is conveniently forgotten by the Ministry of Interior.

    Queer Palestinians become securitized as threats when they are attempting to apply for asylum in Israel due to the trans/homophobia they endure in Palestine which is exacerbated and instigated by Israel’s imperial project. Atshan reflects on this dichotomy, explaining Israel “recognizes Palestinians as victims only when the perpetrators are also Palestinian and when doing so is convenient for Israeli state narratives.”[73] These narratives intentionally incorporate queer sexuality into the state’s national security framework as a self-reinforcing apparatus designed to advance its occupation of Palestine and, more recently, the genocide[74] of the Palestinian people. Through their pinkwashing agenda, the blackmailing of queer Palestinians, and the denial of queer Palestinian asylum claims, Israel invokes biopower to code queer Palestinians as both a threat and an asset for Israeli national security. This case demonstrates that sexuality still acts as an assemblage in national security regimes today.

    Conclusion

    Queer sexuality as an assemblage to national security functions almost identically in the United States, East Germany, and the Israel-Palestine case studies. In each case study, a circular state assemblage materialized where the stigmatization of queer sexuality created a perceived national security threat, which then resulted in the state invoking biopower to surveil and control queer individuals. They incorporated queer individuals into national security regimes as both assets and threats, creating a self-perpetuating cycle in which each role reinforced the other. This analysis is crucial to understanding national security regimes. While the relationship between national security and race, ethnicity, and religion have been well documented, its relationship with sexuality has largely been overlooked and rendered insignificant. This paper concludes that sexuality has been and continues to be an assemblage in national security regimes. Sexuality will continue to be an assemblage to national security until the state: 1) relinquishes its control over human sexuality, 2) terminates its perpetuation of the stigmatization of queer individuals, and 3) decentralizes the role of heteronormativity in state identity. Until this is accomplished, the circular state assemblage will continue to infringe and exploit the human rights of the LGBTQ+ community on an international level.


    [1] Ken Booth, Critical Security Studies and World Politics (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005), 23. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685857356.

    [2] Booth, Critical Security Studies, 4 & 11.

    [3] Booth, Critical Security Studies, 13.

    [4] Thomas Nail, “What is an Assemblage?” SubStance 46, no. 1 (2017): 21-37, 37. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2017.0001.

    [5] Sander Gilman, Difference and Pathology: Stereotypes of Sexuality, Race, and Madness (Cornell University Press, 1985), 24.

    [6] Gilman, Difference and Pathology, 23.

    [7] According to Foucault, biopower is the disciplinary regulation of an individual’s life and death (and in this paper sexuality) as a mechanism of governance to control the populace and to sustain the longevity of the state.

    [8] Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality: Volume 1: An Introduction, translated by Robert Hurley (Vintage Books, 1990), 157.

    [9] Foucault, The History of Sexuality, 144.

    [10] Foucault, The History of Sexuality, 103.

    [11] Ibid.

    [12] Manuel Delanda, Assemblage Theory (Edinburgh University Press, 2016), 1. 

    [13] Delanda, Assemblage Theory, 1. 

    [14] Nail, “What is an Assemblage?,” 24.

    [15] Nail, “What is an Assemblage?,” 24.

    [16] Nail, “What is an Assemblage?,” 26.

    [17] Nail, “What is an Assemblage?,” 27.

    [18] Samuel Clowes Huneke, “The Surveillance of Subcultures: Gay Spies, Everyday Life, and Cold War Intelligence in Divided Berlin,” Journal of Social History 56, no. 3 (2023): 559-582, 559. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shac030.

    [19] Huneke, “The Surveillance of Subcultures,” 559.

    [20] Joseph McCarthy, “Wheeling Speech,” (February 9, 1950).

    [21] Judith Adkins, “These People Are Frightened to Death,” National Archives 48, no. 2 (2016). https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2016/summer/lavender.html.

    [22] Allan Bérubé, Coming Out Under Fire: The History of gay Men and Women in World War II (The University of North Carolina Press, 1990) 258-259; and Douglas M. Charles, Hoover’s War on Gays: Exposing the FBI’s “Sex Deviates” Program (University Press of Kansas, 2015), 36.

    [23] Charles, Hoover’s War on Gays, 83.

    [24] Johnson, “America’s Cold War Empire,” 56.

    [25] Adkins, “These People Are Frightened to Death.”

    [26] Senator Kenneth Wherry as quoted in Charles, Hoover’s War on Gays, 86.

    [27] Senator Kenneth Wherry as quoted in Adkins, “These People Are Frightened to Death.”

    [28] Adkins, “These People Are Frightened to Death.”

    [29] U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments Subcommittee on Investigations, Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government (81st Cong., 2nd sess., 1950), 24-25. https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:fd720pb8753/employment-homosexuals-serialset.pdf.

    [30] U.S. Congress, Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government, 4.

    [31] U.S. Congress, Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government, 6.

    [32] Executive Order no. 10450, Security Requirements for Government Employment, sec. 8 (April 27, 1953). https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/10450.html.

    [33] Adkins, “These People Are Frightened to Death.”

    [34] Douglas M. Charles, The FBI’s Obscene File: J. Edgar Hoover and the Bureau’s Crusade against Smut (University Press of Kansas, 2012), 3.

    [35] Charles, The FBI’s Obscene File, 3.

    [36] Charles, The FBI’s Obscene File, 43 and 60.

    [37] David Freeman, “Who Is This Man?” One: The Homosexual Magazine (March 1954); and Charles, Hoover’s War on Gays, 161.

    [38] Charles, Hoover’s War on Gays, 164.

    [39] Andrea Rottmann, Queer Lives Across the Wall: Desire and Danger in Divided Berlin, 1945-1970 (University of Toronto Press, 2023), 75 and 76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/jj.2960283.

    [40] Rottmann, Queer Lives Across the Wall, 75.

    [41] Huneke, States of Liberation, 74 and 76.

    [42] Rottmann, Queer Lives Across the Wall, 76.

    [43] Bryne, Malcolm and Gregory F. Domber, “Uprising in East Germany, 1953,” The National Security Archive at George Washington University (June 15, 2001). https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB50/.

    [44] Samuel Clowes Huneke, States of Liberation: Gay Men between Dictatorship and Democracy in Cold War Germany (University of Toronto Press, 2022), 73.

    [45] John O. Koehler, Stasi: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police, (Westview Press, 1999), 60; and Huneke, States of Liberation, 73.

    [46] Huneke, States of Liberation, 78.

    [47] Gilman, Difference and Pathology, 240. 

    [48] Huneke, States of Liberation, 74.

    [49] Huneke, States of Liberation, 108.

    [50] Huneke, States of Liberation, 109.

    [51] Huneke, States of Liberation,110; and Rottmann, Queer Lives Across the Wall, 95.

    [52] Rottmann, Queer Lives Across the Wall, 96.

    [53] Huneke, States of Liberation, 111.

    [54] Lubna Masarwa, “Israel-Palestine War: Soldier flying rainbow flag in Gaza ‘textbook pinkwashing,’” Middle East Eye (November 13, 2023). https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-war-soldier-rainbow-flag-gaza-condemned-pinkwashing-textbook.

    [55] Sa’ed Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique (Stanford University Press, 2020), 3; and Creative Community for Peace (@ccfpeace), “Tel Aviv is the ‘Gay Capital of the Middle East,’ and one of the most LGBTQ+ friendly places in the world,” Instagram, August 25, 2024. https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_GeKR4Nc7k/.

    [56] Jewish World Weekly (@i24NEWS English), “It feels like coming home” 150 LGBTQ+ people visit Israel on cultural exchange,” Video, 8:18, September 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PuQfKVgNyA.

    [57] Diaa Hadid and Majdal Waheidi, “Hamas commander accused of gay sex is killed by his own,” The Irish Times, March 1, 2016. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/middle-east/hamas-commander-accused-of-gay-sex-is-killed-by-his-own-1.2555822.; “Gay Palestinian Ahmad Abu Marhia beheaded in West Bank,” BBC News, October 7, 2022. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63174835.; “Palestine,” Human Dignity Trust, December 17, 2024. https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/palestine/.; and “LGBT Rights in Palestine,” Equaldex. https://www.equaldex.com/region/palestine.

    [58] Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, 2.

    [59] Theia Chatelle, “Palestinian Queers under Israeli surveillance— and threat,” Jewish Voice for Liberation (August 31, 2024). https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/palestinian-queers-under-israeli-surveillance-and-threat/.

    [60] Ibid.

    [61] Ibid.

    [62] Ibid.

    [63] Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, 5.

    [64] “Statement on Why We Call the Israeli Attack on Gaza Genocide,” Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security (December 29, 2023). https://www.lemkininstitute.com/statements-new-page/statement-on-why-we-call-the-israeli-attack-on-gaza-genocide; and “Israel has committed genocide on the Gaza strip, UN Commission finds,” United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (September 16, 2025). https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds.

    [65] Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, 102.

    [66] Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, 84.

    [67] Ron Kampeas, “Could the new government endanger Israel’s status as an LGBTQ haven?” The Times of Israel (January 18, 2023). https://www.timesofisrael.com/could-the-new-government-endanger-israels-status-as-an-lgbtq-haven/.

    [68] Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, 9.

    [69] Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, 166.

    [70] “LGBTQ+ Palestinians can request asylum in Israel, court rules,” The Jerusalem Post, February 5, 2024. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-785171.

    [71] Ibid.

    [72] Ibid.

    [73] Atshan, Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, 102.

    [74] Statement on Why We Call the Israeli Attack on Gaza Genocide,” Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention; and “Israel has committed genocide on the Gaza strip, UN Commission finds,” United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner.

    Works Cited (Primary Sources)

    Chatelle, Theia. “Palestinian Queers under Israeli surveillance— and threat.” Jewish Voice for Liberation. August 31, 2024. https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/palestinian-queers-under-israeli-surveillance-and-threat/.

    Creative Community for Peace (@ccfpeace). “Tel Aviv is the ‘Gay Capital of the Middle East,’ and one of the most LGBTQ+ friendly places in the world.” Instagram. August 25, 2024. https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_GeKR4Nc7k/.

    Executive Order no. 10450. Security Requirements for Government Employment, sec. 8 (April 27, 1953). https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/10450.html.

    Freeman, David. “Who Is This Man?” One: The Homosexual Magazine, March 1, 1954: 16-18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/community.28041906.

    Jewish World Weekly (@i24NEWS English). “It feels like coming home” 150 LGBTQ+ people visit Israel on cultural exchange.” Video, 8:18. September 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PuQfKVgNyA.

    Masarwa, Lubna. “Israel-Palestine War: Soldier flying rainbow flag in Gaza ‘textbook pinkwashing.’” Middle East Eye (November 13, 2023). https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-war-soldier-rainbow-flag-gaza-condemned-pinkwashing-textbook.

    McCarthy, Joseph. “Wheeling Speech.” February 9, 1950. https://pages.uoregon.edu/eherman/teaching/texts/McCarthy_Wheeling_Speech.pdf.

    U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments Subcommittee on Investigations. Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government. 81st Cong., 2nd sess., 1950. https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:fd720pb8753/employment-homosexuals-serialset.pdf.

    Works Cited (Secondary Sources)

    Adkins, Judith. “These People Are Frightened to Death: Congressional Investigations and the Lavender Scare.” National Archives 48, no.2 (Summer 2016). https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2016/summer/lavender.html.

    Atshan, Sa’ed. Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique. Stanford University Press, 2020.

    Bérubé, Allan. Coming Out Under Fire: The History of gay Men and Women in World War II. The University of North Carolina Press, 1990. 

    Booth, Ken. Critical Security Studies and World Politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685857356.

    Charles, Douglas M. The FBI’s Obscene File: J. Edgar Hoover and the Bureau’s Crusade against Smut. University Press of Kansas, 2012.

    Charles, Douglas M. Hoover’s War on Gays: Exposing the FBI’s “Sex Deviates” Program. University Press of Kansas,  2015.

    Delanda, Manuel. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

    Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. Vintage Books, 1990.

    “Gay Palestinian Ahmad Abu Marhia beheaded in West Bank.” BBC News. October 7, 2022. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63174835.

    Gilman, Sander L. Difference and Pathology: Stereotypes of Sexuality, Race, and Madness. Cornell University Press, 1985. 

    Hadid, Diaa and Majdal Waheidi. “Hamas commander accused of gay sex is killed by his own.” The Irish Times. March 1, 2016. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/middle-east/hamas-commander-accused-of-gay-sex-is-killed-by-his-own-1.2555822

    Huneke, Samuel Clowes. States of Liberation: Gay Men between Dictatorship and Democracy in Cold War Germany. University of Toronto Press, 2022.

    Huneke, Samuel Clowes. “The Surveillance of Subcultures: Gay Spies, Everyday Life, and Cold War Intelligence in Divided Berlin.” Journal of Social History 56, no. 3 (2023): 559-582. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shac030.

    “Israel has committed genocide on the Gaza strip, UN Commission finds.” United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. September 16, 2025.   https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds.

    Johnson, David K. “America’s Cold War Empire: Exporting the Lavender Scare.” In Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression, edited by Meredith L. Weiss and Michael J. Bosia. University of Illinois Press, 2013.

    Kampeas, Ron. “Could the new government endanger Israel’s status as an LGBTQ haven?” The Times of Israel. January 18, 2023. https://www.timesofisrael.com/could-the-new-government-endanger-israels-status-as-an-lgbtq-haven/.

    Koehler, John O. Stasi: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police. Westview Press, 1999.

    “LGBTQ+ Palestinians can request asylum in Israel, court rules.” The Jerusalem Post. February 5, 2024. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-785171.

    “LGBT Rights in Palestine.” Equaldex. https://www.equaldex.com/region/palestine.

    Malcolm, Bryne, and Gregory F. Domber, “Uprising in East Germany, 1953,” The National Security Archive at George Washington University (June 15, 2001). https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB50/.

    Nail, Thomas. “What is an Assemblage?” SubStance 46, no. 1 (2017): 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2017.0001.

    “Palestine,” Human Dignity Trust. December 17, 2024. https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/palestine/.

    Rottmann, Andrea. Queer Lives Across the Wall: Desire and Danger in Divided Berlin, 1945-1970. University of Toronto Press, 2023. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/jj.2960283.

    “Statement on Why We Call the Israeli Attack on Gaza Genocide.” Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security. December 29, 2023. https://www.lemkininstitute.com/statements-new-page/statement-on-why-we-call-the-israeli-attack-on-gaza-genocide.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR/S

    Christopher Belden

    Christopher Belden is a graduate student at American University’s School of International Service, pursuing a Master of Arts in Ethics, Peace, and Human Rights with a certificate in Global Migration. His research focuses on LGBTQ+ justice in global migration and human rights practice. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in History, Economics, and Peace Studies from Manhattan College. Contact: LinkedIn

  • Pushed Into Precarity

    Costa Rican Anti-Asylum Migration Decrees’ Impact on Nicaraguan Migrants & Development

    Image Source: Pixabay; https://tinyurl.com/3r9sxrnw

    By Amanda Clark

    Once praised for its humanitarian approach to migration, Costa Rica now risks that reputation as decrees turn Nicaraguan asylum seekers into a vulnerable labor force, exposing the growing gap between the country’s ideals and its practices.


    Migration between Nicaragua and Costa Rica has a long and complex history, shaped by geographic proximity, shared cultural and linguistic ties, and economic interdependence. As neighboring nations in Central America, the flow of Nicaraguan migrants into Costa Rica dates back to the 19th century, initially driven by a demand for seasonal labor in the agricultural sector. Over time, this migration evolved and became an integral part of Costa Rica’s labor force— particularly in sectors reliant on low-wage workers.[i]

    This paper explores how recent shifts in Costa Rican migration policy, particularly the 2022 anti-asylum decrees, have reshaped the legal and labor conditions of Nicaraguan migrants. While traditional frameworks such as the push-pull functionalist theory and migration hierarchies help explain the volume and direction of migration, they fall short in explaining why migrants remain precarious once they arrive. In this context, precarity involves insecure legal statuses, vulnerability to xenophobia, and lower levels of human development (lower incomes, education levels, and access to healthcare) compared to native citizens. To understand the increasing exclusion and exploitation of Nicaraguan migrants, we must move beyond descriptive models and engage with historical-structural and dual labor market theories, which foreground how systemic inequalities and state interests shape migrants’ access to rights, protections, and long-term integration.

    This analysis unfolds in four parts. First, I trace the historical evolution of Nicaraguan migration and Costa Rica’s formerly rights-centered approach, particularly under the 2010 General Migration Law. Second, I examine how Nicaragua’s political and economic crisis, alongside Costa Rica’s relatively stable labor market, drive the recent surge in migration. I do so through applying the push-pull theory and migration hierarchies to situate these flows within broader regional dynamics. Third, I demonstrate how Costa Rica’s recent legal shifts transform its asylum system into a mechanism of labor extraction. Drawing on historical-structural and dual labor market theories, I show how migrant labor is deliberately kept precarious to maximize its utility to the state and employers. Finally, I assess the implications of this shift for Costa Rica’s broader development goals, arguing that policies that marginalize migrants ultimately undermine inclusive, long-term national development. By analyzing Costa Rica’s migration regime through this layered theoretical lens, I aim to reveal the structural forces behind the country’s evolving approach to migration—a model that increasingly frames migrants not as rights-bearing individuals, but as a flexible labor force whose precarity is central to their economic value.

    Background: Historical Trends and Integration Policy

    The flow of Nicaraguan migrants to Costa Rica dates back to the 19th century, when the route was formed by seasonal labor migration. After almost two centuries of this relatively stable flow, migration increased in the 1990s as a result of growing demand in Costa Rica in the construction, agricultural, and domestic services sectors. Over time, this migration evolved to be an integral part of Costa Rica’s labor force, particularly in sectors reliant on low-wage workers such as agriculture, construction, and domestic labor.[ii] Originally, many of these migrants entered the country irregularly and faced labor rights inequalities in comparison to their Costa Rican counterparts. In response, the Costa Rican government enacted a new migration law in 2010, Ley General de Migración y Extranjería Nº 8764 (the “General Migration Law” in English), which intended to facilitate the regularization of unauthorized workers and better integrate them into the Costa Rican society and workforce.[iii]

             The institution of the General Migration Law marked a shift of the Costa Rican government’s migration policy from enforcement to integration.[iv] For example, Article 31, Paragraph 10 has explicitly integrative language, stating that “every foreign person authorized to legally remain in the country has the right to fully integrate into Costa Rican society.”[v] This law had two major outcomes that are particularly relevant to Nicaraguan migration today. First, it formalized pathways to migrate for work, providing greater security and rights to migrant workers. Second, it set up Costa Rica’s comparatively developed humanitarian protection system, which has historically allowed migrants seeking refugee or asylum status to access work and temporary legal status during their asylum adjudication.[vi]

    The law includes 268 articles that outline the rights of both foreign-born individuals and Costa Ricans.[vii] One of the most notable pieces of this law is Article 31, which states that foreign-born populations hold the same “individual and social rights and guarantees” granted to Costa Ricans by the constitution.[viii] Article 31 outlines the rights of foreign-born people to seek asylum, access social security, and beyond. It also states that “no foreigner who has applied for asylum or who has been granted such status may be expelled, deported, or rejected to another country,” thereby providing special protections for individuals who may face persecution in their country of origin.[ix]

    A series of other articles in the law outline the process of regularization, allowing certain unauthorized migrants to gain legal paperwork for their immigration status.[x] For instance, in direct response to the problem of unauthorized foreign workers, the law allows workers in this category to legalize their status via expedited employment-based temporary residence permits. The law also set up the National Immigration Council, a body composed of representatives of various state and civil society entities that oversee the approval of migration policies and guidelines.[xi]

    The regularization mechanisms were generally considered unsuccessful at first, as there was no clear increase in the number of applications or acceptance rates for temporary and permanent residence in the first three years.[xii] However, the law matured as national policies and plans that could better implement the law’s mandates were developed. As time passed, Costa Rica gradually became known as a “sanctuary” for migrants and refugees, particularly for those who make up the migration flow from Nicaragua.[xiii]

    Political Crisis and An Increasing Flow: Functionalist Push-Pull Models

    In 2018, Nicaraguan university students and civil society activists began protesting Nicaragua’s new Social Security Act, calling for President Daniel Ortega to step down. The protests, which involved an estimated 24-63 deaths due to the use of excessive force by the police and pro-government groups, focused on a pension overhaul plan that increased contributions for workers and employers but lowered all-around benefits.[xiv] Ortega’s government responded to this activism with violent crackdowns, spurring widespread human rights abuses in the months and years to come.[xv] Political repression, persecution of opponents, and human rights violations continue to this day.[xvi]

    In response to these conflating crises, increasing numbers of Nicaraguans have fled the country. As displayed in Figure 1, the number of Nicaraguans migrating towards Costa Rica have trended upwards since 1990, with notable recent increases in 2015 and 2020.[xvii] This trend can be analyzed through simple functionalist push-pull models, where political and economic crises have acted as “push” factors, driving high levels of emigration.[xviii] Simultaneously, the labor opportunities and economic prosperity in neighboring Costa Rica along with peaceful political conditions act as “pull” factors, driving a mass influx of Nicaraguan migrants toward Costa Rica as a destination. In 2024, according to the International Organization on Migration (IOM), more than half a million Nicaraguans (under humanitarian and non-humanitarian statuses) arrived in Costa Rica.[xix] These numbers are slightly higher than the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs’ data and can be explained by the IOM data’s focus on including circular and irregular migration in reports cited.

    Note: (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2024)[xx]

    While the push-pull theory provides a basic descriptive model through which to view the increasing flow of recent years at a macro-scale, migration scholars have criticized it as an oversimplified explanation of migration.[xxi] These pitfalls are evident in the Nicaragua to Costa Rica case study, as the push-pull model fails to fully account for the long history of migration from Nicaragua to Costa Rica and does little to identify “why Costa Rica” as compared to other nations.

    Another analytical tool that helps illuminate the dynamics of Nicaraguan migration to Costa Rica is the migration hierarchies theory. According to Skeldon, a global hierarchy in which countries occupy different roles based on their economic development shape migration patterns.[xxii] In this framework, Costa Rica can be understood as an “expanding core” country, one that experiences both high immigration and emigration rates, while Nicaragua functions as a “labor frontier country.”[xxiii] This helps explain why Costa Rica itself continues to attract large numbers of Nicaraguan migrants, despite the fact that Costa Ricans tend to migrate to other countries like the United States.

    Nicaraguans make up the majority of migrants in Costa Rica (Figure 2). In 2021, 384,894 individuals (66.1% of the 582,483 people who migrated through formal channels) were of Nicaraguan origin.[xxiv] They also represent the largest group of migrants under protected status in Costa Rica— accounting for 73%.[xxv] As of 2024, Nicaraguans comprised approximately 7% of Costa Rica’s total population.[xxvi]

    These numbers illustrate what Miller & Castles refer to as a “migration system” between Nicaragua and Costa Rica, a pattern of sustained migration flows that has historical roots but has expanded considerably in recent years.[xxvii] This migration system, coupled with cultural ties and accumulated social knowledge (including familiarity with Costa Rican institutions, language, and employment networks), reduces the barriers to mobility for Nicaraguans and reinforces Costa Rica’s position within a regional migration hierarchy.

    The approaches of push-pull functionalist and migration hierarchies theories, while useful in explaining the volume and direction of migration flows, fail to account for the deeper systemic forces that shape migrants’ legal status, labor conditions, and integration, or exclusion, upon arrival. As the next sections demonstrate, even as Costa Rica continues to absorb large numbers of Nicaraguan migrants, its legal and labor frameworks, especially following the implementation of Decrees 43809-MGP and 43810-MGP, have increasingly constrained migrants’ rights, access to protection, and prospects for long-term development. To fully grasp these dynamics, we must turn to historical-structural and dual labor market theories, which foreground power relations, economic dependency, and institutionalized labor segmentation.

    Baking Xenophobia Into Law: Recent Decrees through Historical-Structural Theory

    Despite the large number of Nicaraguans living in Costa Rica and the legal protections afforded to them under Costa Rica’s 2010 General Migration Law, Nicaraguan migrants today face significant social exclusion, discrimination, and racial stigma. As Jesús Mora describes, “hostility has historically been latent in Costa Rican-Nicaraguan interpersonal relations.”[xxviii] This stigmatization has intensified in recent years as Nicaraguan migration to the nation has surged in response to Nicaragua’s dual political and economic crisis.[xxix]

    In 2018, Costa Rica witnessed its first anti-immigrant rally in modern history, with native-born Costa Ricans jeering at Nicaraguan migrants and chanting anti-immigrant sentiments.[xxx] During the Covid-19 pandemic, tensions heightened further. Though Costa Rica was able to somewhat contain the first outbreak of the pandemic, its neighbor to the north was not.[xxxi] When the second wave hit and Covid cases spiked in Costa Rica, many natives blamed Nicaraguan migrants.[xxxii]

    Racial and class stigmatization underlie anti-Nicaraguan xenophobia. As Cindy Regidor, a Nicaraguan migrant herself, reflects, “we were, for some, the poor, brown-skinned, simple, inferior, but also sometimes perceived as criminal threats.”[xxxiii] Costa Ricans often pride themselves on being the “whitest” Central American nation, a national identity constructed through the rejection of the general Latin American mestizaje (racially mixed) identity.[xxxiv] As Telles and Flores explain, “in Costa Rica, elites and the popular classes proclaimed themselves all part of the same ‘great national white family,’ even though there was racial mixture among them.”[xxxv] This “whiteness” is associated with peaceful, egalitarian values in the dominant cultural narrative within Costa Rica, which aims to set apart Costa Rica as different and even better than their Central American neighbors.[xxxvi] These dominant narratives thus translate to racist, xenophobic depictions of other Central Americans as “brown-skinned… criminal threats” as Regidor (quoted above) explains.[xxxvii]

    Mounting pressure on Costa Rica’s asylum system compounds these tensions. As of 2025, 75.4% of migrants under protected status in the country are asylum seekers, and nearly 10% are classified as refugees.[xxxviii] Since 2018, Costa Rica has hosted over 300,000 asylum seekers.[xxxix] From 2018 to 2023, an average of 58,700 people sought refugee status annually—21 times the yearly average of the previous six years.[xl] This growing burden on the asylum system has fueled restrictive policy responses.

    In 2022, xenophobic reactions crystallized into law. President Rodrigo Chaves Robles announced two administrative measures ostensibly aimed at easing the administrative burden but with clear exclusionary impacts: Decrees 43809-MGP and 43810-MGP. This legal pivot marks a stark departure from the rights-centered integration framework established by the 2010 General Migration Law (2010) and positions migrants as temporary laborers whose precarity can be leveraged for economic gain. Decree 43810-MGP dramatically redefined asylum eligibility and reduced refugee rights by forcing applicants to file claims within 30 days of arrival, prohibiting access to free open work permits, and disqualifying them if they travel abroad while awaiting a decision. Past claimants are also barred from renewing one-year work permits, and those found working without authorization face deportation.[xli]

    This long list of administrative changes has a significant impact on migrants’ access to asylum. For example, due to the high volume of claims, it is almost impossible for people to get an asylum appointment within their first 30 days in the country. As Lucho, a Nicaraguan migrant, explains, “you have only 30 days to make a claim, and the time runs quickly. Days go by, and you keep on dialing the numbers. You dial 150 times per day, from three different phones, and the call never gets through. Some people told me that they had been dialing for a week with no luck. It is impossible to access a webpage.”[xlii] The inability of refugee claimants to receive an open work permit free of charge also undermines the basic labor rights and integration focus previously outlined by the General Migration Law.

    Decree 43809-MGP created a Temporary Special Category for Nicaraguans, Cubans, and Venezuelans with unresolved refugee claims submitted between 2010 and 2022. These individuals were invited to abandon their asylum applications in exchange for a two-year renewable work permit. While framed as administrative streamlining, this effectively pushed migrants into a temporary labor status, stripping them of long-term protections and formal refugee recognition.

    Though these decrees do not formally repeal the rights outlined in the General Migration Law, they drastically narrow access to asylum. In 2023, 225,000 Nicaraguans sought asylum in Costa Rica, but fewer than 10% of their claims were accepted.[xliii] As Basok and Candiz note, asylum seekers now face “an ‘eternal’ wait, lacking access to jobs and social protections, and pressured to abandon their claims.”[xliv] These policies amount to “internal bordering”—administrative tactics that systematically marginalize migrants while avoiding outright legal bans.[xlv]

    The turn toward restrictive policies can be examined through historical-structural and dual labor market theories. Historical-structural theory views migration as a mechanism of labor control, arguing that capitalist economies rely on managing and exploiting mobile labor forces. As Miller and Castles write, “the control of labor by states and corporations [is] vital to the survival of the capitalist system.”[xlvi] Dual labor market theory complements this by describing how migrant labor is channeled into low-wage, precarious jobs, roles typically avoided by native-born workers.[xlvii] Employers often benefit from migrants’ irregular or temporary statuses, which weaken their bargaining power and make them more “docile” in the face of exploitation.[xlviii] In the Costa Rican context, these employers predominately include international and local agriculture corporations, Costa Rican construction businesses, and even private homeowners with housekeeping and care needs.[xlix]

    Though traditionally used to explain why migration occurs, these theories also illuminate how xenophobia becomes operationalized in policy. As Miller and Castles note, restrictive policies rarely stop migration as long as labor demand persists. Instead, they increase irregular migration and deepen migrant vulnerability.[l] This is precisely what Decrees 43809-MGP and 43810-MGP have done. They have narrowed the legal path to protection while preserving demand for Nicaraguan labor, especially in sectors like construction, domestic work, and agriculture.

    Faced with shrinking options, migrants are pushed toward two precarious outcomes: (a) applying for temporary labor status, which ties them to employer sponsorship, or (b) entering the informal labor market. For those who pursue work permits, employer dependency means that leaving an abusive or exploitative job could result in deportation. However, Costa Rica’s work permit process is “lengthy and complicated,” often taking over eight months to complete.[li] As a result, many Nicaraguans are effectively barred from legal employment, making informal work “the only option… in the short term.”[lii]

    Taken together, historical-structural and dual labor market theories offer a more nuanced understanding of Costa Rica’s recent migration policy shifts. These theories reveal how Nicaraguan migrants are systematically funneled into precarious legal and labor positions—not just as a byproduct of administrative strain, but as a function of deeper structural forces. These frameworks challenge the simplicity of the functionalist push-pull model, which posits that migration flows respond predictably to economic and political incentives. According to that model, the erosion of legal protections for Nicaraguan migrants, such as restricted access to asylum, should reduce migration to Costa Rica and divert the flow towards other nations. However, the opposite has occurred, and migration continues to rise.

    Historical-structural theory helps explain this disconnect.[liii] This theory emphasizes that migration is not merely a matter of individual decision-making or economic opportunity, but a consequence of global capitalist systems that rely on a steady supply of cheap, disposable labor. Push-pull models also fail to explain why migrants, once they arrive, are disproportionately concentrated in specific roles under restrictive legal conditions. From a historical-structural perspective, Costa Rica’s 2022 decrees (43809-MGP and 43810-MGP) function not only as administrative measures, but as mechanisms that institutionalize precarity, thereby increasing the capacity of the state and employers to extract value from migrant labor.

    Dual labor market theory adds further depth by showing how migrants are channeled into the secondary labor market largely because native-born workers avoid these roles. Restrictive asylum policies, in this light, do not deter migration; instead, they redirect it. By closing off formal pathways to protection, the state pushes migrants into irregular or temporary statuses that make them more vulnerable and exploitable. As DeHaas et al. note, “while immigration restrictions often fail to curb migration as long as labor demand persists, they lead to an increase in irregular migration and the increased vulnerability of migrants in labor markets.”[liv] This is precisely the pattern unfolding in Costa Rica. The legal route to asylum is narrowing, but demand for low-wage labor in sectors like agriculture, domestic service, and construction remains high. The result is a growing reliance on informal labor and employer-dependent work permits, both of which reinforce migrant precarity.

    Development Impacts of Nicaraguan Immigration & the Legal Shift

    Nicaraguan migrants have historically played an important role in the development of the Costa Rican economy. The nation reaps the benefit of Nicaraguan migrants’ involvement in labor-intensive sectors like agriculture, construction, and domestic work, a trend that continues today. In rural areas today, the majority of Nicaraguan men (56%) work in agriculture (largely informally), while the largest industry for rural Nicaraguan women is accommodation (24%). As opportunities in other sectors outside of rural agriculture have grown, migration to urban areas increased. Today, 30% of Nicaraguan men in urban Costa Rica work in the construction industry. Throughout both rural and urban Costa Rica, Nicaraguan women largely work in paid domestics jobs (34%).[lv] This data reflects what dual labor market theory predicts: migrants are funneled into sectors where native workers are absent, and their exclusion from protections ensures a compliant labor pool.

    National-level data further support this. For example, compared to the Costa Rican population, the Nicaraguan-born population has a higher proportion of individuals employed in agriculture, construction, households, accommodation, commerce, and the informal sector (Figure 4). Notably, manufacturing and agriculture (sectors in which many Nicaraguans are employed) are two of Costa Rica’s largest sectors, making up a combined 15.1% of the nation’s GDP from 2020-2022[lvi].

             Despite Nicaraguans’ contributions to the Costa Rican economy, they experience significant labor inequalities (Figure 4). Their wage earnings are lower, averaging 36% less than nationals overall and 10% less for low-skilled workers. Higher proportions of Nicaraguans also live in poverty or extreme poverty in Costa Rica. Furthermore, a higher proportion of Nicaraguans have received less than secondary education, trapping them within lower-paying, “low-skilled” sectors.[lvii]

             Nicaraguan labor does not just help support the Costa Rican economy by filling vacant low-skill jobs, it also supports an aging economy. As of 2021, people aged 60 and older represented 9% of the total population of Costa Rica. By 2050, this proportion is expected to more than double, with older adults accounting for about 20% of the population.[lviii] As a result, the dependency ratio (people 65 and older relative to the working-age population) is expected to double between 2022 and 2050, adding pressure to the nation’s social security system. The higher proportion of working-age Nicaraguans and their populations’ high labor market participation rate could help sustain the nation’s economy and meet the rising need for caregivers in the midst of this demographic transition.[lix]

             Furthermore, Nicaraguans’ contribution to Costa Rica’s economy and social security system far outweighs their cost to the system. Estimates suggest that foreign-born workers directly contribute between 6.5 and 12% of the nation’s GDP.[lx] From 2017 to 2021, the economic contribution that the foreign-born population in Costa Rica made through social security contributions (health, pensions and other social contributions) and tax revenue (through income and consumption taxes) reached around 1.1% of GDP. This exceeds the cost to the state of providing the foreign-born population with health services, education services, social transfers, housing benefits, and pensions, which totaled about 0.6% of GDP in the same time period.[lxi] As demonstrated in Figure 5, the impact of the foreign-born population on fiscal revenue and expenditure is net positive, with Nicaraguans contributing a greater net positive impact on fiscal revenue than all other members of the foreign-born population combined.

    Note: (IMF, 2023)

    Altogether, this data shows a significant impact of the migration flow from Nicaragua to Costa Rica on Costa Rican economic development. However, the human development of Nicaraguans in Costa Rica and the development levels of the Nicaraguan economy do not mirror these trends. Outward personal remittances from Costa Rica are quite low, averaging at about 0.6% of GDP from 2017-2021, with 78% of that sent to Nicaragua. Although 69% of Nicaraguans in Costa Rica declared sending remittances during this time period, “their low salaries have limited the overall amount of capital outflows under this category,”[lxii] Scholars like Guiliano & Arranz argue that remittances spur growth in countries of origin through financing investment. [lxiii] However, the remittances that have been sent to Nicaragua do not appear to have made a huge difference in the broader Nicaraguan economy, as Nicaragua remains one of the poorest countries in the Americas.[lxiv] Limited developmental impact of remittances in Nicaragua thus challenge such optimistic narratives about migration as a simple, one-to-one tool for development. From a migration hierarchies perspective, Nicaragua remains trapped as a labor frontier, a source of expendable labor for more stable economies, while systemic underdevelopment persists at home.

    Furthermore, Nicaraguans in Costa Rica face challenges to human development, even as they support the development of the Costa Rican economy. While migrating to Costa Rica provides many Nicaraguans more opportunities for human development than they may have had in Nicaragua, Nicaraguan migrants to Costa Rica still lag behind the Costa Rican-born population on key indicators. Nicaraguans disproportionately experience income inequality, with a higher proportion of Nicaraguans subject to poverty in comparison to Costa Rican counterparts. Nicaraguans in Costa Rica also face barriers in accessing health care, especially those who are undocumented. According to Voorend et al., “migratory status is determinant for access to health insurance, public health care services and medicine” in Costa Rica.[lxv] For example, Nicaraguan-born individuals are almost 28% less likely to be insured compared to their Costa Rican-born counterparts.[lxvi] Scholars have also shown racism against Nicaraguans as a key barrier to healthcare access.[lxvii] Lastly, there is a large gap between Nicaraguans and native-born Costa Ricans in educational status, as Nicaraguans 18-35 years of age are less likely than their Costa Rican counterparts to have attained full secondary education.[lxviii]

    While Nicaraguan migrants contribute significantly to Costa Rica’s economic growth, their precarious legal status and low wages limit their potential for long-term human development. The concentration of Nicaraguans in low-skilled jobs with limited access to education, healthcare, and social services reinforces their marginalization, even as they help sustain key parts of the Costa Rican economy. These dynamics reflect not only an exploitative labor structure, but also broader patterns of inequality rooted in both Costa Rican and Nicaraguan socio-political systems. As historical-structural theory suggests, the intersection of migration, labor exploitation, and restrictive policy frameworks produces uneven development outcomes.[lxix] In this case, Costa Rica reaps economic benefits, while migrant communities remain excluded from meaningful social and economic integration.

    The long-term implications of these restrictive migration policies are troubling for Costa Rica’s broader development goals. By pushing a large segment of Nicaraguan migrants into precarious, low-wage employment, the country risks perpetuating a cycle of economic dependence and inequality. Although these migrants play a vital role in sustaining key industries, their exclusion from social protections and pathways to upward mobility limits not only their individual development but also the country’s overall human capital potential. This marginalization undermines efforts to foster inclusive growth, especially as Costa Rica faces challenges such as an aging population. By maintaining a system that keeps migrants in temporary, vulnerable positions, the state forfeits the long-term gains that could be achieved through fuller integration—such as increased innovation, productivity, and social cohesion. Over time, this approach may exacerbate inequality and create a structurally disenfranchised labor force, ultimately slowing national development and weakening the social fabric.

    Conclusions

    When compared to other countries in the region, Costa Rica stands out for its relatively robust humanitarian legal framework on migration.[lxx] Yet, as this paper has shown, the gap between law and practice is widening. The rise in xenophobia, combined with restrictive policy shifts such as Decrees 43809-MGP and 43810-MGP, reveals a state increasingly unable, or unwilling, to uphold the inclusive values it professes. These recent measures, which reframe Nicaraguan migrants as temporary laborers rather than individuals deserving of long-term protection, undermine the very humanitarian commitments that once distinguished Costa Rica on the international stage.

    Though the decrees have, in theory, decreased “pull” factors by reducing migrants’ rights in Costa Rica, these policies have not reduced migration flows. Instead, they have redirected migrants into increasingly precarious roles within the labor market. Viewed through the lenses of historical-structural and dual labor market theories, these decrees can be understood not as neutral administrative adjustments, but as strategic tools designed to enhance the exploitability of migrant labor. By restricting access to asylum and legal protections, Costa Rica’s policies effectively bolster the interests of the capitalist class at the expense of migrant rights and well-being.

    In doing so, Costa Rica risks eroding both its humanitarian legacy and its long-term development potential. The country now faces a fundamental contradiction: its positions itself as a sanctuary for those fleeing crisis, yet structures its most recent policies in ways that marginalize, exploit, and exclude the very populations it claims to protect. As the line between protection and exploitation becomes increasingly blurred, the challenge for Costa Rica is to confront the structural forces, like xenophobia and class stigmatization, driving this divergence. Without a reorientation toward genuine social inclusion and equitable labor rights, Costa Rica’s model may come to reflect not humanitarian exceptionalism, but the very global inequalities it once sought to transcend.

    End Notes


    [i] Jesús Mora, María. 2021. “Costa Rica Has Welcoming Policies for Migrants, but Nicaraguans Face Subtle Barriers.” Migration Policy Institute, November 5, 2021. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/costa-rica-nicaragua-migrants-subtle-barriers.

    [ii] Ibid.

    [iii] Sojo-Lara, Gabriela. 2015. “Business as Usual? Regularizing Foreign Labor in Costa Rica.” Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/business-usual-regularizing-foreign-labor-costa-rica.

    [iv] Ibid.

    [v] Costa Rica. 2010. Ley General de Migración y Extranjería No. 8764 [General Migration and Immigration Law]. La Gaceta, San José. http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?Valor1=1&nValor2=66139.

    [vi] Jesús Mora, María. “Costa Rica Has Welcoming Policies”

    [vii] Costa Rica. Ley General de Migración y Extranjería.; International Labour Organization (ILO). n.d. Ley núm. 8764 General de Migración y Extranjería. NATLEX. https://natlex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/r/natlex/fe/details?p3_isn=82524.

    [viii] Ibid.

    [ix] Ibid.

    [x] Ibid.

    [xi] Sojo-Lara, Gabriela. “Business as Usual?”

    [xii] Ibid.

    [xiii] Ibid.; Integral Human Development. n.d. Costa Rica Country Profile. Migrants & Refugees Section. Accessed April 3, 2025. https://migrants-refugees.va/country-profile/costa-rica/.

    [xiv] Human Rights Watch. 2018. “Nicaragua: Protests Leave Deadly Toll.” April 27, 2018. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/04/27/nicaragua-protests-leave-deadly-toll.; Diao, Alexis. 2018. “Nicaragua’s President Withdraws Social Security Reforms That Sparked Violent Unrest.” NPR, April 22, 2018. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/04/22/604762080/violent-unrest-continues-in-nicaragua-over-social-security-reforms.

    UN News. 2024. “New UN Report Details Nicaragua’s Ongoing Human Rights Crisis.” UN News, September 2024. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/09/1153891.

    [xvi] Ibid.; ACAPS. n.d.b. Nicaragua. Accessed February 18, 2025. https://www.acaps.org/en/countries/nicaragua.

    [xvii] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), Population Division. 2024. International Migrant Stock 2024. New York: United Nations.

    [xviii] Passaris, C. (1989). Immigration and the evolution of economic theory. International migration (Geneva, Switzerland), 27(4), 525-542.; Castles, Stephen and Miller, Mark J. 2019. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    [xix] International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2024. “Costa Rica – Monitoreo del Flujo Circular Migratorio de Personas Nicaragüenses – Septiembre 2024.”; International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2025. “Costa Rica – Monitoreo del Flujo Circular Migratorio de Personas Nicaragüenses – Diciembre 2024.” Displacement Tracking Matrix. https://dtm.iom.int/reports/costa-rica-monitoreo-flujo-circular-migratorio-personas-nicaraguenses-diciembre-2024.; Displacement Tracking Matrix. https://dtm.iom.int/reports/costa-rica-monitoreo-flujo-circular-migratorio-personas-nicaraguenses-septiembre-2024.; Nicaragua Investiga. 2024. “Más de Medio Millón de Nicaragüenses Llegaron a Costa Rica en 2024.” * Nicaragua Investiga*, December 31, 2024. https://nicaraguainvestiga.com/nacion/158160-mas-de-medio-millon-de-nicaraguenses-llegaron-a-costa-rica-en-2024.

    [xx] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2024. International Migrant Stock 2024.

    [xxi] Castles & Miller. The age of migration.

    [xxii] Skeldon, R. (1997). Rural-to-urban migration and its implications for poverty alleviation. Asia Pacific Population Journal, 12, 3-16.

    [xxiii] Catles & Miller. The age of migration.

    [xxiv] International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2023. ”Contexto Migratorio en Costa Rica y Últimas Tendencias.” Accessed February 19, 2025. https://costarica.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1016/files/documents/2023-05/resumen_mig_cr_02_2023.pdf.

    [xxv] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2025. “Costa Rica.” UNHCR | Global Focus. https://reporting.unhcr.org/operational/operations/costa-rica.

    [xxvi] Lentini, Valeria, and Bruno Carayon. 2024. “Shining a Spotlight on Nicaraguans’ Poverty and Wellbeing in Costa Rica.” UNHCR Blog. https://www.unhcr.org/blogs/shining-a-spotlight-on-nicaraguans-poverty-and-wellbeing-n-costa-rica.

    [xxvii] UNESA, Population Division. International Migrant Stock 2024.

    [xxviii] Jesús Mora. “Costa Rica Has Welcoming Policies.”

    [xxix] IOM. “Contexto Migratorio en Costa Rica.”;  Nicaragua Investiga. “Más de Medio Millón.”; Ripley, Charles G. 2023. “Crisis Prompts Record Emigration from Nicaragua, Surpassing Cold War Era.” Migration Policy Institute, April 19, 2023. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/record-emigration-nicaragua-crisis.

    [xxx] Jesús Mora. “Costa Rica Has Welcoming Policies.”

    [xxxi] Ibid.

    [xxxii] Ibid.

    [xxxiii] Regidor, Cindy. 2024. “Costa Rica and ‘The Others.’” ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America. https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/costa-rica-and-the-others/.

    [xxxiv] Telles, Edward, and René Flores. 2013. “Not Just Color: Whiteness, Nation, and Status in Latin America.” Hispanic American Historical Review 93 (3): 411–49.

    [xxxv] Ibid. 424.

    [xxxvi] Leeds, Asia. 2010. Representations of Race, Entanglements of Power: Whiteness, Garveyism, and Redemptive Geographies in Costa Rica, 1921–1950. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.; Campo-Engelstein, Lisa, and Karen Meagher. 2011. “Costa Rica’s ‘White Legend’: How Racial Narratives Undermine Its Health Care System.” Developing World Bioethics 11 (2): 99–107.

    [xxxvii] Regidor“Costa Rica and ‘The Others.’”

    [xxxviii] Ibid.

    [xxxix] UNHCR. “Costa Rica.”

    [xl] Ibid.

    [xli] Basok, Tanya, and Gabriela Candiz. 2025. “Performing, Contesting, and Resisting Internal Bordering of Refugee Rights in Costa Rica.” Journal of Refugee Studies feae091.

    [xlii] Ibid.

    [xliii] ACAPS. n.d Country Analysis: Costa Rica. ACAPS. Accessed February 18, 2025. https://www.acaps.org/en/countries/costa-rica.

    [xliv] Basok & Candiz. 2025. “Performing, Contesting, and Resisting.”

    [xlv] Jones, Reece, and Corey Johnson. 2014. Placing the Border in Everyday Life. Farnham: Ashgate.; Bonizzoni, Paola. “The border (s) within: Formal and informal processes of status production, negotiation and contestation in a migratory context.” Migration, borders and citizenship: Between policy and public spheres (2019): 217-235.

    [xlvi] Castles & Miller. The Age of Migration. 48.

    [xlvii] Ibid.;

    Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of passage.

    [xlviii] Castles & Miller. The Age of Migration. 53-54.

    [xlix] International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2023. “Characteristics and Economic Impact of Migrants and Refugees in Costa Rica.” IMF E-Library, December 2023. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2023/443/article-A003-en.xml.

    [l] Castles & Miller. The Age of Migration. 51.

    [li] Vega, María. 2023. “Complete Guide to Navigating Work Permits for Hiring in Costa Rica.” Rippling Blog. https://www.rippling.com/blog/work-permits-in-costa-rica.

    [lii] IMF. “Characteristics and Economic Impact.”

    [liii] Castles & Miller. The Age of Migration.

    [liv] Castles & Miller. The Age of Migration. 51.

    [lv] IMF. “Characteristics and Economic Impact.”

    [lvi] IMF. “Characteristics and Economic Impact”

    [lvii] Ibid.

    [lviii] Segura, Sofía Elena. 2021. “The Aging Population in Costa Rica and the Importance of Lifelong Learning.” AARP International. https://www.aarpinternational.org/the-journal/current-edition/journal-articles-blog/2021/12/atj2021-segura.

    [lix] Ibid.

    [lx] Ibid.; Gatica-López, Gustavo. 2017. “Costa Rica as a Source of Emigrants: A Reading from a Political Economy Approach.” Economía y Sociedad 22 (51): 1–22.; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2018. How Immigrants Contribute to Costa Rica’s Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/07/how-immigrants-contribute-to-costa-rica-s-economy_g1g92f58/9789264303850-en.pdf.; Oviedo, Luis. 2022. “Contributions of Recent Migration to Sustainable Development: The Case of Costa Rica.” In On the Contributions of Migration to Sustainable Development: Studies in Selected Countries, edited by Jorge Martínez Pizarro and María Verónica Cano Christiny, Project Documents (LC/TS.2021/195). Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    [lxi] IMF. “Characteristics and Economic Impact”

    [lxii] Ibid.

    [lxiii] Giuliano, Paola, and Marta Ruiz-Arranz. 2009. “Remittances, Financial Development, and Growth.” Journal of Development Economics 90 (1): 144–52.

    [lxiv] ACAPS. Nicaragua.

    [lxv] Voorend, Koen, Ariadna Sánchez Bedo, and Roxana Sura-Fonseca. 2021. “Migrants and Access to Health Care in Costa Rica.” International Institute of Social Studies Research Brief. https://www.iss.nl/en/media/2021-10-final-research-brief-migrants-access-healthcare-costa-rica. 1.

    [lxvi] Ibid

    [lxvii] Campo-Engelstein, Lisa, and Karen Meagher. 2011. “Costa Rica’s ‘White Legend’: How Racial Narratives Undermine Its Health Care System.” Developing World Bioethics 11 (2): 99–107.

    [lxviii] IMF. “Characteristics and Economic Impact.”

    [lxix] Castles & Miller. The Age of Migration.

    [lxx] Jesús Mora. “Costa Rica Has Welcoming Policies.”

    Works Cited

    ACAPS. n.d. “Country Analysis: Costa Rica.” ACAPS. Accessed February 18, 2025. https://www.acaps.org/en/countries/costa-rica.

    ACAPS. n.d.b. “Nicaragua.” Accessed February 18, 2025. https://www.acaps.org/en/countries/nicaragua.

    Basok, Tanya, and Gabriela Candiz. 2025. “Performing, Contesting, and Resisting Internal Bordering of Refugee Rights in Costa Rica.” Journal of Refugee Studies.

    Bonizzoni, Paola. “The border (s) within: Formal and informal processes of status production, negotiation and contestation in a migratory context.” Migration, borders and citizenship: Between policy and public spheres (2019): 217-235.

    Campo-Engelstein, Lisa, and Karen Meagher. 2011. “Costa Rica’s ‘White Legend’: How Racial Narratives Undermine Its Health Care System.” Developing World Bioethics 11 (2): 99–107.

    Castles, Stephen and Miller, Mark J. 2019. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Costa Rica. 2010. Ley General de Migración y Extranjería No. 8764 [General Migration and Immigration Law]. La Gaceta, San José. http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?Valor1=1&nValor2=66139.

    Diao, Alexis. 2018. “Nicaragua’s President Withdraws Social Security Reforms That Sparked Violent Unrest.” NPR, April 22, 2018. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/04/22/604762080/violent-unrest-continues-in-nicaragua-over-social-security-reforms.

    Gatica-López, Gustavo. 2017. “Costa Rica as a Source of Emigrants: A Reading from a Political Economy Approach.” Economía y Sociedad 22 (51): 1–22.

    Giuliano, Paola, and Marta Ruiz-Arranz. 2009. “Remittances, Financial Development, and Growth.” Journal of Development Economics 90 (1): 144–52.

    Human Rights Watch. 2018. “Nicaragua: Protests Leave Deadly Toll.” April 27, 2018. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/04/27/nicaragua-protests-leave-deadly-toll.

    IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2023. “Characteristics and Economic Impact of Migrants and Refugees in Costa Rica.” IMF E-Library, December 2023. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2023/443/article-A003-en.xml.

    International Labour Organization (ILO). n.d. Ley núm. 8764 General de Migración y Extranjería. NATLEX. https://natlex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/r/natlex/fe/details?p3_isn=82524.

    International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2023. ”Contexto Migratorio en Costa Rica y Últimas Tendencias.” Accessed February 19, 2025. https://costarica.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1016/files/documents/2023-05/resumen_mig_cr_02_2023.pdf.

    International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2025. “Costa Rica – Monitoreo del Flujo Circular Migratorio de Personas Nicaragüenses – Diciembre 2024.” Displacement Tracking Matrix. https://dtm.iom.int/reports/costa-rica-monitoreo-flujo-circular-migratorio-personas-nicaraguenses-diciembre-2024.

    International Organization for Migration (IOM). “Costa Rica – Monitoreo del Flujo Circular Migratorio de Personas Nicaragüenses – Septiembre 2024.” Displacement Tracking Matrix. https://dtm.iom.int/reports/costa-rica-monitoreo-flujo-circular-migratorio-personas-nicaraguenses-septiembre-2024.

    Integral Human Development. n.d. Costa Rica Country Profile. Migrants & Refugees Section. Accessed April 3, 2025. https://migrants-refugees.va/country-profile/costa-rica/.

    Jesús Mora, María. 2021. “Costa Rica Has Welcoming Policies for Migrants, but Nicaraguans Face Subtle Barriers.” Migration Policy Institute, November 5, 2021. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/costa-rica-nicaragua-migrants-subtle-barriers.

    Jones, Reece, and Corey Johnson. 2014. “Placing the Border in Everyday Life.” Farnham: Ashgate.

    Leeds, Asia. 2010. “Representations of Race, Entanglements of Power: Whiteness, Garveyism, and Redemptive Geographies in Costa Rica,” 1921–1950. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.

    Lentini, Valeria, and Bruno Carayon. 2024. “Shining a Spotlight on Nicaraguans’ Poverty and Wellbeing in Costa Rica.” UNHCR Blog. https://www.unhcr.org/blogs/shining-a-spotlight-on-nicaraguans-poverty-and-wellbeing-n-costa-rica.

    Nicaragua Investiga. 2024. “Más de Medio Millón de Nicaragüenses Llegaron a Costa Rica en 2024.” Nicaragua Investiga, December 31, 2024. https://nicaraguainvestiga.com/nacion/158160-mas-de-medio-millon-de-nicaraguenses-llegaron-a-costa-rica-en-2024.

    OECD. 2018. How Immigrants Contribute to Costa Rica’s Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/07/how-immigrants-contribute-to-costa-rica-s-economy_g1g92f58/9789264303850-en.pdf.

    Oviedo, Luis. 2022. “Contributions of Recent Migration to Sustainable Development: The Case of Costa Rica.” In On the Contributions of Migration to Sustainable Development: Studies in Selected Countries, edited by Jorge Martínez Pizarro and María Verónica Cano Christiny. Project Documents (LC/TS.2021/195). Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.

    Passaris, C. (1989). Immigration and the evolution of economic theory. International migration (Geneva, Switzerland), 27(4), 525-542.

    Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of passage.

    Regidor, Cindy. 2024. “Costa Rica and ‘The Others.’” ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America. https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/costa-rica-and-the-others/.

    Ripley, Charles G. 2023. “Crisis Prompts Record Emigration from Nicaragua, Surpassing Cold War Era.” Migration Policy Institute, April 19, 2023.

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/record-emigration-nicaragua-crisis.

    Segura, Sofía Elena. 2021. “The Aging Population in Costa Rica and the Importance of Lifelong Learning.” AARP International. https://www.aarpinternational.org/the-journal/current-edition/journal-articles-blog/2021/12/atj2021-segura.

    Skeldon, R. (1997). Rural-to-urban migration and its implications for poverty alleviation. Asia Pacific Population Journal, 12, 3-16.

    Sojo-Lara, Gabriela. 2015. “Business as Usual? Regularizing Foreign Labor in Costa Rica.” Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/business-usual-regularizing-foreign-labor-costa-rica.

    Telles, Edward, and René Flores. 2013. “Not Just Color: Whiteness, Nation, and Status in Latin America.” Hispanic American Historical Review 93 (3): 411–49.

    UN News. 2024. “New UN Report Details Nicaragua’s Ongoing Human Rights Crisis.” UN News, September 2024. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/09/1153891.

    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2024). International migrant stock 2024: Total, destination. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock

    United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2024). Refugee Data Finder. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/download?data_finder%5BdataGroup%5D=displacement&data_finder%5Bdataset%5D=population&data_finder%5BdisplayType%5D=totals&data_finder%5BpopulationType%5D%5B%5D=OOC&data_finder%5Byear__filterType%5D=range&data_finder%5Byear__rangeFrom%5D=2019&data_finder%5Byear__rangeTo%5D=2024&data_finder%5Bcoo__displayType%5D=custom&data_finder%5Bcoo_country%5D%5B%5D=140&data-finder=on&data_finder%5Bcoa__displayType%5D=custom&data_finder%5Bcoa_country%5D%5B%5D=45

    United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2025. “Costa Rica.” UNHCR | Global Focus. https://reporting.unhcr.org/operational/operations/costa-rica.

    Voorend, Koen, Ariadna Sánchez Bedo, and Roxana Sura-Fonseca. 2021. “Migrants and Access to Health Care in Costa Rica.” International Institute of Social Studies Research Brief. https://www.iss.nl/en/media/2021-10-final-research-brief-migrants-access-healthcare-costa-rica.

    Vega, María. 2023. “Complete Guide to Navigating Work Permits for Hiring in Costa Rica.” Rippling Blog. https://www.rippling.com/blog/work-permits-in-costa-rica.


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR/S

    Amanda Clark

    Amanda Clark is the International Regional Organizer for the Americas at the Climate Reality Project and a current student in the Natural Resources and Sustainable Development / International Affairs dual-degree program. She specializes in the intersection of land governance, the protection of environmental defenders, and human rights, with a particular focus on Central America.

  • The 2013 Egyptian Coup d’État: A Watershed for Repression

    Image Source: The Guardian; https://tinyurl.com/369779az

    By Caleb Helsel

    Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s 2013 coup in Egypt marked the end of Egypt’s brief democracy and the birth of a new, more violent autocracy.


    Abstract

                In 2013, Egyptian Minister of Defense Abdel Fattah el-Sisi led a military coup against the democratically elected president, Mohammed Morsi, restoring autocratic rule to Egypt. Egypt’s return to autocracy came after a brief democratic experiment following the fall of its previous dictator, Hosni Mubarak, during the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. After brutal crackdowns on anti-coup demonstrators, Sisi established himself as the undisputed leader of Egypt. Existing scholarship on the topic portrays Sisi’s Egypt as more repressive than that of Mubarak’s or Morsi’s. Thus, this paper utilizes quantitative measures to compare indicators of political repression prior to Sisi’s coup (2010-2012) and after the coup (2013-2016) to determine whether there is an increase in repression under the current Egyptian government. I conclude that Egypt’s 2013 coup represented a critical junction in political repression, with the state successfully suppressing domestic dissent to a degree never seen before in Egypt. The coup also has diplomatic significance in contemporary global politics as Sisi has positioned himself as both a strong, pro-American ally and as a mediating force in regional conflicts.

    Introduction

                With the revolutionary spirit of the Arab Spring spreading across the MENA region (Middle East and North Africa), Hosni Mubarak’s authoritarian rule in Egypt came to an end in February 2011, sparking hope for a democratic Egypt. However, these hopes were diminished in July 2013 when the country’s first democratically elected leader, Mohammed Morsi, was arrested in a military coup led by Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. With the restoration of authoritarianism in Egypt, some practitioners describe Egypt as more repressive today than it was under Mubarak.Research cites the imprisonment of journalists and the massacres committed by agents of the Egyptian state, but numerical evaluations of repression in Egypt under the Sisi regime when compared to the presidencies of Mubarak and Morsi is lacking.[1] This research will explore the effect of the 2013 coup on repression in Egypt. I argue that the 2013 coup d’état and the subsequent rule of Sisi demonstrably increased repression in Egypt. This is demonstrated by the decline in political activism following an intense period of state violence at the onset of Sisi’s rule, on top of existing restrictions on press freedom. This study contributes to a better understanding of Egyptian post-revolutionary governance, and an improved baseline for policymakers and researchers interested in autocracy in the Arab world.

    This paper will first provide a brief synopsis of Egypt’s recent history and will be followed by a quantitative analysis of state repression in Egypt. This research examines the funding for the Central Security Forces (CSF) from 2010-2016 compared to the number of CSF-related civilian deaths and Egypt’s Press Freedom Index Scores to investigate whether there is a significant difference in the level of repression between the pre-coup and post-coup eras. [2]

    Theoretical Framework

    In his work on France’s Bonaparte emperors, Karl Marx describes how liberal-democratic revolutions can be subverted by a single military officer. Marx explains that this subversion occurs when a military officer, such as Sisi, positions himself as a popular champion and uses a coup to claim power in the revolutionary state for himself, stating:

    “Society is saved just as often as the circle of its rulers contracts, as a more exclusive interest is maintained against a wider one. Every demand of the simplest bourgeois financial reform, of the most ordinary liberalism, or the most formal republicanism, of the most insipid democracy, is…castigated as an ‘attempt on society’… Finally, the scum of bourgeois society forms the holy phalanx of order and the hero Crapulinsky [a licentious aristocrat] installs himself…as the ‘saviour of society.’”[3]

    Marx’s description of Louis Bonaparte’s 1851 coup in France, in the quote above, almost perfectly aligns with Sisi’s 2013 coup in Egypt. For a brief period, Egypt was a democratic, “large coalition” regime, as described in the works of Bruce Bueno de Mesquita.[4]      However, following the 2013 coup, the “circle of rulers” contracted as the military reasserted its exclusive control and terminated the democratic, “large coalition” regime that was in place under Morsi. Like Marx’s Crapulinsky, Sisi also portrayed himself as a savior figure. He presented himself and the Egyptian army as a unique, quasi-messianic force that, through Allah’s providence, brought stability to Egypt and saved it from disorder.[5] Furthermore, the 2013 coup caused a contraction in the number of factions with access to power. Monem Said Aly (2011), writing shortly after Mubarak’s downfall, noted that the kaleidoscope of groups that brought down Mubarak’s regime included the Muslim Brotherhood, the Egyptian army, NGOs, established political parties, and hundreds of youth coalitions.[6] However, following Sisi’s coup, the Egyptian military primarily exercised control (as compared to other interest groups).[7]

    Sisi’s regime is deeply centered around his uncontested dominance, a regime type with a significant amount of literature surrounding it. Timothy Frye (2021) has suggested autocracies can be divided into 3 types: single-party regimes, military regimes, and personalist autocracies.[8] Sisi’s regime falls into the category of a personalist autocracy, as Sisi has ensured he is the ultimate source of all authority by eliminating foes in his inner circle and appointing his family members to key military posts.[9] This puts Sisi’s Egypt in the same category as Vladimir Putin’s Russia and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Svolik (2012) categorizes autocracies as “contested” (where the leader must contend with an inner circle of elites all of whom are competing for power) or “uncontested” (where the leader has silenced all meaningful opposition from within the regime).[10] Sisi’s regime is an uncontested autocracy as he centralized power in a way that Mubarak or his predecessors, Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat, never did. In other words, Sisi’s regime does not just repress dissidents on the street, but dissidents within the halls of power as well.

                While Sisi’s coup was efficient and bloodless, the following days were marked by a period of intense state violence, most notably in the 2013 Raba’a Massacre, where over 800 anti-coup dissidents (most estimates say over 1000) were killed en masse by the Egyptian military.[11] For an aspiring personalist autocrat, state violence and repression are the key to uncontested power. Frye explains that, in addition to the autocrats’ dual threats, they also face the dilemma of repression.[12] Excessive repression is expensive and may generate resentment among the population, but too little repression and the opposition will believe that they can freely gather and oppose the regime, a dilemma further elaborated on by Mauricio Rivera (2017).[13] Niccolo Machiavelli ([1532] 2009) alluded to this dilemma when he cautioned leaders that it is better to be feared than loved (if they cannot have both), but above all to avoid being hated.[14] Being feared keeps one’s rule secure, but being hated leads to popular discontent that can bring regimes to the ground, as Mubarak’s regime was. Sisi has been very effective (so far) in threading this needle: utilizing intensely violent repression at the outset of his regime but not accidentally creating a repeat of the events of 2011 since then.

    The Egyptian Military Status Quo

    Since the mid-20th Century, Egypt has primarily been under the control of repressive authoritarian leaders with a military background. In 1952, a group of military leaders known as the Free Officers overthrew the British-backed King Farouk.[15] Four years later, Gamal Abdel Nasser emerged as the leader of the revolutionary military government and began to remake Egypt in his image. Nasser was an Arab nationalist and socialist who harbored a distrust of liberal, multiparty democracy, viewing it as a tool exploited by foreign imperialists and the old aristocracy.[16] As a result, Nasser established a one-party state under his Arab Socialist Union (ASU).[17] Although elections were held under the ASU’s rule, only ASU candidates could appear on the ballot, a process that the New York Times referred to as a “measured democracy.” [18]

    Internationally, this posture attracted the attention of the Soviet Union, which, under Nikita Khrushchev, was eager to expand its diplomatic tent to left-wing governments that did not necessarily conform to orthodox Marxism-Leninism.[19] Nasser initially tried to maintain diplomatic relations with Washington through proliferating US weaponry.[20] However, relations with the US gradually deteriorated until 1967 when American support for Israel in the Six Day War led to Nasser’s regime breaking diplomatically with the United States and fully entering the Soviet orbit.[21]Anwar Sadat succeeded Nasser after the latter’s death in 1970 and constructed a new, liberalized face for the Egyptian regime. While Nasser relied on robust social services, a state-controlled economy, and an Arab nationalist identity to secure legitimacy, Sadat radically broke with this model and led major political and economic reforms.[22] Sadat liberalized the economy to invite foreign investment and raise revenue for the state. He also broke up the ASU into separate leftist, centrist, and rightist political parties and permitted additional political parties.[23] However, Sadat’s centrist party, the National Democratic Party (NDP), maintained full control of Egyptian governing institutions. Thus, Egypt remained a repressive dictatorship with the elite officer corps as the “final arbiters” of Egyptian politics.[24] Although Egypt had evolved from a socialist regime into a “post-populist” liberalized regime under Sadat, the authoritarian nature of the regime, where the ruling coalition consisted largely of elite military officers, persisted.[25]

    On the diplomatic scene, Sadat abandoned the socialist-oriented Arab nationalism of his predecessor and cultivated close relations with the United States, becoming one of its principal anti-Soviet partners in the Middle East.[26] Sadat abandoned Nasser’s alliances with radical, Pan-Arabist regimes like Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya in favor of conservative regimes in the American orbit, such as Saudi Arabia.[27] Sadat collaborated extensively with the United States in diplomatically recovering the Sinai Peninsula from Israel, ultimately doing so at the 1978 Camp David Summit in exchange for recognition of Israeli statehood.[28] In doing this, Sadat’s Egypt endeared itself even more to the West and solidified itself amongst the pro-Western regimes of the Middle East.

    Following Sadat’s assassination in 1981, his vice president, Hosni Mubarak, assumed the presidency.[29] Mubarak implemented reforms that made Egypt appear as if it were on the road to a democratic transition, such as creating an official Human Rights Council, allowing more NGOs to operate in the country, and slightly lowering the barrier of entry for new political parties.[30]  However, he consolidated his own personal power over the Egyptian state, declaring a 30-year-long “State of Emergency.” During this period, he expanded state authority to imprison critics for prolonged periods. Additionally, he prohibited strikes and demonstrations. Many of Mubarak’s contemporaries called him a “pharaoh” because of his centralization of power [31]

    Mubarak also maintained Egypt’s diplomatic stature in relation to the United States and Israel. Mubarak remained a staunch American ally and honored the Camp David Accords. For Egypt’s fealty to the United States, it continued to receive considerable financial and military support, totaling $1.3 billion a year by 2011.[32] However, the United States under President George W. Bush attempted to pressure Mubarak to adopt democratic reforms. Mubarak balked at these demands, holding a multi-party presidential election in 2005 to appease American leaders that lacked genuine freedom and fairness. Ultimately, the Bush Administration backed down from its effort to democratize Egypt, deciding that Mubarak’s dictatorship was a more reliable partner to American interests than a potential democratic one, despite the regime’s growing unpopularity and rampant corruption. [33]

    By 2011, the persistent authoritarianism and corruption of the regime had brought Egypt’s youth to a breaking point. Prominent anti-government social movements had already existed since the early 2000s, criticizing the government’s neoliberal economic policies, fraudulent elections, and control of the judiciary. Ultimately, the overthrow of President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali of nearby Tunisia kicked off a series of revolutions that rocked the Arab world.[34] The sudden, brutal murder of blogger Khaled Said, who police claimed was wanted for theft and weapons possession on June 6, 2010, shocked the country.[35] The regime’s poor attempt to cover it up by claiming the cause of death was a drug overdose brought tensions to a boiling point, and triggered a protest movement launched by online activists that, within less than a year, would grow into a revolution demanding the resignation of Mubarak.[36] The revolutionaries would get their wish on February 11, 2011, when Mubarak agreed to step down as president, ending a 30-year presidency and an authoritarian system that had existed since the Free Officers revolt in 1952.

    Egypt’s brief democratic aspirations began with the hope for a brighter future. Following a brief interim government led by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), elections were organized for the summer of 2012.[37] Mohammed Morsi won the presidential election with approximately 51% of the vote.[38] Morsi was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, a long-suppressed Islamist political organization advocating for the Islamization of both government and society.[39] Morsi was the first (and so far, only) leader in all Egyptian history to ascend to power in a free and fair democratic election. Unfortunately for Morsi, his term was short-lived.

    Morsi’s government lost legitimacy with key supporters within a year of his inauguration.[40] Morsi pushed unpopular constitutional reforms that increased his government’s control over the judicial branch and various government ministries and enshrined Islamic law as the basis for legislation. Such a move legitimized fears among secularists of a theocratic takeover of the government.[41] Furthermore, Morsi alienated the old guard of the military by replacing many of their top leaders.[42] While doing so, he ironically appointed General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi as Minister of Defense— the man who would soon overthrow him. In diplomacy, Morsi challenged the role of the United States in the Middle East, calling on them to end their unequivocal support for Israel and dictatorships like that of Mubarak. This move may have discouraged the United States from supporting Egypt’s democratic experiment.[43] On June 30, 2013, major protests broke out in Cairo demanding Morsi’s resignation. The Egyptian military, under Sisi’s command, seized the opportunity and forcibly ousted Morsi on July 3.[44] Sisi was formally sworn in as President of Egypt in 2014 and has served as Egypt’s leader ever since.[45]

    After a brief democratic interlude following the 2011 Revolution, Sisi restored military autocracy to Egypt, specifically the pro-Western variety of Sadat and Mubarak. Independent election monitoring criticized the 2014 Presidential election, the first to feature Sisi as a candidate, as marked by a climate of repression and a lack of media freedom.[46] Since then, there has not been another free and fair Egyptian election, and Egyptian political activity has been brutally curtailed. As I will argue, Sisi’s new authoritarianism is more repressive than the regimes that preceded it.

    A Watershed for International Relations

    Sisi’s regime remains an ally of the United States. President Barack Obama declined to call Sisi’s actions in 2013 a “coup,” which would have triggered U.S. laws preventing military aid to states after a military coup. The United States continued arms and equipment shipments to Egypt, viewing Sisi as a partner in the fight against the emergent Islamic State.[47] President Donald Trump referred to Sisi as his “favorite dictator” in 2019, and at the 2025 Gaza Peace Summit, Trump praised Sisi as “my friend, a strong leader, the president.”[48]

    Despite continuing to cultivate a relationship with the United States, Egypt has begun to court Russia and China as well, seeking to diversify its partnerships. As of 2024, Egypt is a member of BRICS, where it hopes to gain additional financing from BRICS-linked institutions, such as the New Development Bank, to improve its economy on top of the money it already receives from the West. [49] Egypt is a part of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative and has begun to receive substantial Chinese investment. Notably, Sisi’s project to create a New Capital 30 miles outside of Cairo is heavily financed by China, with the Chinese state-owned China State Construction Engineering Corporation playing a central role.[50] Egypt also maintains a consistent relationship with Russia despite its invasion of Ukraine, sustaining economic ties and, at one point, Egypt considered sending 40,000 rockets to the Russian military, leading to diplomatic tensions with the United States. [51]

     Sisi’s Egypt is a key mediator in the Israel-Hamas War that began in 2023, alongside Qatar. Egypt has participated in nearly every negotiation between Israel and Hamas since the current hostilities began.[52] The Gaza Strip is particularly relevant to Egypt as Israel has repeatedly threatened to displace Gazans into the Sinai Peninsula.[53] This is a red line for Egypt, as Egypt fears the mass influx of Palestinians could turn the Sinai into a staging ground for attacks on Israel, which would open Egypt to Israeli attacks.[54] Egypt also fears cooperation between existing Islamic State insurgents in the Sinai and Palestinian militant groups—though not Hamas—which is an enemy of IS and has collaborated in the past with Egypt against the Sinai insurgents. [55]  As such, Egypt has played an active role in mediating discussions around Gaza with the goal of lasting peace on its border and an independent, unified, stable Palestinian state. [56]

    Hypotheses

                H1: An increase in funding for the Central Security Forces will result in an increase in civilian deaths from the Security Forces.

    The Central Security Forces (CSF) is a paramilitary organization that was created under Nasser’s rule in 1969. Every Egyptian regime from Sadat to Sisi has used the CSF as the “central arm in crushing street dissent.”[57] As the main instrument of the Egyptian state’s anti-protest apparatus, it can logically be assumed that CSF funding increases would lead to a greater capacity for state repression.  Thus, there would be more civilian deaths during periods of social unrest.

    H2: An increase in funding for the Central Security Forces will cause a decrease in Egypt’s Press Freedom Index score.

    As the CSF receives greater funding, this paper hypothesizes that this increase will lead to overall greater repression in Egypt, therefore, reducing Egypt’s Press Freedom Index score as journalists will be coerced into compliance with the Sisi regime.

    Methods and Data

    A mixed approach of quantitative and qualitative methods captures the multidimensionality of the issue at hand. This study will find the correlation coefficient between CSF funding and civilian deaths and compare the averages for each variable across the pre- and post-coup periods.[58] This will be supplemented by additional qualitative analysis of relevant literature to contextualize the quantitative results.

    Funding for the Central Security Forces refers to the money allocated to the CSF by the Ministry of the Interior under the Egyptian government budget. To find CSF funding, this paper will use the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute’s (SIPRI) 2020 paper “Understanding Egyptian Military Expenditure,” which gives data on estimated CSF funding for fiscal years 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. This data is sourced from the official Egyptian national budgets mentioned.[59] For previous years, SIPRI provided the formula that it used to calculate the 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 CSF funding.

    (Y= CSF funding, X= Allotment for “Public Order and Public Safety Affairs” in the Egyptian budget)

    I will apply SIPRI’s formula to the Egyptian budgets from 2010-2015, provided by the Collaborative Africa Budget Reform Initiative.

    Press freedom, as defined by Freedom House (2022), is “the ability of journalists to report freely on matters of public interest.”[60] To measure press freedom, this paper will use Reporters Without Borders (RSF)’ Press Freedom Index, which has ranked countries on a numerical scale for press freedom since 2002.[61] A country first in the Press Freedom Index is the country with the least restrictive environment for journalists, while the country last in the ranking has the most repressive environment. This paper will compare scores for Egyptian press freedom for every year from 2010 to 2016 to determine the statistical significance in the difference between pre-coup and post-coup years and its correlation to CSF funding.

    Civilian deaths will be defined as deaths from political protest, sectarian events, extrajudicial killings, or incidents involving excessive force by authorities during events involving the CSF.  To measure this variable, this paper will examine independent datasets to compare the number of civilian deaths in political incidents in which the CSF was involved. It will determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-coup periods. The data sources for these fatalities include Wiki Thawra, an Egyptian dissident NGO that cataloged incidents of repression in Egypt during and following the Egyptian Revolution of 2011; the UT Austin Strauss Center Social Conflict Analysis Database (SCAD), which was used for civilian deaths data from 2010 and 2014-2015; and the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), which was used for 2016 civilian death data.[62] It should be noted that it is often difficult to get accurate data on deaths caused by agents of the state’s coercive apparatus.[63] As Egypt is an authoritarian regime, finding accurate statistics is even more difficult, and datasets may vary drastically.

    Results

    Figure 1 – Estimated CSF Funding from Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to 2016-2017 (EGP)

    Source: SIPRI, Egyptian national budgets

                Figure 2 – Civilian Deaths from Political Incidents Involving Security Forces

    Source: Wiki Thawra, SCAD[64], ACLED[65]. Wiki Thawra translation help provided by Huda Alazani

    Figure 3: Egyptian Position in the Reporters Without Borders ranking

    YearRanking
    2010127
    2011-2012*166
    2013158
    2014159
    2015158
    2016159

    Source: Reporters Without Borders[66] *2011-2012 were combined for RSF’s ratings

                As shown in Figure 1, CSF funding had a large spike immediately after the coup in FY 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 before falling in the following years. Figure 2 shows that civilian deaths were highest in 2011 (the year of the Revolution) and 2013 (the year of the coup), and lowest in 2010 and 2016. Figure 3 shows that Egypt’s Reporters Without Borders rating was worst in the 2011-2012 period (during the Revolution), before plateauing between ranking 158 and 159 in the world afterwards.

    Analysis

    The findings suggest that increased funding for the CSF had a negligible effect on press freedom. Press freedom remained stagnant throughout the studied period. The pre-coup average was 146.5, while the post-coup average was 158.5, a difference which is not statistically significant. The correlation coefficient with CSF Funding was r= 0.32, indicating a weak correlation between CSF funding and Egypt’s Reporters Without Borders ranking. In context, these findings are reasonable as major news agencies under both Mubarak and Sisi, such as Al Ahram, are state controlled, and independent media are harassed and detained under Sisi as they were under Mubarak. [67] The brief democratic interlude of Morsi did not roll back Mubarak’s media censorship, and censorship continued under Mubarak-era laws until Morsi’s overthrow.[68]

    However, civilian deaths are a more complicated issue. The correlation coefficient between CSF funding and civilian deaths was r = 0.18, indicating a very weak correlation between the two. However, examining the issue of civilian deaths more broadly, we see a clear numerical impact. The average number of deaths per year in the pre-coup period was 443, while in the post-coup period it was 766.25, within the standard deviation of the pre-coup period.[69] This number, however, does not give the full story. In 2013, the year of Sisi’s coup, civilian deaths in political incidents involving Security Forces reached their height of 2,661. Significantly above the upper standard deviation of the pre-coup period, while the period of 2014-2016 saw a sharp decline, culminating in only 45 deaths in 2016. Had this measurement been used alone, both hypotheses would be rejected. Still, this inconsistency may be explained with some additional context.

    Nadine Sika’s 2018 study on Egyptian youth activism reveals that, after brutal shows of force by the regime in the aftermath of the coup (most infamously in the Raba’a Massacre), activists were too afraid of violence or arrest to take part in political events.[70] As Sika explains:

    Many young activists have voiced their “fear” not only of demonstrating on the street, but also of creating street art, graffiti, attending music festivals, or even just taking photographs on the streets. They fear political violence both from the authorities and from the citizens at large, who have been exposed to the media campaigns against young activists. ‘I feel that all my freedoms and rights were all of a sudden taken away. So now I am afraid to work in the public space. I have a lot of fear.’[71]

    Political activity, which was tolerated under Mubarak, the SCAF, and Morsi, was brutally suppressed under Sisi.[72] Members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the main opposition to Sisi’s rule, report the post-coup violence to be a deeply traumatic experience “which prompted them to abandon political activism and focus on their career and personal life.”[73] With this in mind, we can contextualize the data that we observed in this study and see, in the words of King, Keohane, and Verba (1994), an “observable implication” of the 2013 coup.[74]

    The coup resulted in a brutal crackdown on protestors in 2013 in the immediate aftermath. Egyptian activists, who had previously been energized by the success against Mubarak and SCAF, were now thoroughly eliminated as a political force, too frightened by the events of 2013 to dare risk engaging in political activity.[75] With less political activity came fewer clashes with the CSF, and thus the sharp reduction in deaths from 2014-2016. The year 2013, therefore, represents a “critical juncture,” as a period of institutional flux that dramatically changed the status quo.[76] The post-coup violence in 2013 was a substantial event that changed the nature of political activity in Egypt. The paper’s first hypothesis is supported by contextual evidence indicating that the 2013 post-coup repression in Egypt was a flashpoint that successfully quashed opposition to the Sisi regime and sharply reduced future political activities. However, I am rejecting my second hypothesis due to a lack of evidence of significant change during the period.                                                    

    Conclusion

                2013 marked a dramatic end to Egypt’s democratic experiment. Military authoritarianism returned to Egypt in a more repressive and violent form than it had ever witnessed before. This paper concludes that there was an observable increase in repression in Egypt in the aftermath of the coup. 2013 witnessed a brutal government crackdown on dissent, where civilian deaths briefly skyrocketed. This effectively eliminated any threat to the Sisi regime emerging from the populace, which had the effect of starkly reducing civilian deaths. However, the second hypothesis that press freedom would decline was unsupported, as Egypt’s Reporters Without Borders average ranking did not change significantly after the coup, nor did the change in ranking have a strong correlation to funding for the CSF.

                The United States’ continued relationship with the Sisi regime following the coup and its subsequent bloodshed demonstrates another aspect of these events: Egypt was more convenient for the United States as a dictatorship than a democracy. Under Sadat and Mubarak, the United States supplied political, military, and financial support to Egypt as a Cold War, anti-communist ally. Even after the Cold War ended, the United States continued to see Egypt as a core component of its Middle East strategy and continued to back Mubarak’s regime despite its unpopularity, corruption, and unwillingness to truly democratize. Morsi’s brief stint as President and his open criticism of the United States and Israel made Egypt an unreliable partner, a fact that was quickly rectified by Sisi. The United States was willing to cast aside a democratically elected Morsi in favor of a ruthlessly repressive Sisi, who they likely saw as a more valuable partner.

                Suggestions for future research include replicating this paper’s methodology with different variables, such as arrests or internet censorship, to outline more aspects of state violence in Egypt that goes beyond just those killed. In addition, many other authoritarian states have special security forces solely for the purpose of crowd control and protest suppression. In particular, the National Guard of Putin’s Russia and the SAVAK of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s Iran bear many similarities to Egypt’s CSF. These may be ideal areas for further application of the framework utilized in this research. On the diplomatic side, the United States’ continued support for Egypt despite American legislation preventing military aid following a military coup opens areas of research into Congressional legislation on foreign policy, and its failure to constrain the President in foreign policy or enforce human rights standards. This is particularly relevant in the context of Israel’s actions in Gaza, where the United States continues to supply military equipment to Israel despite credible accusations of war crimes and genocide by the Israeli state.

    A limitation of this research was that English translations of Egypt’s budgets (or budgets that SIPRI had already used in their work) were only available from 2010 onward. Future research may include applying the SIPRI’s CSF formula to the remaining budgets from 1981-2009 to get a more complete picture of repression in the Mubarak years.

    Bibliography                             

    “حصر قتلى عهد محمد مرسي تفصيلياً (محدث)” [Listing the Dead of the Era of Mohammed Morsi in Detail (Updated)]. 2013. Wiki Thawra, June 26, 2013

    “حصر قتلي الـ 18 يوم الأولي من الثورة تفصيليا” [Listing the Deaths of the First 18 Days of the Revolution in Detail]. 2013. Wiki Thawra, October 23, 2013.

    “حصر قتلى عهد السيسي/عدلي منصور تفصيلياً (مُحَدَّث) حتي 31 يناير 2014” [Inventory of the dead in the era of Sisi/Adly Mansour (Updated) Until January 31, 2014]. 2014. Wiki Thawra.

    Abdulla, Rasha, Thomas Poell, Bernhard Rieder, Robbert Wolterning, and Liesbeth Zack. 2018. 

    “Facebook Polls as Proto-Democratic Instruments in the Egyptian Revolution: The ‘We Are All Khaled Said’ Facebook page.” Global Media and Communication 14, no. 1: 141–160. 

    Aboudouh, Ahmed. “Egypt Now Sees Israel as an Imminent Threat.” Chatham House. Last modified September 17, 2025. Accessed November 25, 2025. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/09 egypt-now-sees-israel-imminent-threat#:~:text=A%20warning%20wrapped%20in%20angst,from%20Sinai%20and%20invite%20retaliation.

    Aburish, Said K. Nasser: The Last Arab. New York: St. Martin’s Press/Thomas Dunne Books, 2004. Accessed October 25, 2025. https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780312286835/page/272/mode/2up?q=272.

    ACLED. 2022. “Data Export Tool.” https://acleddata.com/data-export-tool/. Accessed November 25, 2022.

    AFP. “Gaza Mediators ‘Working Very Hard’ to Revive Truce Plan: Egypt.” Arab News. Saudi Research & Publishing Company. Last modified August 12, 2025. Accessed November 26, 2025. https://www.arabnews.com/node/2611614/middle-east.

    Al-Anani, Khalil. 2019. “Rethinking The Repression-Dissent Nexus: Assessing Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood’s Response To Repression Since the Coup of 2013.” Democratization 26, no. 8: 1329–1341.

    Al Jazeera Staff. “What Happened during Egypt’s January 25 Revolution?” Al Jazeera, January 25, 2023. Accessed September 18, 2024. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/1/25/what-happened-during-egypts-january-25-revolution.

    ___. “US, Qatar and Egypt Say Mediators Will Work to Finalise Gaza Ceasefire Deal.” Al Jazeera. Last modified August 16, 2024. Accessed November 26, 2025. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/16/us-qatar-and-egypt-say-mediators-will-work-to-finalise-gaza-ceasefire-deal.

    Almutairi, Faris M. 2023. “Nationalist Revolution and its Influence on Political and Social Democracies: Educational and Agricultural Systems under Nasser, 1952–1970.” Annals of the Faculty of Arts 52. 

    Al-Tahhan, Zena. “‘Egyptian Society Being Crushed’ Five Years After Military Coup” Al Jazeera, July 2, 2018. Accessed November 1, 2022. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2018/7/2/egyptian-society-being-crushed-five-years-after-military-coup 

    Aly, Monen Said. “The Paradox of the Egyptian Revolution.” Middle East Brief, September 2011. Accessed October 28, 2025. https://www.academia.edu/41758249/The_Paradox_of_the_Egyptian_Revolution.

    Associated Press. “Mubarak Casts Shadow over U.S. Policy.” Politico. Last modified August 20, 2013. Accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/egypt-hosni-mubarak-095701.

    Aziz, Sahar. “U.S. Foreign Aid and Morsi’s Ouster.” Middle East Institute. Last modified July 31, 2013. Accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.mei.edu/publications/us-foreign-aid-and-morsis-ouster#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20government%20announced,in%20support%20of%20democracy%20abroad.

    Baram, Marcus. 2011. “How The Mubarak Family Made Its Billions.” HuffPost, May 25, 2011. Accessed September 13, 2024. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-the-mubarak-family-made-its-billions_n_821757.

    Black, Ian. “Egyptian Editors Jailed for Defaming Mubarak.” The Guardian. Last modified September 14, 2007. Accessed November 12, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/sep/14pressandpublishing.egypt#:~:text=Gasser%20Abdel%2DRazek%2C%20of%20Human,website%C%20to%20ponder%20the%20question.

    Brown, Nathan J. 2012. “Egypt’s Judges in a Revolutionary Age.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, February 22, 2012. Accessed September 13, 2024. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2012/02/egypts-judges-in-a-revolutionary-age?lang=en. 

    Brownlee, Jason. 2007/8. “The Heir Apparency of Gamal Mubarak.” The Arab Studies Journal 15–16, no. 2/1: 36–56. 

    ——. 2011–2. “Peace Before Freedom: Diplomacy and Repression in Sadat’s Egypt.” Political  Science Quarterly 126, no. 4: 641–668. 

    Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Alastair Smith. 2011. The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Byroade, Henry A. Telegram, “132. Telegram from the Embassy in Egypt to the Department of State,” June 17, 1955. Accessed October 24, 2025. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v14d132#fn:1.7.4.6.8.372.26.3.

    The Camp David Accords: The Framework for Peace in the Middle East. Egypt-Israel. September 17, 1978.

    Capoccia, Giovanni, and R. Daniel Kelemen. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (April): 341–369.

    “Celebration in Egypt as Morsi Declared Winner.” 2012. Al Jazeera, June 24, 2012. Accessed September 20, 2024. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2012/6/24/celebration-in-egypt-as-morsi-declared-winner.

    Clarke, Killian, and Korhan Kochak. 2018. “Launching Revolution: Social Media and the Egyptian Uprising’s First Movers.” British Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3: 1025–1045.

    Cook, Steven A. “Egypt Goes From Bad to Worse: Under President Sisi, the Nation Longs for the Good Old Days of Mubarak.” Council on Foreign Relations, April 3, 2017. Accessed November 19, 2022. https://www.cfr.org/blog/egypt-goes-bad-worse-under-president-sisi-nation-longs-good-old-days-mubarak. 

     —- .2018. “Sisi Isn’t Mubarak. He’s Much Worse.” Foreign Policy, December 19, 2018. Accessed November 18, 2022. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/19/sisi-isnt-mubarak-hes-much-worse/.

    Crowley, Michael. “‘We Caved’ What Happened When Barack Obama’s Idealistic Rhetoric Collided with the Cold Realities of War and Dictatorship in the Middle East and Beyond.” Politico Magazine, January 2016. Accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/we-caved-obama-foreign-policy-legacy-213495/.

    Dessouki, Ali E. Hillal. “Shifting Tides: Egypt’s Unexpected Path after the 1973 War.” The Cairo Review of Global Affairs. American University in Cairo.
    Last modified 2023. Accessed October 27, 2025.
    https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/shifting-tides-egypts-unexpected-path-after-the-1973-war/.

    DeYoung, Karen. “Russia Urged Egypt to Send Rockets, in Sign of Its Need for Munitions.” Edited by Cate Brown. The Washington Post. Last modified April 17, 2023. Accessed November 11, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/17/russia-ukraine-egypt-weapons-leaked-documents/.

    Egypt Today Staff. “Egypt’s New Administrative Capital Rebranded as ‘New Capital’ in Official Correspondence.” Egypt Today. United Media Services. Last modified November 8, 2025. Accessed November 10, 2025. https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/143350Egypt%E2%80%99s-New-Administrative-Capital-rebranded-as-%E2%80%98New-Capital%E2%80%99-in-official.

    Egypt. Law 40/1977. “Concerning the Political Parties System and its Amendments.” 1977. Egypt. Law 177/2005. 2005.

    “Egypt’s Gaza Dilemmas.” International Crisis Group. Last modified May 16, 2024. Accessed November 11, 2025. https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/egypt-israelpalestine/b91-egypts-gaza-dilemmas.

    “Egypt’s Last Pharaoh? The Rise and Fall of Hosni Mubarak.” TIME, February 12, 2011. https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2045328_2045338_2048689,00.html.

    El-Bendary, Mohamed Nabil. “Egypt’s Delicate Balance: Maintaining US Support While Confronting Gaza Challenges.” Stimson Center. Last modified April 18, 2025. Accessed November 11, 2025. https://www.stimson.org/2025/egypts-delicate-balance-maintaining-us-support-while-confronting-gaza-challenges/

    El-Chazli, Hannah, Neil Ketchley, and Elsisi. 2021. Interview by David Siddartha Patel. Transcript. January 28, 2021. Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.

    El-Hamalawy, Hossam. 2012. “In Egypt, Mubarak’s Repression Machine Is Still Alive and Well.” The Guardian, May 16, 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/16/egypt-mubaraks-repression-machine-alive-well.

    El-Sisi, Abdel Fattah. 2014. “Statement by President Abdel Fattah El Sisi at Ceremony Marking 

    His Inauguration.” Speech, June 9, 2014. https://www.sis.gov.eg/Story/78278/Statement-by-President-Abdel-Fattah-El-Sisi-at-ceremony-marking-his-inauguration?lang=en-us.

    Extraordinary Arab Summit (Palestine Summit). “Cairo Statement Issued by the Extraordinary Arab Summit (Palestine Summit).” News release. March 5, 2025. Accessed November 11, 2025. https://www.presidency.eg/en/قسم-الأخبار/أخبار-رئاسية/news532025/.

    Freedom House. 2022. “Media Freedom.” Accessed December 2, 2022. https://freedomhouse.org/issues/media-freedom.

    Frye, Timothy. 2021. Weak Strongman: The Limits of Power in Putin’s Russia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Gilbert, Ben. “Egypt’s Journalists Struggle under Mubarak-era Laws.” NBC News. Last modified December 9, 2012. Accessed November 12, 2025. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/egypts-journalists-struggle-under-mubarak-era-laws-flna1c7510084.

    Hashin, Ahmed S. 2011. “The Egyptian Military Part One: From the Ottomans Through Sadat.” Middle East Policy 18, no. 3: 63–78. 

    Hassan, Hamdy A. 2011. “Civil Society in Egypt Under the Mubarak Regime.” Afro Asian Journal of Social Sciences 2, no. 2.2.

    Hassan, Nayra Mahmoud. 2023. “Leader’s Political Ideology and Decision- Making Process: Nasser as Case Study.” Future Journal of Social Science 2, no. 2: 67–87.

    Hawthorne, Amy, and Andrew Miller. 2019. “Worse Than Mubarak.” Foreign Policy, February 27, 2019. Accessed November 18, 2022. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/02/27/worse-than-mubarak/.

    Human Rights Watch. Monopolizing Power: Egypt’s Political Parties Law. January 2007, Number 1. New York: Human Rights Watch. Accessed October 15, 2025. https://www.hrw.org/report/2007/01/04/monopolizing-power/egypts-political-parties-law

    ____. 2014. “All According to Plan: The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of  Protestors in Egypt.” August 12, 2014. Accessed November 23, 2022. https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/08/12/all-according-plan/raba-massacre-and-mass-killings-protesters-egypt

    Johnson, Janet B., H.T. Reynolds, and Jason D. Mycoff. 2016. Political Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.

    Joya, Angela. 2011. “The Egyptian Revolution: Crisis of Neoliberalism and the Potential for Democratic Politics.” Review of African Political Economy 38, no. 129: 367–386.

    King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific  Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Kingsley, Patrick. 2014. “Egypt’s Sisi Sworn In as President.” The Guardian, June 8, 2014. Accessed September 11, 2025 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/08/egypt-sisi-sworn-in-president.

    Kirkpatrick, David D. 2012. “Egyptian Is Counting On Worries of Elites.” The New York Times, May 27, 2012. Accessed September 17, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/28/world/middleeast/ahmed-shafik-counting-on-egyptian-elites-fears.html. 

    ___., and Steven Erlanger. “Egypt’s New Leader Spells Out Terms for U.S.-Arab Ties.” The New York Times. Last modified September 23, 2012. Accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/23/world/middleeast/egyptian-leader-mohamed-morsi-spells-out-terms-for-us-arab-ties.

    —- and Mayy El Sheikh. 2012. “Citing Deadlock, Egypt’s Leader Seizes New Power and Plans 

    Mubarak Retrial.” The New York Times, November 22, 2012. Accessed September 17, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/23/world/middleeast/egypts-president-morsi-gives-himself-new-powers.html.

    Kuimova, Alexandra. 2020. “Understanding Egyptian Military Expenditure.” SIPRI, October 

    2020. Accessed October 7, 2022. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/bp_2010_egyptian_military_spending.pdf. 

    Lafi Youmans, William. “An Unwilling Client: How Hosni Mubarak’s Egypt Defied the Bush Administration’s ‘freedom Agenda.’” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29, no. 4 (2015): 1209-32. Accessed October 27, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1018137.

    Laub, Zachary. “Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.” Council on Foreign Relations. Last modified August 15, 2019. Accessed November 9, 2025. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/egypts-muslim-brotherhood#chapter-title-0-1.

    Lavie, Limor. “From Pharaoh to Hero: Contested Constructions of Mubarak’s Image
     in Egyptian Post-uprising Collective Memory.” British Journal of Middle
     Eastern Studies, September 9, 2024, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/
     13530194.2024.2400906.

    Machiavelli, Niccolo. [1532] 2009. The Prince. Translated by Tim Parks. Jouve: Penguin Random House.

    Mandour, Maged, and Hossam el-Hamalawy. 2024. “Understanding Sisi’s Grip on Power.”

    Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, June 18, 2024. Accessed September 10, 2024. https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/52220/understanding-sisis-grip-on-power.

    Marx, Karl. (1851) 1978. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In The Marx-Engels 

    Reader. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Mirshak, Nadim. “The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt: A Gramscian Re-examination.”

                  Current Sociology 71, no. 3 (2021): 489-508. Accessed November 9, 2025.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211039273.

    Nassif, Hicham Bou. 2013. “Wedded to Mubarak: The Second Careers and Financial Rewards of Egypt’s Military Elite, 1981–2011.” Middle East Journal 67, no. 4: 509–530.

    Najjar, Fauzi M. 2011. “Mubarak’s Constitutional Reforms.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 38, no. 1: 7–22.

    “Nasser’s ‘Measured Democracy.’” 1964. New York Times, March 23, 1964. Accessed 

    September 11, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/1964/03/23/archives/nassers-measured-democracy.html.

    Nyabiage, Jevans. “China at the Centre of Egypt’s New Capital Which Will House 6
    Million People.” South China Morning Post. Alibaba Group. Last modified June 9, 2025. Accessed November 11, 2025. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3313333/china-centre-egypts-new-capital-which-will-house-6-million-people.

    Ottaway, Marina. 2021. “Abdicating Responsibility: Political Parties in Egypt.” Wilson Center, May 25, 2021. Accessed September 12, 2024. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/abdicating-responsibility-political-parties-egypt.

    Patrick, Stewart, Erica Hogan, Oliver Stuenkel, et al. “BRICS Expansion and the Future of World Order: Perspectives from Member States, Partners, and Aspirants.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Last modified March 31, 2025. Accessed November 12, 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org research/2025/03/brics-expansion-and-the-future-of-world-order-perspectives-from-member-states-partners-and-aspirants?lang=en#egypt.

    People’s Daily Press. “Chinese Firm Finalizes Deal for Building Huge Business

                District in Egypt’s New Capital.” People’s Daily. Last modified October 12,

                2017. Accessed November 11, 2025. http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/1012/

                c90000-9278780.html.

    Pitts, James. 2022. “Justice or Just Us: Media Portrayals and the Context of Police Violence.” 

    Lecture presented to Dr. Everett Vieira’s Political Violence class, Fresno, CA.

    “Press Freedom Recommendations for President Mubarak’s Fifth Term.” Reporters

     Without Borders. Last modified September 9, 2005. Accessed November 12,

     2025. https://rsf.org/en/press-freedom-recommendations-president-mubaraks-fifth-     term#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThis      %20is%20why%20the%20press,%2C%E2%80%9D%20Reporters%20Without%20Borders%20concluded.

    Reporters Without Borders. 2025. “Egypt.” https://rsf.org/en/country/egypt. Accessed November

    12, 2025

    ___. 2025. “Index.” https://rsf.org/en/index. Accessed

    September 11, 2025

    Rivera, Mauricio. 2017. “Authoritarian Institutions and State Repression: The Divergent Effects 

    of Legislatures and Opposition Parties on Personal Integrity Rights.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, no. 10: 2183–2207.

    Ryan, Patricia Peghini. 1972. “The Arab Socialist Union of Egypt.” PhD diss., West Virginia 

    University.

    Salehyan, Idean, Cullen S. Hendrix, Jesse Hamner, Christina Case, Christopher Linebarger, 

    Emily Stull, and Jennifer Williams. “Social Conflict in Africa: A New Database.” International Interactions 38, no. 4 (2018): 503–511.1

    Salem, Ahmed. “Gaza Jihadists Undermine Egypt-Hamas Cooperation.” Atlantic
    Council. Last modified September 22, 2017. Accessed November 26, 2025.
    https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/gaza-jihadists-undermine-egypt-hamas-cooperation/
            

    Sinai. Schanzer, Jonathan. “Gamal Mubarak: Successor Story in Egypt?” The Washington Institute for 

    Near East Policy, October 17, 2002. Accessed September 14, 2024. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/gamal-mubarak-successor-story-egypt.

    Schewe, Eric. “Why Did Ousted Egyptian President Morsi Lose Power?” JSTOR Daily, June 27, 2019. Accessed September 18, 2024. https://daily.jstor.org/why-did-ousted-egyptian-president-morsi-lose-power/.

    Scowcroft, Brent. Memorandum to Gerald Ford, memorandum, “104. Memorandum from the President’s Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs (Scowcroft) to President Ford,” October 11, 1974. Accessed October 27, 2025.

    https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v26/d104.

    Shahin, Ahmed Fahmy. “The Quest for Legitimacy: The Egyptian State From Nasser to Sisi.” 

    PhD diss., University of St. Andrews, 2017..

    Shehata, Dina. “The Fall of the Pharaoh: How Hosni Mubarak’s Reign Came to an End.”

    Foreign Affairs 90, no. 3 (2011): 26–28, 29–32.

    —-. “Sixty Years of Egyptian Politics: What Has Changed?” The Cairo Review of Global 

    Affairs, Spring 2018.

    Sika, Nadine. 2018 . “Repression, Cooptation, and Movement Fragmentation in 

    Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from the Youth Movement in Egypt.” Political Studies, Vol. 67, Issue 3, 676-692.

    Springborg, Robert. “Abdel Fattah el-Sisi: The One and Only Egyptian Dictator.” In Dictators 

    and Autocrats: Securing Power Across Global Politics, edited by Klaus Larres, 282–299. London: Routledge, 2021.

    Svolik, Milan W. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule, 56-67. New York: Cambridge University 

    Press, 2012.

    Tarek, Sherif. “Runoffs Between Brotherhood’s Morsi and Mubarak Regime’s Shafiq Have

    Egypt in a Bind.” Ahramonline, 2012. Accessed September 17, 2024. https://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/36/122/42896/Presidential-elections-/Presidential-elections-news/MursiShafiq-presidential-showdown-puts-Egypt-revol.aspx.

    Tonsy, Sara. “The Egyptian Army in the Political and Economic Fields Since 2013: A 

    Neo-Military Society.” Confluences Méditerranée, no. 122 (2022/3): 129–142.

    ‘Turning Point’: What Happened during Egypt’s Rabaa Massacre 10 Years Ago?” Al
               Jazeera. Last modified August 14, 2023. Accessed October 27, 2025.
               https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/14/
              turning-point-what-happened-during-egypts-rabaa-massacre-10-years-ago.

    Ullah, Kafayat, and Jahanzeb Khan. “Gamal Abdul Nasser: The Protagonist of Arab 

    Nationalism.” Middle East Review 2 (2020): 159–178.

    Wedeman, Ben. “Demonstrators in Egypt Rail against Brutality, Man’s Death.” CNN, June 25,

    2010. The Wayback Machine. Accessed October 15, 2025. https://web.archive.org/web/20110201014256/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-06-25/world/egypt.police.beating_1_brutality-mohamed-elbaradei-egyptian?_s=PM%3AWORLD.

    Westad, Odd Arne. “The Revolutionaries: Anticolonial Politics and Transformations.” In The

    Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the

                Making of Our Times. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

    Williamson, Scott. “Comparing Election Monitoring Statements from Egypt.”

              Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Last modified May 29, 2014.

              Accessed October 27, 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2014/05/comparing-  

              election-monitoring-statements-from-egypt?lang=en.

    Yefet, Bosmat, and Limor Lavie. “Legitimation in Post- Revolutionary Egypt: Al- Sisi and the 

    Renewal of Authoritarianism.” Digest of Middle East Studies (April 10, 2021).

    Endnotes


    [1] Steven A. Cook, “Egypt Goes From Bad to Worse: Under President Sisi, the Nation Longs

    for the Good Old Days of Mubarak,” Council on Foreign Relations. April 3, 2017, accessed November 19, 2022. https://www.cfr.org/blog/egypt-goes-bad-worse-under-president-sisi-nation-longs-good-old-days-mubarak; Ibid, “Sisi Isn’t Mubarak. He’s Much Worse,” Foreign Policy, December 19, 2018, accessed November 18, 2022.

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/19/sisi-isnt-mubarak-hes-much-worse; Zena Al-Tahhan, “‘Egyptian Society Being Crushed’ Five Years After Military Coup,” Al Jazeera, July 2, 2018, accessed November 1, 2022. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2018/7/2/egyptian-society-being-crushed-five-years-after-military-coup; Amy Hawthorne & Andrew Miller, “Worse Than Mubarak,” Foreign Policy, February

    27, 2019, accessed November 18, 2022. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/02/27/worse-than-mubarak/.              

    [2] This indicator was chosen because the CSF are traditionally the primary means of crushing street dissent in Egypt since the time of Gamal Abdel Nasser, which I elaborate more on in the Hypotheses section

    [3] Karl Marx, “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte”. in The Marx-Engels

    Reader, ed. Robert C. Tucker (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, [1851] 1978), 444-445.

    [4] Bruce Bueno de Mesquita & Alastair Smith, The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad

    Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics (New York. PublicAffairs, 2011), 17; Ibid, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow, The Logic of Political Survival (Cambridge. MIT Press, 2003).

    [5] Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, “Statement by President Abdel Fattah El Sisi at Ceremony Marking

    His Inauguration,” Speech, Cairo, June 8, 2014; Bosmat Yefet and Limor Lavie, “Legitimation in Post- Revolutionary Egypt: Al- Sisi and the Renewal of Authoritarianism.” Digest of Middle East Studies 30 (2021): 176, https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12244

    [6] Monen Said Aly, “The Paradox of the Egyptian Revolution,” Middle East Brief, September 2011, 3, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.academia.edu/41758249/The_Paradox_of_the_Egyptian_Revolution .

    [7] Maged Mandour & Hossam el-Hamalawy, “Understanding Sisi’s Grip on Power” Rosa

    Luxemburg Stiftung, June 18, 2024, accessed September 10, 2024. https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/52220/understanding-sisis-grip-on-power; Sara Tonsy, “The Egyptian Army in the Political and Economic Fields Since 2013: A Neo-Military Society,” Confluences Méditerranée 122 (2022-2023): 129-130.

    [8] Timothy Frye. Weak Strongman: The Limits of Power in Putin’s Russia (Princeton, Princeton UP, 2021), 38-39.

    [9] Robert Springborg, “Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, The One and Only Egyptian Dictator,” in Dictators and Autocrats: Securing Power Across Global Politics, ed. Klaus Llarres, (London: Routledge 2021), 286.

    [10] Joshua A. Svolik, The Politics of Authoritarian Rule (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 56-67.

    [11] “‘Turning Point’: What Happened during Egypt’s Rabaa Massacre 10 Years Ago?,” Al Jazeera, last modified August 14, 2023, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/14/turning-point-what-happened-during-egypts-rabaa-massacre-10-years-ago.

    [12] Frye “Weak Strongman,” 118.

    [13] Mauricio Rivera, “Authoritarian Institutions and State Repression: The Divergent Effects of Legislatures and Opposition Parties on Personal Integrity Rights,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, no. 10 (2017): 2185.

    [14] Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince, trans. Tim Parks (New York: Penguin Random House, 2009), 64.

    [15] Ahmed Fahmy Shahin, “The Quest for Legitimacy: The Egyptian State From Nasser to

    Sisi” (PhD diss. University of St. Andrews, 2017), 33-34. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/15580

    [16] Kafayat Ullah and Jahanzeb Khan, “Gamal Abdul Nasser: The Protagonist of Arab Nationalism,” Middle East Review 2 (2020): 165.; Nayra Mahmoud Hassan, “Leader’s Political Ideology and Decision- Making Process: Nasser as Case Study,” Future Journal of Social Science 2, no. 2 (2023); Faris M. Almutairi, “Nationalist Revolution and its Influence on Political and Social Democracies: Educational and Agricultural Systems under Nasser, 1952-1970,” Annals of the Faculty of Arts 52 (2023): 335, https://doi.org/10.21608/aafu.2024.354999.

    [17] Patricia Peghini Ryan, “The Arab Socialist Union of Egypt” (PhD diss., West Virginia University, 1972). https://www.proquest.com/docview/302593067

    [18] “Nasser’s ‘Measured Democracy’,” New York Times, March 23,1964. https://www.nytimes.com/1964/03/23/archives/nassers-measured-democracy.html

    [19] Odd Arne Westad, “The Revolutionaries: Anticolonial Politics and Transformations”, in The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times (Cambridge UP, 2005), 67.

    [20] Byroade to State Department, telegram, [1955], Office of the Historian, United States Department of State. https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780312286835/page/272/mode/2up?q=272.

    [21] Said K. Aburish, Nasser: The Last Arab (New York: St. Martin’s Press/Thomas Dunne Books, 2004), 272.

    [22] Dina Shehata, “Sixty Years of Egyptian Politics: What Has Changed?” The Cairo Review of Global Affairs, Spring 2018, https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/sixty-years-of-egyptian-politics-what-has-changed/;Shahin, “The Quest for Legitimacy” 35.

    [23]Marina Ottaway, “Abdicating Responsibility: Political Parties in Egypt,” Wilson Center, May 25, 2021, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/abdicating-responsibility-political-parties-egypt.; Egypt Law No. 40/1977

    [24] Jason Brownlee, “Peace Before Freedom: Diplomacy and Repression in Sadat’s Egypt,” Political Science Quarterly 126, no. 4 (2011–2012), https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2011.tb00715.x; Ahmed S. Hashin, “The Egyptian Military Part One: From the Ottomans Through Sadat,” Middle East Policy 18, no. 3 (2011): 68, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2011.00498.x

    [25] Shehata, “Sixty Years.”

    [26] Ali E. Hillal Dessouki, “Shifting Tides: Egypt’s Unexpected Path after the 1973 War,” The Cairo Review of Global Affairs, American University in Cairo, Fall 2023. https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/shifting-tides-egypts-unexpected-path-after-the-1973-war/.

    [27] Dessouki, “Shifting Tides,” The Cairo Review of Global Affairs

    [28] Brent Scowcroft to Gerald Ford, memorandum, “104. Memorandum from the President’s Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs (Scowcroft) to President Ford,” October 11, 1974, accessed October 27, 2025. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v26/d104; “The Camp David Accords: The Framework for Peace in the Middle East,” opened for signature September 17, 1978.

    [29] Hicham Bou Nassif, “Wedded to Mubarak: The Second Careers and Financial Rewards of Egypt’s Military Elite, 1981-2011,” Middle East Journal 67, no. 4 (2013): 509.

    [30] Fauzi M. Najjar, “Mubarak’s Constitutional Reforms,” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 38, no. 1 (2011): 12, https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.20559000. ; Human Rights Watch, Monopolizing Power: Egypt’s Political Parties Law (New York: Human Rights Watch, January 2007). https://www.hrw.org/report/2007/01/04/monopolizing-power/egypts-political-parties-law; Egypt Law No. 177/2005; Hamdy A. Hassan, “Civil Society in Egypt Under the Mubarak Regime,” Afro Asian

    Journal of Social Sciences. Vol 2. No. 2.2. Quarter II (2011): 11-13.

    [31] Dina Shehata, “The Fall of the Pharaoh: How Hosni Mubarak’s Reign Came to an End.”

    Foreign Affairs 90, No. 3 (2011), 26-32; Limor Lavie, “From Pharaoh to Hero: Contested Constructions of Mubarak’s Image In Egyptian Post-Uprising Collective Memory,” British Journal for Middle Eastern Studies (2024): 1-12.; “Egypt’s Last Pharaoh? The Rise and Fall of Hosni Mubarak,” TIME, February 12, 2011, accessed October 15, 2025. https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2045328_2045338_2048689,00.html.

    [32] Associated Press, “Mubarak Casts Shadow over U.S. Policy,” Politico, last modified August 20, 2013, accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/egypt-hosni-mubarak-095701;  

    [33] William Lafi Youmans, “An Unwilling Client: How Hosni Mubarak’s Egypt Defied the Bush Administration’s ‘Freedom Agenda,’” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29, no. 4 (2015): 1213-1215, accessed October 27, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1018137; Marcus Baram, “How The Mubarak Family Made Its Billions” HuffPost. May 25, 2011, accessed September 13, 2024. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-the-mubarak-family-made-its-billions_n_821757; Jonathan Schanzer, “Gamal Mubarak: Successor Story in Egypt?” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Oct. 17, 2002, accessed September 14, 2024. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/gamal-mubarak-successor-story-egypt; Jason Brownlee, “The Heir Apparency of Gamal Mubarak,” The Arab Studies Journal 15-16, No. 2/1 (2007-2008): 36.

    [34] Hannah Elsisi El-Chazli and Neil Ketchley. In discussion with David Siddartha Patel. Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, January 28, 2021.Transcript; Angela Joya, “The Egyptian Revolution: Crisis of Neoliberalism and the Potential for Democratic Politics,” Review of African Political Economy 38, No. 129 (2011): 368-369, 10.1080/03056244.2011.602544; Nathan, J Brown, “Egypt’s Judges in a Revolutionary Age” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, February 22, 2012, accessed September 13, 2024. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2012/02/egypts-judges-in-a-revolutionary-age?lang=en; Al Jazeera Staff, “What Happened During Egypt’s January 25 Revolution?” Al Jazeera. Jan.

    25, 2023, accessed September 18, 2024. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/1/25/what-happened-during-egypts-january-25-revolution.

    [35] Ben Wedeman, “Demonstrators in Egypt Rail against Brutality, Man’s Death,” CNN, June 25, 2010, The Wayback Machine, accessed October 15, 2025. https://web.archive.org/web/20110201014256/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-06-25/world/egypt.police.beating_1_brutality-mohamed-elbaradei-egyptian?_.

    [36] Rasha Abdulla, et. al, “Facebook Polls as Proto-Democratic Instruments in the Egyptian Revolution: The ‘We Are All Khaled Said’ Facebook page” Global Media and Communication. 14, Issue 1 (2018), 141-142, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766518760085; Killian Clarke and Korhan Kochak, “Launching Revolution: Social Media and the Egyptian Uprising’s First Movers” British Journal of Political Science 50, Issue 3 (2018), 1025-1026, 10.1017/S0007123418000194.

    [37] David D. Kirkpatrick. “Egyptian Is Counting On Worries of Elites,” The New York Times, May 27, 2012, accessed September 17, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/28/world/middleeast/ahmed-shafik-counting-on-egyptian-elites-fears.html; Sherif Tarek, “Runoffs Between Brotherhood’s Morsi and Mubarak Regime’s Shafiq Have Egypt in a Bind,” Ahram Online, June 19, 2012, accessed September 17, 2024. https://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/36/122/42896/Presidential-elections-/Presidential-elections-news/MursiShafiq-presidential-showdown-puts-Egypt-revol.asp.

    [38] “Celebration in Egypt as Morsi Declared Winner,” Al Jazeera, June 24, 2012, accessed September 20, 2024. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2012/6/24/celebration-in-egypt-as-morsi-declared-winner.

    [39] Zachary Laub, “Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood,” Council on Foreign Relations, last modified August 15, 2019, accessed November 9, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/egypts-muslim-brotherhood#chapter-title-0-1; Nadim Mirshak, “The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt: A Gramscian Re-examination,” Current Sociology 71, no. 3 (2021): 491, accessed November 9, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211039273.

    [40] Eric Schewe, “Why Did Ousted Egyptian President Morsi Lose Power?” JSTOR Daily,

    June 27, 2019, accessed September 18, 2024. https://daily.jstor.org/why-did-ousted-egyptian-president-morsi-lose-power/.

    [41] David D. Kirkpatrick and Mayy El Sheikh, “Citing Deadlock, Egypt’s Leader Seizes New Power and Plans Mubarak Retrial” The New York Times. Nov. 22, 2012, accessed September 17, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/23/world/middleeast/egypts-president-morsi-gives-himself-new-powers.html; Eric Schewe, “Why Did Ousted Egyptian President Morsi Lose Power?” JSTOR Daily,

    June 27, 2019, accessed September 18, 2024. https://daily.jstor.org/why-did-ousted-egyptian-president-morsi-lose-power/.

    [42] Schewe, “Why Did Ousted,” JSTOR Daily.

    [43] David D. Kirkpatrick and Steven Erlanger, “Egypt’s New Leader Spells Out Terms for U.S.-Arab Ties,” The New York Times, last modified September 23, 2012, accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/23/world/middleeast/egyptian-leader-mohamed-morsi-spells-out-terms-for-us-arab-ties.

    [44] Al-Tahhan, “‘Egyptian Society,” Al Jazeera.

    [45] Springborg, “Abdel Fattah,” 286; Patrick Kingsley, “Egypt’s Sisi Sworn in as President,” The Guardian, June 8, 2014, accessed September 11, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/08/egypt-sisi-sworn-in-president.

    [46] Scott Williamson, “Comparing Election Monitoring Statements from Egypt,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, last modified May 29, 2014, accessed October 27, 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2014/05/comparing-election-monitoring-statements-from-egypt?lang=en.

    [47]  Michael Crowley, “‘We Caved’ What Happened When Barack Obama’s Idealistic Rhetoric Collided with the Cold Realities of War and Dictatorship in the Middle East and Beyond.,” Politico Magazine, January 2016,accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/we-caved-obama-foreign-policy-legacy-213495/; Sahar Aziz, “U.S. Foreign Aid and Morsi’s Ouster,” Middle East Institute, last modified July 31, 2013, accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.mei.edu/publications/us-foreign-aid-and-morsis-ouster#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20government%20announced,in%20support%20of%20democracy%20abroad; United States Department of State, “U.S. Foreign Assistance by Country: Egypt,” ForeignAssistance.gov, last modified September 29, 2025, accessed October 27, 2025, https://foreignassistance.gov/cd/egypt/.

    [48] Patrick Wintour, “‘I Am the Only One That Matters’: Trump Deals Praise and Insults at Gaza Summit,” The Guardian, last modified October 14, 2025, accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/14/donald-trump-gaza-summit-praise-insults-world-leaders; Nancy A. Youssef et al., “Trump, Awaiting Egyptian Counterpart at Summit, Called Out for ‘My Favorite Dictator,’” Wall Street Journal, last modified September 13, 2019, accessed October 27, 2025. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-awaiting-egyptian-counterpart-at-summit-called-out-for-my-favorite-dictator-11568403645.

    [49] Stewart Patrick et al., “BRICS Expansion and the Future of World Order: Perspectives from Member States, Partners, and Aspirants,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, last modified March 31, 2025, accessed November 12, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/03/brics-expansion-and-the-future-of-world-order-perspectives-from-member-states-partners-and-aspirants?lang=en#egypt.;

    [50] People’s Daily Press, “Chinese Firm Finalizes Deal for Building Huge Business District in Egypt’s New Capital,” People’s Daily, last modified October 12, 2017, accessed November 11, 2025, http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/1012/c90000-9278780.html; Jevans Nyabiage, “China at the Centre of Egypt’s New Capital Which Will House 6 Million People,” South China Morning Post, Alibaba Group, last modified June 9, 2025, accessed November 11, 2025, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3313333/china-centre-egypts-new-capital-which-will-house-6-million-people; Egypt Today Staff. “Egypt’s New Administrative Capital Rebranded as ‘NewCapital’ in Official Correspondence.” Egypt Today. United Media Services. Last modified November 8, 2025. Accessed November 10, 2025.https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/143350/
         Egypt%E2%80%99s-New-Administrative-Capital-rebranded-as-%E2%80%98New-Capital%E2%8
         0%99-in-official.

    [51] Karen DeYoung, “Russia Urged Egypt to Send Rockets, in Sign of Its Need for Munitions,” ed. Cate Brown, The Washington Post, last modified April 17, 2023, accessed November 11, 2025, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/17/russia-ukraine-egypt-weapons-leaked-documents/.

    [52] Al Jazeera Staff, “US, Qatar and Egypt Say Mediators Will Work to Finalise Gaza Ceasefire Deal,” Al Jazeera, last modified August 16, 2024, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/16/us-qatar-and-egypt-say-mediators-will-work-to-finalise-gaza-ceasefire-deal; AFP, “Gaza Mediators ‘Working Very Hard’ to Revive Truce Plan: Egypt,” Arab News, Saudi Research & Publishing Company, last modified August 12, 2025, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.arabnews.com/node/2611614/middle-east; Angie Omar, “Egypt’s Dilemma: Navigating the Israel-Hamas Conflict,” Voice of America, last modified October 20, 2023, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.voaafrica.com/a/egypt-s-dilemma-navigating-the-israel-hamas-conflict/7320053.html.

    [53] Ahmed Aboudouh, “Egypt Now Sees Israel as an Imminent Threat,” Chatham House, last modified September 17, 2025, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/09/egypt-now-sees-israel-imminent-threat#:~:text=A%20warning%20wrapped%20in%20angst,from%20Sinai%20and%20invite%20retaliation.

    [54] “Egypt’s Gaza Dilemmas,” International Crisis Group, last modified May 16, 2024, accessed November 11, 2025, https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/egypt-israelpalestine/b91-egypts-gaza-dilemmas.

    [55] Ahmed Salem, “Gaza Jihadists Undermine Egypt-Hamas Cooperation,” Atlantic Council, last modified September 22, 2017, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/gaza-jihadists-undermine-egypt-hamas-cooperation/#:~:text=Over%20the%20past%20few%20years,ISIS%20youth%20emigrated%20to%20Sinai; “Egypt’s Gaza,” International Crisis Group.

    [56] Mohamed Nabil El-Bendary, “Egypt’s Delicate Balance: Maintaining US Support While Confronting Gaza Challenges,” Stimson Center, last modified April 18, 2025, accessed November 11, 2025, https://www.stimson.org/2025/egypts-delicate-balance-maintaining-us-support-while-confronting-gaza-challenges/; Extraordinary Arab Summit (Palestine Summit), “Cairo Statement Issued by the Extraordinary Arab Summit (Palestine Summit),” news release, March 5, 2025, accessed November 11, 2025, https://www.presidency.eg/en/قسم-الأخبار/أخبار-رئاسية/news532025/.

    [57] Hossam El-Hamalawy, “In Egypt, Mubarak’s Repression Machine Is Still Alive and Well”

    The Guardian. May 16, 2012, accessed November 9, 2022. .https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/16/egypt-mubaraks-repression-machine-alive-well

    [58]Janet B. Johnson et. al., Political Science Research Methods. (Thousand Oaks, CA. CQ Press, 2016, 391).

    [59] Alexandra Kuimova, “Understanding Egyptian Military Expenditure” SIPRI. October 2020, accessed October 7, 2022. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2020/sipri-background-papers/understanding-egyptian-military-expenditure

    [60] Freedom House, “Media Freedom” 2022, accessed December 2, 2022. https://freedomhouse.org/issues/media-freedom

    [61] Reporters Without Borders determines these rankings via a questionnaire sent to their in-country partner organizations asking recipients to score their country on 43 different indicators such as imprisonment of journalists, length of imprisonment, degree of self-censorship, etc. These numbers are then synthesized into a “Global Score” that determines a country’s ranking vis-a vis other countries and their categorization into the above categories. The exact formula used by Reporters Without Borders varies from year to year, which is a weakness of the source. I choose to use it regardless because despite the exact math changing, the questionnaire continues to ask roughly the same questions, and the overall ranking of states in the Index does not appear to be significantly impacted by the change in calculations. EX: North Korea is consistently ranked “Very Serious” year after year.

    [62] “حصر قتلى عهد السيسي/عدلي منصور تفصيلياً (مُحَدَّث) حتي 31 يناير 2014” [Inventory of the dead in the era

    of Sisi/Adly Mansour (Updated) Until January 31, 2014] Wiki Thawra, 2014. https://wikithawra.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/sisicasualities/;               

    “حصر قتلي الـ 18 يوم الأولي من الثورة تفصيليا” [“Listing the Deaths of the First 18 Days of the

    Revolution in Detail”].Wiki Thawra, October 23, 2013. https://wikithawra.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/25jan18dayscasualities/; “(حصر قتلى عهد محمد مرسي تفصيلياً (محدث” [Listing the Dead of the Era of Mohammed Morsi in Detail (Updated)], Wiki Thawra, last modified June 2013.

    [63] James Pitts, “Justice or Just Us: Media Portrayals and the Context of Police Violence” (guest lecture, California State University, Fresno, 2022).

    [64] Idean Salehyan et. al., “Social Conflict in Africa: A New Database.”

    International Interactions, Vol. 38, No. 4 (2018), 503-511.

    [65] ACLED, “Data Export Tool” 2022, accessed November 25, 2022. https://acleddata.com/data-export-tool/.

    [66] Reporters Without Borders. “Index,” https://rsf.org/en/country/egypt. 2025, accessed September 11, 2025

    [67]  Ian Black, “Egyptian Editors Jailed for Defaming Mubarak,” The Guardian, last modified September 14, 2007, accessed November 12, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/sep/14/pressandpublishing.egypt#:~:text=Gasser%20Abdel%2DRazek%2C%20of%20Human,website%2C%20to%20ponder%20the%20question; “Press Freedom Recommendations for President Mubarak’s Fifth Term,” Reporters Without Borders, last modified September 9, 2005, accessed November 12, 2025, https://rsf.org/en/press-freedom-recommendations-president-mubaraks-fifth-term#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThis%20is%20why%20the%20press,%2C%E2%80%9D%20Reporters%20Without%20Borders%20concluded; Reporters Without Borders, “Egypt,” last modified 2025, accessed November 12, 2025, https://rsf.org/en/country/egypt.

    [68] Ben Gilbert, “Egypt’s Journalists Struggle under Mubarak-era Laws,” NBC News, last modified December 9, 2012, accessed November 12, 2025, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/egypts-journalists-struggle-under-mubarak-era-laws-flna1c7510084.

    [69] “حصر قتلى,” [Sisi/Adly,] Wiki Thawra; “ حصر قتلى,” [Morsi] Wiki Thawra; “حصر قتلي,” [First 18 Days,] Wiki Thawra.

    [70] Nadine Sika, “Repression, Cooptation, and Movement Fragmentation in

    Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from the Youth Movement in Egypt.” Political Studies, Vol. 67, Issue 3 (2018), 676-692.; “All According to Plan: The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protestors in Egypt” 2014. Human Rights Watch. August 12, 2014, accessed November 23, 2022.

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/08/12/all-according-plan/raba-massacre-and-mass-killings-protesters-egypt .

    [71] Sika, “Repression, Cooptation,” 684

    [72] Sika, “Repression, Cooptation”,685; Cook “Sisi Isn’t Mubarak.”

    [73] Khalil Al-Anani, “Rethinking The Repression-Dissent Nexus: Assessing Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood’s Response to Repression Since the Coup of 2013” Democratization  26, No. 8 (2019), 1329-1341.

    [74] Gary King et. al., Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994, 208-230).

    [75] Sika, “Repression, Cooptation”,685

    [76] Giovanni Capoccia & R. Daniel Kelemen, “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism,” World Politics 59, No. 3 (April 2007), 341-369

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR/S

    Caleb Helsel

    Caleb Helsel is a first year Masters student studying Global Governance, Politics, and Security, originally from Fresno, California. His research focuses on authoritarianism, regime transitions, and political legitimacy.

  • Unveiling the Green Facade: Ongoing Colonial Exploitation in Guatemala’s Mineral Extraction Industry

    By Amanda Clark

    Green Industry Crane (Image Source: Unsplash; https://tinyurl.com/wvn7t76s)


    Guatemala has a long history of violent intervention by other nations for transnational capital accumulation, be it through Spanish colonization or CIA-backed coups. Today, this trend of violence continues in the name of the energy transition. Though Guatemala is not a large international player in the transition mineral field, the nation is ranked 6th in the world for human rights abuses at transition mineral mines.[i] Since 2012, there have been at least 38 incidents of human rights abuse in Guatemala by companies mining for so-called “green transition minerals” like nickel zinc and silver, including the recent murder of Indigenous human rights and environmental defender Noé Gómez Barrera.[ii] Of these incidents, five include murders, while many more involve beatings, violence, sexual abuse, intimidation and threats, arbitrary detention, displacement, contamination of air and water, and violation of free, prior, and informed consent.[iii]

    In this paper, I argue that the ongoing violence surrounding Guatemala’s transition mineral sector is not an isolated issue, but rather a continuation of a long history of foreign intervention in the service of building transnational profit, now rebranded under the guise of the green energy transition. I use the theoretical frameworks proposed by green colonialism and decolonial theory to explore this idea, asserting that patterns emerge in Guatemala’s long history of Spanish (cacao/indigo) colonialism, (U.S.) banana colonialism, and (Swiss & Canadian) “green” transition mineral colonialism. While coloniality has taken on more “palatable” forms to the public in the Global North through rationalizing extraction as necessary for the green energy transition, the methods of dispossession and capital accumulation repeat the processes of historical colonial extraction. In their struggle against multinational companies, then, the land and human rights defenders who put their lives at risk to advocate for their communities present decolonial solutions to the triple planetary crisis (the converging threats of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution).

    I will begin the paper with an introduction to the problem of “green colonialism” and mineral extraction, followed by an analysis of historical and present-day causes. I will then turn to green colonialism and decolonial theory to further analyze the problem and potential solutions. Afterward, I will discuss advocacy efforts by land defenders, using the case study of Xinka land defenders’ fight against the Escobal silver mine. Through this paper, I will display the paths towards decolonial green futures demonstrated by territorial defense movements.

    Background

    Transition minerals (also called “critical minerals” or “green minerals”) are integral parts of green energy technologies. Manganese, lithium, nickel, cobalt, and graphite are required for the batteries that store energy when the sun is not shining or the wind is not blowing. Rare earth elements are crucial parts of the permanent magnets that keep wind turbines and EV motors running.[iv] Silver is a critical conductive agent in photovoltaic cells and EV batteries.[v] All these new and emerging technologies require more minerals than their fossil fuel-based counterparts. For example, electric cars require about six times the mineral inputs of conventional cars, while onshore wind plants need around nine times more mineral inputs than gas-fired power plants.[vi] Amid the global rush to decarbonize, demand for these transition minerals grows. The International Energy Agency projects that demand for transition minerals will increase fourfold by 2040 in order to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement, or sixfold to hit net zero globally by 2050.[vii]

    While the global climate movement has begun to focus on “climate justice” by acknowledging the disparate impacts of climate change on marginalized communities or entire countries in the Global South, I argue that insufficient attention is paid to the risks of injustice caused by the extraction of transition minerals. The mining sector as a whole is no stranger to human rights abuses, including land disputes, environmental health impacts, and the maltreatment of workers. [viii] Unfortunately, evidence from global oversight and advocacy groups points to the transition mineral industry following similar trends. A new report released by the Business and Human Rights Resource Center (BHRRC) claims that public support for a cleaner and more equitable future “is currently being squandered by companies due to an approach which entrenches inequality and abuse.”[ix] Furthermore, an estimated 54% of energy transition minerals are located on or near Indigenous lands.[x] Indigenous communities have historically been subject to gross human rights abuses and violent attacks in the name of both the mining and fossil fuel industries.[xi] Their proximity to the majority of the world’s mineral reserves is thus a cause for immense concern about future rights violations.

    Scholars and journalists alike link the extraction of nickel, silver, and zinc to forced displacement, sexual violence, kidnappings, and even murder in Guatemala.[xii] The most recently reported human rights abuse involving the transition mineral sector is the murder of Indigenous defender Noé Gómez Barrera in 2023. Barrera led numerous peaceful demonstrations against Alternativa de Energía Renovable (Renewable Energy Alternative) and the Escobal mine, which belongs to the Canadian multinational company Pan American Silver.[xiii]

    This tragedy is one of many human rights abuses committed by transition mineral corporations that have taken place in Guatemala. Each of the reported abuses are perpetuated by corporations headquartered in either Switzerland or Canada. These companies include the aforementioned Pan American Silver, as well as Tahoe Resources (now owned by Pan American Silver), Solaway Group, and Hudbay Minerals.[xiv] The involvement of transnational corporations underscores a broader historical dynamic: coloniality has often been advanced through corporate interests operating internationally, embedding exploitation within global economic structures. This is not unique to the green transition, but rather a repeating phenomenon studied by decolonial theorists across time. This phenomenon has now evolved into what scholars have called “green colonialism.”[xv]

    Mining in Guatemala is not a new phenomenon brought about by the green transition; rather, it is a long-term project intensified by the increasing transition mineral rush and its accompanying green-washing rhetoric. As explained by journalist Sandra Cuffe:

     “The history of mining in Guatemala over the past sixty years is one of violence, corruption, and impunity. It is a history of transnational mining companies doing whatever they need in order to advance their interests, working with every government administration along the way, whether with genocidal military rulers or with administrations so corrupt that most top officials are now sitting in prison cells.”[xvi]

    For decades, mining corporations have aided the creation of pro-mining laws and the granting of land licenses, indicating that government structures are designed to serve the interests of transnational profit-building.[xvii] This pattern reflects a deeper legacy of historical colonial regimes, in which political and legal systems were deliberately shaped to enable the extraction of wealth by foreign powers at the expense of local communities.

    Continuities of Colonialism in Guatemala

    Guatemala’s relationship to foreign powers and resource extraction spans 500 years. Spanish colonialism was built on violent conquest and land theft. In 1524, Spanish forces led by Pedro de Alvaro began a violent conquest of Mayan lands in present-day Guatemala.[xviii] Despite fierce resistance from the Indigenous communities, colonial forces prevailed in their efforts, eventually forcing communities into servitude on vast plantations.[xix] The spread of disease squashed further resistance, and “various (colonial) practices … irrevocably altered the ecological and psychological harmony of the Amerindian world.”[xx] Thus, the combination of direct violence, exploitative economic models, disease, and environmental destruction combined to create optimal conditions for colonial extraction and control.

    Extraction of primary commodities, principally agricultural commodities like cacao and indigo, was the cornerstone of the Spanish colonial economy in Guatemala. These commodities, produced by the labor of enslaved Indigenous and African people, were transported to colonial Spain and from there elsewhere in Europe. As the fiscal hub for indigo trade, the Kingdom of Guatemala became the administrative center for the Spanish empire in Central America. Indigo quickly became a lucrative cash crop for the Spanish colonial economy, fueling the growth of a powerful elite that persists even in present-day Guatemala.[xxi]

    These landed elite continued to hold power after independence in 1821. Military regimes upheld the feudal economic model of the colonial era as a series of military dictators aligned with the economic elite.[xxii] Processes of continued oppression and domination, enacted through both violent repression and legal mechanisms, had the cumulative effect of concentrating land in the hands of a few at the expense of the great majority.[xxiii]

    In the 18th century, Guatemala became a “banana republic,” a term used to describe nations where powerful foreign (often fruit) corporations exploit a country’s resources and political instability for profit. [xxiv] These corporations essentially replace traditional colonial powers, reproducing colonial patterns in what scholars have termed “neocolonialism.”[xxv] In the case of Guatemala, bananas replaced indigo, while the United Fruit Company replaced colonial Spain. The United Fruit Company, headquartered in the United States, was the largest landholder in Guatemala, owning about 550,000 acres of land.[xxvi] Through a subsidiary company, United Fruit owned and controlled much of the country’s most important infrastructure, including railways, hospitals, ports, and telegraph lines.[xxvii]

    Echoing the model of Spanish colonialism, United Fruit’s operations in Central America were characterized by direct violence, exploitative economic models, and environmental destruction, which together facilitated extraction and control. The company often relied on authoritarian governments to suppress worker unrest and maintain control over labor and resources. Their operations were (and still are today) characterized by deforestation, soil degradation, and pollution.[xxviii] These patterns are characteristic of neocolonialism, a central element of which is “the economic and political control of a state from the outside, despite formal sovereignty.”[xxix] I argue that United Fruit’s incursions formed the second wave of colonialism in Guatemala, “banana colonialism,” a pattern that is echoed worldwide by today’s “green” transition mineral corporations.

    In 1952, President Jacobo Árbenz’s Agrarian Reform Law aimed to expropriate large uncultivated plots to redistribute to the country’s landless population.[xxx] However, this effort was short-lived. The reforms conflicted with the interests of the United Fruit Company, which used its connections in the U.S. government to push for U.S. intervention. On the advice of Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and CIA Director Allen Dulles – two former partners of the United Fruit Company’s law firm – President Eisenhower authorized the CIA to organize Operation Success.[xxxi] In 1954, a U.S.-backed coup ousted Árbenz, replacing him with a right-wing military government that reversed land reforms.[xxxii]

    In 1960, disgruntled with the continued oppression and inequality perpetuated by the U.S.-supported military government, left-wing guerrilla groups began battling government military forces. [xxxiii] For the next 36 years, Guatemala would be plunged into political violence.[xxxiv] The Guatemalan Civil War was marked by violent attacks by the Guatemalan military against Indigenous communities under the guise of combating leftist guerrillas, instigating what has been described by many as another genocide against the country’s Indigenous peoples.[xxxv] Throughout this period, an estimated 200,000 people were killed or disappeared, while 1.5 million more were displaced by the violence.[xxxvi]

    The U.S.-backed coup and eventual civil war in Guatemala did not just act as protectorates of U.S. banana interests, but also set the stage for transnational mining in the country. The U.S. coup put Lieutenant Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas in power in 1954. One year later, he issued Decree 272, which encouraged investment in Guatemala’s mining sector. In 1960, a year after the official start of the civil war, EXMIBAL (a mining company majority- owned by Canadian nickel corporation INCO) was formed and exploration work began.[xxxvii] EXMIBAL opened the country’s first large metal mine in an area known to be a center of guerrilla resistance.[xxxviii] These mining activities fueled a crackdown on resistance in the area that cost an estimated 3,000 to 6,000 lives.[xxxix]

    Another military coup put Colonel Enrique Peralta Azuria into power in 1963. Azuria’s government enacted a new mining code, reportedly written by an INCO engineer. The government then issued EXMIBAL a forty-year, 385-kilometer land concession. The rest of the war was marked by political repression of INCO’s opponents, human rights abuse against locals, and the murder of numerous lawyers & academics investigating the abuses.[xl]

    The 1996 Peace Accords brokered peace for the nation, but rather than slowing violent extractive projects, the accords signaled that Guatemala was open for business. Just months after the accords were signed, the government enacted a new mining law allowing foreign companies to wholly own mining enterprises operating in Guatemala. These companies were also made exempt from various taxes, and government royalties on mined minerals were reduced. As a result, “Guatemala became one of the cheapest places in the world to mine.”[xli] Thus, the trends of government corruption, human rights abuse, and the suppression of opposition continue to echo from the post-war peace period to today.[xlii]

    While the green transition certainly was not at the heart of Guatemala’s early mining operations, it has provided new language for mining companies in the country to justify the expansion of their operations. One key example is the Escobal silver mine in southeastern Guatemala, operated by Minera San Rafael. This company was originally a subsidiary of Canadian company Tahoe Resources and is now owned by Pan American Silver.

    The exploration license for the Escobal silver mine was granted to Minera San Rafael / Tahoe Resources in 2010 in the territory of the Indigenous Xinka people without their consent.[xliii] Since the project’s inception in 2010, Indigenous Xinka and campesino (peasant farmer) communities have organized peaceful protests, referenda, and legal challenges. They seek to defend their land, environment, and right to free, prior, and informed consent.[xliv] The company and state have responded with militarization, criminalization of activists, and violence. They hired groups like International Security and Defense Management (a private security firm run by a U.S. Special Forces veteran) and Golan Group (founded by former Israeli special forces officers). Numerous attacks against defenders have since taken place in the name of “protect(ing) the investments,” in the words of Guatemalan President Óscar Berger.[xlv] Such violence includes the criminalization of the mine’s opponents, assassinations of several community leaders, kidnappings, and a notorious 2013 attack in which mine security opened fire on peaceful demonstrators.[xlvi]

    The Escobal mine is an explicitly colonial project. In 2012, Tahoe claimed that “although Indigenous people may have inhabited the site at one time, there are no Indigenous populations currently living in the immediate area of the Escobal Project site.”[xlvii] They then bought radio ads claiming that “the Xinka people do not exist.”[xlviii] This is a clear case of a multinational corporation explicitly erasing Indigenous people to cut costs and reduce its responsibility to consult local Indigenous communities. The corporation calls Indigenous locals “Latinos,” land defenders “terrorists,” and mineral mining “critical to the transition to a low-carbon economy,” shifting the narrative to convince international stockholders and local stakeholders that their operations are ethical and crucial to long-term green development.[xlix]

    The mine was suspended in 2017 following a ruling by Guatemala’s Constitutional Court that upheld the Xinka people’s right to consultation. [l] However, when Pan American Silver assumed control of the project in 2019 through their acquisition of Tahoe Resources, the corporation reinvigorated the push toward full mining operations at the site by hosting haphazard community consultations.[li] The process has been marred by exclusion and discrimination, leading the Xinka Parliament, the elected representative body of the Xinka people, to demand a full restart in accordance with international standards.[lii] Yet, on their website, Pan American Silver claims that they “respect… Indigenous Peoples’ right to consultation” and that they are “participating in good faith and in full respect to the terms of the Constitutional Court ruling, the ILO 169 consultation process and our Global Human Rights Policy.” They go on to make claims about their “low” environmental impact, arguing that “both the mine and process were designed to minimize water consumption, waste generation, and environmental disturbance through a state-of-the-art paste backfill, filtered tailings, and a dry stack tailings facility.”[liii]

    Given the company’s history of erasing Indigenous peoples, their complicity in the murder of defenders, and their track record of environmental damage, these claims are questionable.[liv] Experts have raised significant concerns about the environmental impacts of the mines, including impact on water access, water pollution, and toxic waste. For example, an analysis of the site raised concern about the serious risk of a collapse of the mine’s tailings dam, which would release a massive flow of mining waste into the surrounding environment. Of the 22.6 million tons of material projected to be extracted from the Escobal mine, only a small percentage is commercially viable. The rest of the extracted material – over 96% of the remaining toxic waste – would remain forever on Xinka territory, deposited on the tailings stack and filled into the mine tunnel.[lv]

    Theorizing the Green Transition: Green Colonial & Decolonial Theories

    These troubling patterns of extraction, abuse, and corruption are not just taking place in Guatemala. Throughout Latin America, the rush towards a green energy transition has been marred by human rights abuses. Between 2010 and 2020, the BHRRC recorded 501 cases of abuse linked to transition mineral extraction, green technology development, and clean energy installation across Mexico, Central, and South America.[lvi] In Latin America, the burden of abuse falls predominantly on Mexico and Central America, which represent 68% of cases recorded in the Latin American region.[lvii] As BHRRC reports:

    “Renewable energy development is too often replicating the social and environmental

    violence that has characterized the fossil fuel sector. Latin America bears a

    disproportionate share of that burden: with 61% of global abuse reports, it is the region

    with the highest number of abuses in renewable energy development, and the number is

    increasing.”[lviii]

             Scholars have recently proposed “green colonialism” as a theoretical framework to understand the complexities and power dynamics driving human rights abuses in the green energy space. As political ecologist Felix Dorn argues, “the global energy transition continues to be based on the geographic externalization of labor, natural resources, and sinks. The energy transition thus increases the pressure on natural resources in Latin America and reproduces the continent’s position as the world’s raw material supplier.”[lix] This theoretical framework puts the instance of human rights abuse in the broader picture of geopolitical histories of abuse and extraction for power and profit.[lx] Human rights abuse is not the unfortunate, one-off casualty of insufficient corporate oversight, but rather a symptom of a corrupt geopolitical system in which colonizing nations and their multinational corporations both past and present exploit extractive frontiers.

    Green colonialism as a theoretical framework further reveals that the so-called green energy transition is not merely a technological or environmental shift, but a political and economic project that maintains the extractive hierarchies of the colonial era. Under the banner of sustainability, Latin American territories are once again cast as resource frontiers or sacrifice zones whose communities, ecosystems, and sovereignties are made expendable for the benefit of a global decarbonization agenda led by the Global North. The term green colonialism foregrounds how new forms of dispossession are justified by climate goals, enabling greenwashing to obscure the violent realities of land grabbing, toxic pollution, and social displacement that often accompany mining for lithium, nickel, and other transition minerals.[lxi]

             Importantly, green colonialism allows us to trace a throughline from Spanish colonialism to banana colonialism to today’s corporate-led race for clean energy resources, or green colonialism. The colonial logic persists: extract wealth, export harm, and erase resistance.

    Rather than promoting true transformation then, the green transition remains “embedded in the hegemonic Euro-North American-centered modernity,” advancing tecno-optimist solutions and reproducing extractivist patterns of thought, knowledge, and action.[lxii] Instead of reducing extractivism, the green energy transition expands extractive activities, reproducing historical patterns in the name of “green growth.”[lxiii] By relying on the philosophy of “green growth,” the green energy transformation, as a stand-alone solution to climate change, entrenches rather than subverts the colonial, extractivist modes of being that caused the triple planetary crisis in the first place.

    While green colonialism draws attention to the material and geopolitical continuities of extraction under the guise of climate action, decolonial theory offers a broader analytical lens. It interrogates how these patterns are rooted in deeper structures of Western dominance that shape not just local and global economies, but also political authority and systems of knowledge.[lxiv] In this way, decolonial theory complements and extends the critique of green colonialism, revealing how the green transition reproduces not only extractive geographies but also colonial power relations and ways of knowing and being.

    Decolonial theorists argue that Western civilization “consolidates its power and dominance through economic, political, and epistemological means.”[lxv] This is an important lens through which to read the Western focus on fighting climate change through a green-growth-focused energy transition. Through this lens, we can read the imperative to transition to “green energy” while maintaining growth — without paying reparations, investing in “loss and damage,” redistributing land, or reorganizing exploitative economic models — as further consolidating Western dominance.

    Economically, the green transition keeps formerly colonized nations locked into roles of extracting primary commodities, while powerful nations profit by owning mining corporations and selling green technologies built from those resources. Politically, decision-making power remains concentrated in the Global North, where institutions and governments craft climate agendas that exclude the voices and priorities of frontline communities, often replicating colonial power dynamics.[lxvi] Epistemologically, the green-growth narrative upholds Western ideas of development through market-based solutions, while dismissing Indigenous knowledges, alternative cosmologies, and non-capitalist forms of relating to land and climate. This narrative reinforces the myth that formerly colonized nations can rise to greater levels of political and economic influence through integration into the same global economy that has long exploited them.

    In tandem, the theoretical frameworks of green colonialism and decolonial theory offer a powerful critique of the green energy transition as a continuation of colonial systems of domination. Green colonialism exposes the material and geopolitical continuities of extraction and dispossession under a “green” banner, while decolonial theory helps us understand how these dynamics are upheld through economic dependence, political marginalization, and epistemic erasure. Together, they illuminate how the green transition, rather than dismantling the structures that created the climate crisis, risks deepening them. Unless the green transition is re-rooted in justice, reparations, and the centering of historically marginalized voices, it will remain a colonial project in a new form.

    Contesting green colonialism through land defense

    Like resistance to Spanish and banana colonialism, resistance to mineral mining in Guatemala has been met with violent crackdowns as corporate and government interests once again align against local demands for justice.[lxvii] Yet, this repression has not silenced opposition to extractive transition mineral projects. A powerful example is the Xinka people’s resistance to the Escobal mine, which underscores that the struggle against extraction is not merely legal or economic; it is deeply political and rooted in a broader decolonial movement.[lxviii]

    The Xinka people’s very understanding of land, space, and territory rejects the Western epistemology of land as commodity. In many Indigenous epistemologies, territory is “the social space in which cultural and personal identity is produced and recreated; where memory is maintained, where they can exercise their collective rights to the exercise of their individuality, to their own vision of the future, and to a life plan for good living.”[lxix] The Xinka people’s understanding of territory is organized across four axes: biophysical, material, epistemological, and symbolic. Given their understanding of territory as central to daily life and cultural continuity, the Xinka people’s movement in defense of land and territory does not just protect the geographic space and the resources within it, but also their way of seeing and being in the world.[lxx]

    Xinka philosophy reflects what decolonial scholars call a “relational mode of life,” in which land is not seen as a resource to exploit but as a living system of reciprocal relations and obligations.[lxxi] These movements not only resist extractivism, but also defend a worldview based on interdependence and care.[lxxii] In this sense, resistance becomes a form of world-making, offering alternatives to capitalist and colonial models. As extractivism imposes death and displacement, these grassroots struggles propose life, autonomy, and self-organization while laying the groundwork for decolonial green futures.

    Xinka and other land defenders who defy continued exploitation of land and people in the name of a “green future” show that a relational way of life is key to decolonial green futures. From this perspective, it is not an energy transition that will reverse the damage caused to the climate but rather dramatic cultural shifts away from extractivism and toward reciprocal, place-based relationships with the ground beneath our feet and the global human and other-than-human community. Such shifts demand reimagining sustainability beyond technology and market solutions, instead centering Indigenous sovereignty, ecological stewardship, and collective care as the foundation for truly just futures.

    At the core of the transformation advanced by land defenders is not only a profound cultural shift, but also a restructuring of political systems to center local relationships and community autonomy. The Xinka Parliament represents this mode of community organizing in its resistance to the Escobal mine. As Luis Fernando Garcia Monroy, survivor of the 2013 attack against protestors by Escobal’s private security, explains: “Our ancestral practices are reflected in how we organize and share information among ourselves. We create a plan to ensure important information is shared directly with each member of the community.”[lxxiii] Genuine democratic engagement is fundamental to this form of organizing.

    The Xinka Parliament forms the backbone of the movement’s organizing strategy. The Parliament includes delegates from 25 communities, elected every two years. These delegates participate in regular public assemblies, where they address local issues and ensure communities remain “informed and organized in the fight to reclaim and exercise their rights as Indigenous people.”[lxxiv] During the Covid-19 pandemic, this community-based organizing model also enabled rapid mobilization for the distribution of food, goods, and information to families facing severe hardships.[lxxv]

    This organizing model reflects what Arturo Escobar describes as land defense struggles’ efforts to “reorganize society on the basis of local and regional autonomy, characterized by social relations and forms of organizing which are neither capitalist nor liberal.”[lxxvi] This model is grounded in “self-organization focusing on the construction of non-state forms of power.”[lxxvii] The Xinka people’s movement exemplifies the urgent need for alternative political structures that are deeply rooted in place and community, rejecting dominant State-based systems that prioritize global capital and geopolitical influence. As Álvarex and Coolaset claim, “alternative political organization has the capacity to expose and modify the colonial rationale of the state,” thereby creating space for decolonial forms of relationality that center the lived experiences and priorities of the people.[lxxviii]

    Future Studies

    Significant gaps remain in academic research regarding what a truly decolonial green future might entail, a gap I have sought to address by highlighting the resistance of Xinka land defenders in Guatemala. However, the voices of these defenders continue to be sidelined in mainstream academic and media discourse, limiting the ability of this research to fully close this gap. Future research on transition minerals and green colonialism must prioritize and amplify the perspectives of frontline defenders by centering their voices, their epistemologies, and their modalities of organizing. Additionally, theoretical frameworks such as green sacrifice zones offer valuable lenses through which to analyze similar cases. Future studies could apply this framework to examine how mining corporations and transnational decision-makers render certain spaces and people disposable under the cover of a “green” future.

    Future studies should also analyze mainstream initiatives to address corporate social responsibilities, such as the Responsible Mining Initiative (RMI).[lxxix] While frameworks such as these that audit, assess, and mandate reporting of mining operations are an important step forward, their focus on “responsible” minerals often focuses narrowly on environmental and labor considerations, without considering the broader context of land tenure and Indigenous rights. RMI, for example, completely fails to mention Indigenous communities on their website.[lxxx] While it was not in the scope of this project, future research could assess how the norms and voluntary standards established by organizations such as RMI align or conflict with Indigenous rights and worldviews.

    Conclusion

    By analyzing the transition mineral rush in Guatemala, alongside the nation’s colonial history through the lenses of green colonial and decolonial theories, I have displayed that mineral extraction forms a third colonial wave in Guatemala. Precipitated by Spanish indigo/cacao colonizers and U.S. banana colonizers, the actions undertaken by Canadian and Swiss green colonial powers mirror historical patterns of extraction, exploitation, abuse, murder, and corruption in the name of building transnational capital and geopolitical power. Through language that paints mineral extraction as necessary for the global green transition, companies like PanAmerican Silver render their colonial models more palatable to the public in the Global North, thus subverting international concerns over human rights abuses. In contrast, land defenders’ struggles against multinational companies present decolonial solutions to the triple planetary crisis and ongoing human rights abuses. Indigenous communities’ ontologies, lifeways, and community organizing models present ways of responding to environmental and climate catastrophe that lie outside mainstream “green growth” models.

    The renewable energy transition is necessary—but it cannot come at the cost of human lives, Indigenous sovereignty, and environmental justice. Guatemala shows us how today’s “clean” technologies are built on centuries-old colonial structures. From forced labor under Spain, to banana monocultures under United Fruit, to today’s deadly mining operations, there is a clear throughline. To achieve a climate-just future that prioritizes all human life over profit, we must not only look forward but also look back. A truly just transition requires interrogating the historical foundations of ecological harm and recognizing the knowledge systems, worldviews, and lived practices of those who have resisted colonialism for centuries. What they teach is that the transition must not only be technological, but also cultural, political, and decolonial.

    Endnotes


    [i] Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. 2024 Transition Minerals Tracker. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2024. https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/2024_Transition_Minerals_Tracker_EN.pdf; Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. Transition Minerals Tracker. Accessed April 15, 2025. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/transition-minerals-tracker/.

    [ii] Ibid; Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. “Noé Gómez Barrera – Parliament of the Xinka Peoples.” Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2023. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/no%C3%A9-g%C3%B3mez-barrera-parliament-of-the-xinka-peoples/?utm_source=mosaic&utm_medium=api.

    [iii] ibid.; Kassam, Ashifa. “Guatemalan Women Take on Canada’s Mining Giants Over ‘Horrific HumanRights Abuses’.” The Guardian. (2017). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/13/guatemala-canada-indigenous-right-caadian-mining-company.

    [iv] International Energy Agency. 2021. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. Paris: IEA, 2021.https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions.

    [v] Smirnova, Maria. 2024. “Silver’s Critical Role in the Clean Energy Transition.” Sprott.

    [vi] International Energy Agency. ”The Role of Critical Minerals.”

    [vii] Ibid.

    [viii] Baskaran, Gracelin. 2023. “Why Responsible Mining Is a Human Rights Imperative.” CSIS. https://www.csis.org/analysis/why-responsible-mining-human-rights-imperative.

    [ix] Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. 2024. “Transition Minerals Tracker: 2024 Analysis.” Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/transition-minerals-tracker/.

    [x] IRENA. n.d. “Geopolitics of the Energy Transition: Critical Materials.” IRENA. Accessed May 1, 2025. https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transition-Critical-Materials.

    [xi]

    Scheidel, Arnim, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Anju Helen Bara, Daniela Del Bene, Dominique M. David-Chavez, Eleonora Fanari, Ibrahim Garba et al. “Global impacts of extractive and industrial development projects on Indigenous Peoples’ lifeways, lands, and rights.” Science Advances 9, no. 23 (2023): eade9557.; Anaya, S. James. “Report of the special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples on extractive industries and indigenous peoples.” Ariz. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 32 (2015): 109.

    [xii] Kassam, Ashifa. “Guatemalan Women Take on Canada’s Mining”; Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. ”2024 Analysis.”; Brown, Alleen, and Martyna Starosta. 2019. “She Defended Her Land against a Mine in Guatemala. Then She Fled in Fear for Her Life.” The Intercept. June 23, 2019. https://theintercept.com/2019/06/23/guatemala-land-defender-san-rafael-mine/.; Church, Clare, and Alec Crawford. “Minerals and the metals for the energy transition: Exploring the conflict implications for mineral-rich, fragile states.” In The geopolitics of the global energy transition, pp. 279-304. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.

    [xiii] Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. “Noé Gómez Barrera”

    [xiv] Business & Human Rights Resource Center, “Transition Minerals Tracker.”

    [xv] Dorn, Felix Malte. 2022. “Green Colonialism in Latin America? Towards a New Research Agenda for the Global Energy Transition.” Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Del Caribe [European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies] 0 (114): 137. https://doi.org/10.32992/erlacs.10939.

    [xvi] Cuffe, Sandra. “Mining in the Guatemalan Mafia State.” Testimonio: Canadian Mining in the Aftermath of Genocides in Guatemala, edited by Catherine Nolin and Grahame Russell. Between the Lines, 2021. 1985

    [xvii] ibid.

    [xviii] Lovell, W. George. 1988. “Surviving Conquest: The Maya of Guatemala in Historical Perspective.” Latin American Research Review 23 (2): 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100022202.

    [xix] Webre, Steven. 2019. “Guatemala (Colonial Period).” Oxford Bibliographies, Accessed March 2025. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199766581/obo-978199766581-0209.xml.; The Center for Justice and Accountability. 2009. “Guatemala.” Cja.org. Accessed October 24, 2025. https://cja.org/where-we-work/guatemala/.

    [xx] Lovell, W. George. “Surviving Conquest.” 29.

    [xxi] Reiche, Olga. 2016. “Indigo in Guatemala.” ReVista. 2016. https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/indigo-in-guatemala/.

    [xxii] The Center for Justice and Accountability. “Guatemala.”

    [xxiii] U.S. Agency for International Development. 2005. “Guatemala Conflict Vulnerability Assessment: Final Report,”  Accessed December 2024.

    [xxiv] Costello, Patrick. 1997. “Historical background: Accord Guatemala.” Accord, no. 2.

    https://www.c-r.org/accord/guatemala/historical-background-accord-guatemala.; Gillick, Steven Scott. Life and labor in a banana enclave: Bananeros, the united fruit company, and the limits of trade unionism in Guatemala, 1906 to 1931. Tulane University, 1994.

    [xxv] Han, Danielle. 2023. “Fruit Geopeelitics: America’s Banana Republics.” JSTOR Daily. 2023. https://daily.jstor.org/fruit-geopeelitics-americas-banana-republics/.

    [xxvi] Costello. “Historical background: Accord Guatemala.”

    [xxvii] Táíwò, Olúfémi O. 2021. “When the United Fruit Company Tried to Buy Guatemala.” The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/united-fruit-guatemala/.

    [xxviii]Baloga, Caroline. n.d. “United Fruit Company’s Struggles With Sustainability : How Could United Fruit Company Have Sustainably Managed the Agro-Ecosystems of Banana

    Plantations While Meeting the Demands of a Growing Mass Market?” Gala. Accessed

    October 1, 2024.

    [xxix] Dorn,. “Green Colonialism in Latin America?”

    [xxx] Zinn Education Project. n.d. “June 27, 1954: Elected Guatemalan Leader Overthrown in CIA-Backed Coup.” Zinnedproject.org. Accessed September 24, 2024. https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/jacobo-arbenz-guzman-deposed/.; Solman, Paul. 2011. “Timeline: Guatemala’s Brutal Civil War.” PBS News. March 7, 2011. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/latin_america-jan-june11-timeline_03-07.

    [xxxi] ibid.

    [xxxii] ibid.

    [xxxiii] PBS. “Timeline: Guatemala’s Brutal Civil War.”; Nieves Zúñiga, “Guatemala – Context and Land Governance,” Land Portal, November 29, 2023, https://landportal.org/book/narratives/2023/guatemala.

    [xxxiv] Ibid.

    [xxxv] Ibid.

    [xxxvi] Zúñiga, Nieves. 2023. “Guatemala – Context and Land Governance.” Land Portal. Accessed September 8, 2024.

    https://landportal.org/book/narratives/2023/guatemala.; The Center for Justice and Accountability. “Guatemala.”

    [xxxvii] Cuffe, Sandra. 2021. ”Mining in the Guatemalan Mafia State.” Testimonio: Canadian Mining in the Aftermath of Genocides in Guatemala. Edited by Catherine Nolin and Grahame Russell.

    [xxxviii] Brown, Alleen, and Martyna Starosta. “She Defended Her Land.”

    [xxxix] Fox, Samantha. 2015. “History, Violence, and the Emergence of Guatemala’s Mining Sector.” Environmental Sociology 1 (3): 152–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1046204.

    [xl] Cuffe, Sandra. “Mining in the Guatemalan Mafia State.”

    [xli] Brown, Alleen, and Martyna Starosta. “She Defended Her Land”

    [xlii] Cuffe, Sandra. “Mining in the Guatemalan Mafia State.”

    [xliii] Moore, Ellen. 2025. “Xinka Parliament Calls Out Pan American Silver Obstruction of Escobal Mine Consultation.” Culturalsurvival.org. 2025. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/xinka-parliament-calls-out-pan-american-silver-obstruction-escobal-mine-consultation.; Croft, Valerie. 2020. “Indigenous Peoples Are Using Ancestral Organizing Practices to Fight Mining Corporations and Covid-19.” Inequality.org. August 3, 2020. https://inequality.org/article/indigenous-peoples-mining-pandemic/.

    [xliv] EJ Atlas. N.d. “Proyecto Minero El Escobal, Guatemala.” EJ Atlas. Accessed April 1, 2025.  https://ejatlas.org/conflict/el-escobal

    [xlv] Solano, Luis. 2015. “Cómo se Constituyó un Proyecto Cuasi Militar en el Proyecto Minero Escobal.” http://www.albedrio.org/htm/documentos/Solano-SanRafaelLasFlores.pdf.

    [xlvi] ibid.; Brown, Alleen, and Martyna Starosta. “She Defended Her Land”

    [xlvii] Tahoe Resources Inc. 2012. “ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM For the year ended December 31, 2011.” Sec.gov. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1510400/000106299312001538/exhibit99-1.htm

    [xlviii] Copeland, Nicholas. 2019. “Talking Like a Mining Company: The Escobal Mine in Guatemala.” NACLA. 2019. https://nacla.org/news/2019/10/10/guatemala-mining-indigenous.

    [xlix] Tahoe Resources Inc. “ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM”; Brown, Alleen, and Martyna Starosta. “She Defended Her Land”; PanAmerican Silver. n.d. “Escobal.” Pan American Silver. Accessed May 1, 2025. https://panamericansilver.com/operations/silver-segment/escobal/ 

    [l] EJ Atlas.“Proyecto Minero El Escobal.”

    [li] Ibid.

    [lii] Ibid.

    [liii] PanAmerican Silver. “Escobal.”

    [liv] “Conflict and Harm at Pan American Silver.” 2020. The Ecologist. March 4, 2020. https://theecologist.org/2020/mar/04/conflict-and-harm-pan-american-silver.

    [lv] Earthworks & Institute for Policy Studies. 2025. “Impacts of the Escobal Silver Mine on the Xinka Indigenous People and Guatemala’s Obligation to Respect their  Self-Determination.”

    [lvi] Business and Human Rights Resource Center. 2021. “Renewable energy (in)justice in Latin

    America.” Business and Human Rights Resource Center.

    [lvii] ibid.

    [lviii] ibid. pg 4.

    [lix] Dorn, Felix Malte. 2022. “Green Colonialism in Latin America?” pg 137.

    [lx] Dorn, Felix Malte. 2022. “Green Colonialism in Latin America?”

    [lxi] ibid.; Álvarez, Lina, and Brendan Coolsaet. “Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies: A Latin American Perspective.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 31, no. 2 (2020): 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272.; Blaser, Mario. 2013. “Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe: Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology.” Current Anthropology 54 (5): 547–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270.; Escobar, Arturo. 2016. “Sentipensar Con La Tierra: Las Luchas Territoriales y La Dimensión Ontológica de Las Epistemologías Del Sur.” AIBR Revista de Antropologia Iberoamericana 11 (1): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.v11i1.68045.; Reinhardt, Akim. 2016. “Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition.” Contemporary Political Theory 15 (1): e52–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2015.20.

    [lxii] ibid. 137.

    [lxiii] Dorn, Felix Malte. 2022. “Green Colonialism in Latin America?”

    [lxiv] Ibid.;

    [lxv] Álvarez, Lina, and Brendan Coolsaet. 2020. “Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies: A

    Latin American Perspective.” Pg 2 (my emphasis added).

    [lxvi] Sultana, Farhana. 2022. “The Unbearable Heaviness of Climate Coloniality.” Political Geography 99 (102638): 102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638.

    [lxvii] Cuffe, Sandra. “Mining in the Guatemalan Mafia State.”

    [lxviii] Fuentes, Claudia Dary, and Licda Guadalupe A. García. 2022. El Pueblo Xinka y Sus Percepciones Sobre El Impacto Cultural y Espiritual Del Proyecto Minero Escobal.

    [lxix] Ibid. Pg 13, my translation.

    [lxx] Ibid.

    [lxxi] Álvarez & Brendan Coolsaet. “Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies.”; Mario. “Ontological Conflicts”; Escobar. Sentipensar Con La Tierra.” Reinhardt. “Red Skin, White Masks.”

    [lxxii] Álvarez & Brendan Coolsaet. “Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies.”

    [lxxiii] Croft, Valerie.“Indigenous Peoples Are Using Ancestral Organizing”

    [lxxiv] ibid.

    [lxxv] ibid.

    [lxxvi] Álvarez, Lina, and Brendan Coolsaet. “Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies.” 11.; Escobar, Arturo. “Sentipensar Con La Tierra.” Pg 53-54.

    [lxxvii] ibid.

    [lxxviii] Álvarez, Lina, and Brendan Coolsaet. “Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies.” Pg 11.

    [lxxix] RMI. n.d. Accessed October 10, 2025.

    https://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/minerals-due-diligence/risk-management/r

    sk-readiness-assessment-(rra)/ 

    [lxxx] ibid.

    Works Cited

    Álvarez, Lina, and Brendan Coolsaet. “Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies: A Latin American Perspective.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 31, no. 2 (2020): 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272.

    Anaya, S. James. “Report of the special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples on extractive industries and indigenous peoples.” Ariz. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 32 (2015): 109.

    Baloga, Caroline. “United Fruit Company’s Struggles With Sustainability — Gala.” Gala. Accessed April 10, 2025. https://www.learngala.com/cases/0288a456-cb0a-4c38-b31f-3f2a60348ebf/.

    Baskaran, Gracelin. “Why Responsible Mining Is a Human Rights Imperative.” CSIS, 2023. https://www.csis.org/analysis/why-responsible-mining-human-rights-imperative.

    Blaser, Mario. “Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe: Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology.” Current Anthropology 54, no. 5 (2013): 547–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270.

    Bucheli, Marcelo. “Multinational Corporations, Totalitarian Regimes and Economic Nationalism: United Fruit Company in Central America, 1899–1975.” Business History 50, no. 4 (2008): 433–54.

    Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. 2024 Transition Minerals Tracker. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2024. https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/2024_Transition_Minerals_Tracker_EN.pdf.

    Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. “Noé Gómez Barrera – Parliament of the Xinka Peoples.” Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2023. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/no%C3%A9-g%C3%B3mez-barrera-parliament-of-the-xinka-peoples/?utm_source=mosaic&utm_medium=api.

    Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. Transition Minerals Tracker. Accessed April 15, 2025. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/transition-minerals-tracker/.

    Brown, Alleen. “She Defended Her Land Against a Mine in Guatemala. Then She Fled in Fear for Her Life.” N.p.: The Intercept, 2019. https://theintercept.com/2019/06/23/guatemala-land-defender-san-rafael-mine/.

    Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. Renewable Energy (In)Justice in Latin America. 2021. https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/RE_LATAM_final_English.pdf.

    Copeland, Nicholas. “Talking Like a Mining Company: The Escobal Mine in Guatemala.” NACLA, 2019. https://nacla.org/news/2019/10/10/guatemala-mining-indigenous.

    Costello, Patrick. “Historical Background: Accord Guatemala.” Accord, no. 2 (1997). https://www.c-r.org/accord/guatemala/historical-background-accord-guatemala.

    Coulthard, Glen Sean. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.

    Croft, Valerie. “Indigenous Peoples Are Using Ancestral Organizing Practices to Fight Mining Corporations and Covid-19.” Inequality.org, 2020. https://inequality.org/article/indigenous-peoples-mining-pandemic/.

    Damonte, G. “¿Qué es el territorio?” Audio recording, Aula Abierta, Pontifica Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP), 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NexhmBmZmc8&t=499s.

    Dorn, Felix Malte. “Green Colonialism in Latin America? Towards a New Research Agenda for the Global Energy Transition.” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 114 (2022): 137–46.

    Environmental Justice Atlas, Mining Watch Canada, Earthworks, Institute for Policy Studies Global Economy Program, Red Mexicana de Afectadas y Afectados por la Minería, and Observatorio de Conflictos Mineros en Zacatecas. “Conflict and Harm at Pan American Silver.” The Ecologist, 2020. https://theecologist.org/2020/mar/04/conflict-and-harm-pan-american-silver.

    Escobar, Arturo. Sentipensar con la Tierra. Vol. 1. Medellín: Ediciones Unaula, 2014.

    “Executive Summary – The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions – Analysis.” IEA, 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions/executive-summary.

    Fuentes, Claudia Dary, and Licda Guadalupe A. García. “El Pueblo Xinka y sus Percepciones Sobre el Impacto Cultural y Espiritual del Proyecto Minero Escobal.” 2022.

    Fox, Samantha. “History, Violence, and the Emergence of Guatemala’s Mining Sector.” Environmental Sociology 1, no. 3 (2015): 152–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1046204.

    Han, Danielle. “Fruit Geopeelitics: America’s Banana Republics.” JSTOR Daily, 2023. https://daily.jstor.org/fruit-geopeelitics-americas-banana-republics/.

    International Energy Agency. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. Paris: IEA, 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions.

    IRENA. “Geopolitics of the Energy Transition: Critical Materials.” Accessed May 1, 2025. https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transition-Critical-Materials.

    Kassam, Ashifa. “Guatemalan Women Take on Canada’s Mining Giants Over ‘Horrific Human Rights Abuses’.” The Guardian, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/13/guatemala-canada-indigenous-right-caadian-mining-company.

    Lovell, W. George. “Surviving Conquest: The Maya of Guatemala in Historical Perspective.” Latin American Research Review 23, no. 2 (1988): 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100022202.

    Moore, Ellen. “Xinka Parliament Calls Out Pan American Silver Obstruction of Escobal Mine Consultation.” Cultural Survival, 2025. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/xinka-parliament-calls-out-pan-american-silver-obstruction-escobal-mine-consultation.

    Nieves Zúñiga. “Guatemala – Context and Land Governance.” Land Portal, November 29, 2023. https://landportal.org/book/narratives/2023/guatemala.

    Cuffe, Sandra. “Mining in the Guatemalan Mafia State.” In Testimonio: Canadian Mining in the Aftermath of Genocides in Guatemala, edited by Catherine Nolin and Grahame Russell, 1985. Between the Lines, 2021.

    PBS. “Timeline: Guatemala’s Brutal Civil War.” PBS NewsHour, March 7, 2011. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/latin_america-jan-june11-timeline_03-07.

    “Proyecto Minero El Escobal, Guatemala.” EJ Atlas. Accessed April 1, 2025. https://ejatlas.org/conflict/el-escobal.

    Reiche, Olga. “Indigo in Guatemala Textile Dye and the Biology of Culture.” ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America, 2016. https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/indigo-in-guatemala/.

    Sanford, Victoria. “Violence and Genocide in Guatemala.” MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale. Accessed 2025. https://macmillan.yale.edu/gsp/violence-and-genocide-guatemala-0#:~:text=%28Responsibility%20for%20Acts%20of%20Violence,Union%29%20responsible%20for%20three%20percent.

    Scheidel, Arnim, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Anju Helen Bara, Daniela Del Bene, Dominique M. David-Chavez, Eleonora Fanari, Ibrahim Garba et al. “Global impacts of extractive and industrial development projects on Indigenous Peoples’ lifeways, lands, and rights.” Science Advances 9, no. 23 (2023): eade9557.

    Smirnova, Maria. “Silver’s Critical Role in the Clean Energy Transition.” Sprott, 2024. https://sprott.com/insights/silver-s-critical-role-in-the-clean-energy-transition/.

    Solano, Luis. “Cómo se Constituyó un Proyecto Cuasi Militar en el Proyecto Minero Escobal.” 2015. http://www.albedrio.org/htm/documentos/Solano-SanRafaelLasFlores.pdf.

    Sultana, Farhana. “The Unbearable Heaviness of Climate Coloniality.” Political Geography 99 (2022): 102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638.

    Tahoe Resources Inc. “Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2011.” 2012. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1510400/000106299312001538/exhibit99-1.htm.

    Táíwò, Olúfémi O. “When the United Fruit Company Tried to Buy Guatemala.” The Nation, 2021. https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/united-fruit-guatemala/.

    The Center for Justice & Accountability. “Guatemala – CJA.” 2009. https://cja.org/where-we-work/guatemala/.

    U.S. Agency for International Development. “Guatemala Conflict Vulnerability Assessment: Final Report.” 2005.

    Webre, Steven. “Guatemala (Colonial Period).” Oxford Bibliographies, 2019. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199766581/obo-9780199766581-0209.xml.

    Zinn Education Project. “June 27, 1954: Elected Guatemalan Leader Overthrown in CIA-Backed Coup.” Zinn Education Project, 2014. https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/jacobo-arbenz-guzman-deposed/.Zografos, Christos. “The Contradictions of Green New Deals: Green Sacrifice and Colonialism.” Soundings 80, no. 80 (2022): 37–50.


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR/S

    Amanda Clark

    Amanda Clark is the International Regional Organizer for the Americas at the Climate Reality Project and a current student in the Natural Resources and Sustainable Development / International Affairs dual-degree program. She specializes in the intersection of land governance, the protection of environmental defenders, and human rights, with a particular focus on Central America.